Fourteen Easy Ways to Improve the Liturgy

ic ^ | August 18, 2009 | Arlene Oost-Zinner and Jeffrey Tucker

[NYer]

Boredom during the liturgy is something all Catholics have felt from time to time, and it's never justifiable. No matter how mundane the architecture, how dull the homily, or how bad the music, what's taking place on the altar is a miraculous sacrifice that gives us the grace for salvation. That reality should be enough to keep our attention.

 

And yet boredom is a reality that good liturgy can help fight. Many parishes try to do so by inventing every manner of new enticement: brighter and larger banners, forced attempts to create an upbeat environment of friendliness and community, big bowls of incense carried by special ministers, and Donahue-style homiletics.

 

The attempt to jazz up the liturgy usually takes the form of musical enhancements and nearly always means more instruments and rhythms drawn from popular music. The rationale isn't complicated. Liturgists are frustrated that people don't get as excited about religion as they do about the pop divas and music videos, and they conclude that they need ever more musical pyrotechnics to make the difference.

 

But these approaches often backfire since the argument for them is flawed at its root. Community feeling and fun are fine, but if the liturgy doesn't offer a setting conducive to prayer and the contemplation of eternal mysteries, it has failed its first aesthetic aim.

 

In any case, Catholics can't compete with the local evangelical community centers for inspiring a toe-tapping community feeling. A recent Gallup poll of Catholics shows that weekly Mass attendance (45 percent do so) continues to slip, and for the first time has slipped behind Protestant churches (48 percent). The defectors from the Roman rite include those who flee to indults and Eastern liturgies or just drop out.

 

There are many reasons for this (demographic, cultural, and theological) and liturgists don't deserve all the blame. Yet the decline in the desire to attend Mass coincides with the de-emphasis on solemnity and the advance of mundane art forms in liturgy -- the popularization of music being the most conspicuous shift. People may say they love to hold hands, dance, and tap their toes at Mass, but this wears thin over time and eventually undermines the rationale for steady devotion. In fact, a 1981-1989 Notre Dame Study of Catholic Parish Life concluded that unrelenting attempts to get people to sing -- especially attempts that employ guitars -- actually increase boredom.

 

There are, however, ways to break with routine and inspire steadfastness and personal attachment to the liturgy. What follows are 14 very simple steps for repairing the weaknesses that mar many U.S. Catholic liturgies. Professional liturgists resist them because of the prevailing bias against anything that smacks of a pre-Vatican II sensibility. Nonetheless, the following suggestions are born of experience and a conviction that the first aim of liturgy is to aid inner reflection.

 

The suggestions below are simple and costless. They need not be implemented all at once. Small changes week by week will make a huge difference over time.

 

 

1. Turn down the volume.

 

It's hard to imagine this today, but Christian liturgy thrived for 1,950 years without microphones, electronic keyboards, amplifiers, mixers, sound technicians, and surround-sound speakers. These days, conventional guidebooks on liturgy emphasize "proclaiming" and broadcasting one's voice. Cantors use microphones as if they're music-video performers.

 

Beyond just being heard, the goal of all these contraptions and behaviors is to make the liturgy ever louder. The results are more often than not earsplitting, creating a sort of stupor. People feel that they're being imposed upon. Most of this, of course, comes about in reaction against the traditional use of the sotto voce -- the under voice -- which has been derided by modern liturgists as silence or whispering so that the people couldn't hear what was going on. Ironically, experts in the advertising world have found that the low voice actually draws out the attention of the listener.

 

The virtue of silence has been rediscovered in recent years, with numerous statements by the late Pope John Paul II and Vatican officials praising its ability to convey meaning in a noisy world. The musical counterpart to silence is not in-your-face pop but distant sounds of contemplation. Turn down the mikes and sing as if the human voice alone is responsible for filling the space. This will diminish the electronic presence in the liturgy and increase the God-given one as a means through which we are worshiping Him.

 

 

2. Chant for a prelude.

 

If you've ever been to an evangelical service, you know that the ten minutes prior to the service are social time. For Catholics, on the other hand, it's a time for prayer and preparation. Keyboard music is common during this time, but imagine something different: simple Latin chant, sung calmly, without affectation, with silence between verses. The simple sounds inspire prayer. A common objection is that people can't understand the words. Yet this isn't the time for pedagogy. It is a time for reflection, to begin to hear the voice of angels who speak in an unfamiliar tongue. The meaning is conveyed in the line of notes. The holy sounds remind people entering the church that they're in a holy place.

 

 

3. Curb the announcements.

 

In an age when the secular world lays claim to most of our time, making a few announcements has become a pastoral necessity. Sunday Mass is often the only opportunity a pastor has to inform his flock concerning parish and community life. Few are lucky enough to have schedules that permit them to go to daily Mass, much less have their children attend Catholic schools, and gone are the days where the parish or church plays a central role in the life of the village.

 

That being the reality, it's wise to adhere closely to the General Instruction of the Roman Missal's directive, inserting announcements after the liturgy of the Eucharist and before the dismissal, where they have the least chance of interrupting the framework of prayer set up by the liturgy. Welcoming statements from cantors or others before the procession even begins have nothing to do with the rite itself and are most likely utterances contrived for the purpose of artificially engaging the attention of the congregation. Announcements should not be made before Mass begins, save concerning matters absolutely necessary to the people's understanding of that particular Mass itself or other issues prudentially suggested by the pastor.

 

Mass doesn't begin because a cantor gets up and proclaims when, where, and how it is to happen. Mass begins when the priest enters the church, with or without a cross bearer, book bearer, lector, or deacon.

 

 

4. Choose plain, traditional hymns for the processional.

 

The first Christian hymns were Psalms, the text of which was already 500 years old when first used, and the melodies handed down from Jewish and Greek traditions. The principle then is the same today: Hymns should bespeak the long tradition of the faith, whether in Latin or in English, in form or in style. Liturgical music that mimics the sound of secular music should be left outside the church.

 

Singable hymns with familiar meters and cadences will tie members of the congregation together in adoration and prayer and to the experience of the whole body of Christ, in all times and all places. Liturgical music exclusively tied to current times and styles cannot accomplish this. More importantly, the sights and sounds of the Mass, although communal in one sense, must ultimately point the individual conscience to the mystery unfolding on the altar.

 

Processional music can also employ the choir alone, a stately piece of polyphony that lets people put down their hymnbooks and watch as the celebrant and altar servers walk forward carrying the crucifix. People should not be so busy with their hands and eyes that they don't notice this beautiful sight. In any case, liturgists make a great mistake in believing that people come to Mass only because they want to sing or that active participation can only take one form.

 

 

5. Sing the Kyrie.

 

One of the earliest and most recognizable parts of the Mass is not in Latin but Greek: the Kyrie. It has long been a living symbol of the unity of Eastern and Western Christendom. And yet for all the bits of music in the Roman Rite, the "Lord, Have Mercy" is most often said, not sung, by the priest and answered by the people. This beautiful passage of the penitential rite begins and is over in less than a few seconds.

 

The Kyrie seems to have taken on a diminished role in the liturgy, but is it too much to ask that a bit more time be taken in this beautiful expression of penance? If active participation in singing is what we desire, the Kyrie can be easily sung by even the least-musical priest or cantor and answered by the faithful. It can be sung in the original Greek. Everyone knows the words. By introducing new music settings according to the liturgical season, variation can be brought to the Mass. It serves at the outset as a reminder of why we have gathered at Mass as a community.

 

 

6. Choose a plainer Gloria.

 

So many thousands of settings of the Gloria are available today that it's a wonder that most parishes use pop versions filled with frippery and faux exuberance. An about-face is in order toward the simpler settings that can be easily learned and sung by all. A simple, English version can tap into traditional, chant-like sensibilities and do much to restore dignity and beauty to this song of praise.

 

A timeless Latin Gloria remains unmatched for the purpose of praising God in the liturgy. If your parish is one where a Latin ordinary is feared, as is the case in many parishes across the country, there's still something that can be done. Attempting the Gloria in Latin can be part of your reformist plan, but it's best to start on a small scale. Congregations can be easily overwhelmed when faced with something the length of the Gloria. The Latin will come in time, should you choose to keep working toward it.

 

An English Gloria may well fit the needs of the congregation on most occasions. Not to be forgotten, however, is that the General Instruction does permit a Gloria sung by the choir alone. You might want to exercise this option and do a plain Latin Gloria on certain feast days only, or perhaps even pull out all of the stops and do a polyphonic version, if rehearsal time and resources permit.

 

 

7. Fix the Psalm.

 

St. John Chrysostom reports that the Christians sang the Psalms unceasingly, and it was the earliest part of Scripture translated into Latin. Their centrality in Christian worship cannot be overestimated. The development of the sung Psalter is central to the development of all Christian music and music itself. What has happened to the Psalms today? Many settings published today sound like miniature versions of jazz ballads, and they're preprinted in the missalettes, giving the impression that these are an ecclesiastical requirement (they're not).

 

The goal might be the restoration of the Latin Psalter (via the Graduale or the Simplex), but that simply isn't viable at most parishes today, nor is any English rendering of the elaborate Gregorian chant readily available. What is possible is that they be done in radically reduced melodic form, without strange intervals or leaps. A simple line consisting of just a few notes is a fitting transition to using psalm tones or something more elaborate. At first, it might seem intimidating, even downright frightening, to abandon the printed line of music. The method is to sense the need for solemnity, and let the ear guide you.

 

The Psalm should begin not with an instrument but a confident single voice. His or her line of notes should be simple enough to be repeated by the people. The verses themselves should not be sung by the entire choir (which makes them sound muddy) but, again, by a single voice, who should think of it as a sung text. That means the singer must enunciate clearly and modulate the voice in a way that uses the space well.

 

 

8. The Offertory should be a time of preparation.

 

During the offertory, the bread and wine are brought forward to prepare us for the Eucharistic Prayer and the Consecration. The music therefore should not overshadow what follows but rather point to the coming sacrifice and prepare us mentally and spiritually.

 

Something quiet and beautiful (again, employing the human voice) is the way. Have the congregation sing a simple hymn, beginning with accompaniment if necessary, allowing the final verse or two to be sung a capella. The keyboard might be of assistance in getting people to sing, but in the long run, the congregation will become more confident if allowed to experience the beauty and mystery of their own voices joining together in preparation for the feast.

 

The offertory is also a good time to familiarize people with the great Latin hymns of the faith. Over the course of a year, the goal can be to cover only a modest number: Ave Maria, Jesu Dulcis, Ave Maris Stella, Ubi Caritas, Attende Domine, Ave Verum, and seasonal chants like Veni Creator and Regina Caeli. With enough repetition, these can be learned by anyone. They really should become part of the life of faith again.

 

 

9. Reduce and simplify the 'Mystery of Faith' and the 'Great Amen.'

 

The settings of these used in parishes are most commonly those put out by the big publishing houses. They tend to have Broadway-type orchestration, to be overdrawn, and to appear suddenly and without warning. Jarring at best, their drama, distilled into five seconds, can compete with the mystery of the Consecration itself. Simple chants sung by the people in a manner that extends from silent prayer are more appropriate.

 

The "Mystery of Faith" was never separate from the Consecration in the "old" Mass, so there is no authentic precedent to light our way. What can be done, however, is to reduce the "Mystery of Faith" to a single, unrepeated line without accompaniment. For that matter, the Amen need not be "great" but rather just two notes.

 

 

10. Shorten the Sign of Peace.

 

Let's be frank: This part of the liturgy, once very formal and reserved to the deacons and subdeacons, can be disconcerting. The minutes after the consecration just seem like a bad time to be required to greet people with a friendly hello or a kiss. The choir can do something about this. Don't let the Sign of Peace go on and on. Just begin the "Lamb of God" right away. Most people will be grateful.

 

 

11. Begin the communion chant (a simple Latin hymn will do) after the priest receives.

 

What to do while waiting for Communion? In parishes, there is no choice: watch in silence as the celebrant gives Communion to the elite laypeople who have been selected as official "eucharistic ministers." That is just not a pleasant sight, so it's best to introduce some music as a way of diverting attention and turning toward inward prayer. The General Instruction recommends that the communion song begin when the priest receives. So it should. And by the choir alone.

 

 

12. Don't force people to sing during communion.

 

Various attempts have been made over the years to get people to sing while they're standing in line or receiving. But these have been a failure. It is a simple fact that people don't want to sing during communion. Here's the archetype when active participation means something other than singing a song. It means receiving the Body of Christ. This is the perfect time for the choir to develop a sense of singing in a sacred manner, quietly and beautifully. Again, chant and polyphony are best, but don't overlook the possibility of a quiet organ piece as well. It should be prayerful, not boisterous. Mostly, people will be glad just to be left alone.

 

 

13. Allow for silence after communion.

 

One of the remarkable aesthetic aspects of the Roman rite is how quickly and suddenly it ends. Only a few minutes pass between the reception of Communion and the time of departure. This is a wonderful time for silence: no music, announcements, children's blessings, or anything. Just prayer.

 

 

14. Don't attempt a rousing good-bye.

 

Mass ends with the words "The Mass is ended," so nothing that happens after that should upstage what came before. The recessional, which is not mandatory, can be exuberant, of course. But many parishes have the problem of a great deal of talking and saying hello taking place after Mass, and upbeat recessionals can only make the problem worse. If the goal is to send people out into the world with a sense of what just took place, a recessional that recalls the quiet power of the whole liturgy is best.

 

 

More Elaborate Suggestions

 

There are other methods for enhancing the sense of solemnity, which really means creating sights and sounds that remind people they're in church. The choir can be in an inauspicious place. Carpet can be pulled up to eliminate the deadness in a room that compels the use of microphones. Traditional polyphony is a great way to add texture to a liturgy dominated by chant. Starting a children's choir is an investment in the future generation of singers and can dispel the impression that Latin is anachronistic or unsingable. Tacky banners can be taken down and replaced with beautiful art and statues from Christian history.

 

All of these changes help a liturgy become rooted in the broad range of Christian experience through the ages and convey the sense that the individual is part of something far larger than one parish or one age.

 

Catholic liturgy, by its nature and structure, cannot provide an imitation form of popular entertainment any more than the rock concert can suitably provide a good medium to encourage a sense of penance and the presence of the sacred. The unrelenting attempt to try and try again can have the unintended effect of causing people to feel manipulated. What's more, the clamor for ever more innovative liturgical enticements is wholly unnecessary.

 

The General Instruction is a worthy guide for achieving solemnity at Mass, and 2,000 years of tradition provide experience enough to prove it. Further proof comes when the liturgy again begins to spark the spiritual imagination and reminds us why we're there.

 

 

---

 

Musical Reminders from the General Instruction Purpose

 

The Christian faithful who gather together as one to await the Lord's coming are instructed by the Apostle Paul to sing together Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs (cf. Col 3:16). Singing is the sign of the heart's joy (cf. Acts 2:46). Thus Saint Augustine says rightly, "Singing is for one who loves." There is also the ancient proverb: "One who sings well prays twice."

 

 

Goal

 

[All elements of the Mass] should form a complete and organic unity, clearly expressive of the unity of the entire holy people. The character and beauty of the place and all its appointments should foster devotion and show the holiness of the mysteries celebrated there.

 

 

Style

 

All other things being equal, Gregorian chant holds pride of place because it is proper to the Roman liturgy. Other types of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded, provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation of all the faithful.

 

 

Assembly

 

Since the faithful from different countries come together ever more frequently, it is fitting that they know how to sing together at least some parts of the Ordinary of the Mass in Latin…

 

 

Choir/Cantor

 

Among the faithful, the schola cantorum or choir exercises its own liturgical function, ensuring that the parts proper to it, in keeping with the different types of chants, are properly carried out and fostering the active participation of the faithful through the singing. It is fitting that there be a cantor or a choir director to lead and sustain the people's singing. When in fact there is no choir, it is up to the cantor to lead the different chants, with the people taking part.

 

 

Mass Parts

 

The singing at the entrance is done either alternately by the choir and the people or in a similar way by the cantor and the people, or entirely by the people, or by the choir alone. Since the Kyrie is a chant by which the faithful acclaim the Lord and implore his mercy, it is ordinarily done by all, that is, by the people and with the choir or cantor having a part in it. The Gloria is intoned by the priest or, if appropriate, by a cantor or by the choir; but it is sung either by everyone together, or by the people alternately with the choir, or by the choir alone. It is preferable that the responsorial Psalm be sung, at least as far as the people's response is concerned. The Alleluia constitutes a rite or act in itself. It is sung by all while standing, and led by the choir or cantor. The supplication Agnus Dei is, as a rule, sung by the choir or cantor with the congregation responding. While the priest is receiving the Sacrament, the Communion chant is begun. The singing is continued for as long as the Sacrament is being administered to the faithful. This is sung either by the choir alone or by the choir or cantor with the people.

[netmilsmom]

I think that Charismatic Catholics deserve their own rite.

My DH is an Usher and therefore an EMHC. I think in some parishes, the blue haired nuns would be my LAST choice for EMHCs!

[frogjerk]

In parishes, there is no choice: watch in silence as the celebrant gives Communion to the elite laypeople who have been selected as official "eucharistic ministers."

Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist should be used in extraordinary circumstances. Not every Mass every Sunday. How about waiting to "receive" Holy Communion rather than running up to "take" Holy Communion. This is creating the appearance of a privileged class of the laity.

[netmilsmom]

Our sign of peace is pretty tame. When we camp, OY! I’ve been to some parishes where that’s longer than communion!

[m4629]

3. Curb the announcements.

I agree. Also please avoid letting somone with a HEAVY accent to do the announcement, even tho it seems to be the PC thing to do these days.

[Tax-chick]

In my parish, ushers and Ministers of Communion are different people, but neither of our nuns (nice ladies!) is physically up to either job. I like to get together with them just to chat, though. The one with Alzheimer’s was in the Coast Guard during World War II!

I’ve been to “Charismatic Masses” in which prayer or singing in tongues is a part, and I think that’s fine as long as it’s clearly stated upfront that this is what will go on. On other occasions, I’ve been to “regular” Masses with charismatic prayer, for healing, offered afterward. “Pentecostal,” whether Catholic or Protestant, is an experience that shouldn’t be just dropped on the unaware!

[Tax-chick]

The Spanish congregation can go overboard, and our previous pastor, now retired, was very social. We’d do five verses and a guitar-and-viola interlude! Our new pastor isn’t quite as free-and-easy, but he’s loosened up since coming to the parish.

As I said above, I’m of two minds. Although I have personal preferences about liturgy, I’m so happy to be at Mass - and especially to see our growing Spanish congregation - that details don’t really matter to me. Mass in Vietnamese with gongs? Just fine!

[giotto]

How about just one general suggestion: STOP PANDERING! The Mass is what it is--or rather, it should be what it used to be: Stately, dignified, mysterious, solemn, deeply moving, enigmatic, inscrutable, sublime, transcendent. Like the works of Bach, it was simultaneously ancient yet amazingly fresh and modern. Vatican II introduced the notion that people are too brutish and stupid to comprehend the Latin liturgy, too hyperactive to appreciate Gregorian Chant, too self-centered to want to devote 45 minutes of their Sunday worshiping God.

My prediction is that, if the liturgy were to be restored to its pre-Vatican II form, Mass attendance would increase exponentially.

[perez24]

My comment had to do more with her style, i.e. “I’m such a talented singer/musician I can’t believe I’m stuck with you hicks.”

[perez24]

My comment had to do more with her style, i.e. “I’m such a talented singer/musician I can’t believe I’m stuck with you hicks.”

[Salvation]

What a great article. I agree with all her suggestions!

[Salvation]

Many pastors (as ours does) have to pick their battles. Our pastor is improving our Mass each year since he came five years ago. I believe we will now see some leaps with the New Liturgy!

BTW, sending this to my priest. Thanks for the post.

[franky8]

I did a market study for my parish in the mid 1960s and only 25% of those receiving the bulletin ever read them.

[netmilsmom]

Actually, I wouldn’t mind Spanish with guitars or Vietnamese with gongs, but when all the music at an English mass sounds like a game show, I have a problem.

This is how it was a couple weeks ago in Mid-MI

(cue jazzy music)
Lamb of God (da dum dum dum) You who takes away our sins (da da da da) forgive uuuussssss (ding) (repeat 3X)

Seriously. They don’t even try to use the GIRM.

And I said to a Protestant friend we were camping with, I love Praise music. That is when I can sing along. When you have one guy in the front having his own solo and he “feels it”, I’m shaking my head.

[Tax-chick]

When you have one guy in the front having his own solo and he “feels it”, I’m shaking my head.

I agree. Our perspective is always, "What will work for the congregation?" That means, among other things, not expecting them to sing Gregorian chant, but we can still work it in if we're creative. We also do English or Latin pieces sometimes, as choir or solo numbers.

[netmilsmom]

That’s the ticket!
I really want to do the responses. I don’t need the “Church Idol” in the front doing them for me.

[blackpacific]

I’m just chiming in, but why not try the Missal of 1962? We have been attending a tridentine liturgy weekly for three years now, and we love it. We have Chant, we have polyphony, we have solos now and then, and we have a very peaceful beautiful liturgy. Why reinvent the wheel? Oh, and we have coffee and donuts twice a month!

[AnAmericanMother]

Oh -- I see, you were criticizing the organist! (I should have picked that up from the use of the word "perform".)

Not bragging, but explaining: I used to be an Episcopalian, and they may be heretics, but their music is second to none. I started singing with the Cathedral children's choir at age 6 and never stopped. Our last Piskie parish choir toured, made commercial recordings, sang at Spoleto, on the Protestant Hour on public radio, etc. So I've seen an awful lot of musicians, including plenty of professionals, over the years.

My experience is that the better the musician, the less of that "I'm such a talented musician" nonsense you get. Our current music director is the best man I've ever worked for, bar none. He has a doctorate in organ performance from Juilliard and a double masters in organ and composition from U.O. in Eugene (which is Early Music Central), as well as doing a Fulbright in France at the Lyon Conservatory. He has forgotten more about music theory than I will ever know. He plays the organ like an angel, can sight read anything, and sings beautifully. And if you listen up, he will impart knowledge worth gold any time he opens his mouth.

But he is the kindest, nicest, most humble man you could ever meet. There are lots of amateurs in our choir, some of whom don't really work as hard as they should to get things right, and he is very, very patient with them, doesn't even roll his eyes. I guess if you're really that good, you aren't a bit insecure and you don't have a thing to prove to anybody.

[perez24]

The percentage probably hasn’t gotten any better now, but reading major sections of the bulletin is a waste of time.

I’m not sure how announcing that the All-U-Can-Eat Spaghetti Dinner hosted by the Knights of Columbus is coming up on Friday...5 bucks apiece and no more than 20 bucks per family...contributes to the liturgy.

OTOH, I could just zone out for a couple of minutes and read the bulletin on the way.

[Miss Marple]

I have to agree with you.

We have too many hymns that have a "show tune" feel, and although the words may be reverent, the melody and the rhythm are not reverent.

We have an associate priest who tells way too many jokes, and inserts jovial comments in parts of the mass which to me seem inappropriate. (Let's not even go to his joke about the Resurrection, which was totally inappropriate.)

Too many of our parish view the Sign of Piece as a time for glad-handing and chat, which detracts from the solemnity of the mass.

When Monsigneur is the celebrant, we have a more solemn mass with explanations of the readings and occasional explanations of something in the mass, all of which are done in a dignified manner. Unfortunately, he can't be at every mass.

And I wish someone would tell the eucharistic ministers that they shouldn't wear pedal pushers, shorts, too-tight tops, and sandals.

[redhead]

LOL! We don’t have to worry about this in the Byzantine Rite. We stand for the entire service (except during the Epistle), the whole congregation chants in response to Father’s acclamations, back and forth,in the Divine Liturgy composed by St. John Chrysostom himself. There is no instrumentation, no handshaking, and all communicants receive on the tongue in both species, from a golden spoon. What’s to improve??