To: Natural Law; Dr. Eckleburg
The fact is that quantitatively more Protestants voted for obama than Catholics did. When you have an election in which zero Protestants vote Democrat then you can start boasting. Until then it is simply hubris. What an absolutely stupid reply. 10 on a scale of 0-10.
Now for another (deliberately) stupid remark:
Many more Catholics voted Communist in Italy than Protestants did.
(The fact that Catholics greatly outnumber Protestants is not trlevant.) "Quantitatively" is the only relevant factor.
9,569 posted on
10/08/2010 12:04:39 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
"What an absolutely stupid reply. 10 on a scale of 0-10" The fact remains that even if 100% of Catholics had voted for Obama he would have still required a significant percentage of Protestants to win. No single group has clean hands.
9,572 posted on
10/08/2010 12:07:09 PM PDT by
Natural Law
(A lie is a known untruth expressed as truth. A liar is the one who tells it.)
To: OLD REGGIE
lol. Any club in the bag will do when all you want to do is throw it. 8~)
9,573 posted on
10/08/2010 12:07:21 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: OLD REGGIE; Natural Law
Many more Catholics voted Communist in Italy than Protestants did. Italy is about 87% Catholic and 4% Protestant, more Catholics vote for EVERYONE in Italy than Protestants do.
9,581 posted on
10/08/2010 12:12:30 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson