"We've been through this kind of lying before. RC apologists can't argue from Scripture, so they rewrite other people's comments and then discuss those fictitious rewrites."
I made that statement because Roman Catholic apologists had just rewritten my comment and responded to their own rewrite of my statement as if I had written it which is common practice among some RC apologists.
As I said, that is a pathetic way to argue.
As I pointed out earlier, from the viewpoint of a Jew there is no Scriptural support for Christianity.
Then good thing neither of us is a Jew.
As I said before, I am happy to have you not believe me.
I made that statement because Roman Catholic apologists had just rewritten my comment and responded to their own rewrite of my statement as if I had written it which is common practice among some RC apologists.
I didn't rewrite your comment at all, the ONLY change I made was to point out which portion was metmom's.
As I said, that is a pathetic way to argue.
Asking you a question about something you wrote is "pathetic"?
Did you think that by cobbling together a dubious explanation you got to repost an objectionable post that had been deleted?
I'm pretty sure the mod gets to have the last word no matter how much it kills you not to be able to.
I wonder if somebody "accidentally" pressed the Abuse key.