Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope's decision is "disastrous", says Dutch bishop
Radio Netherlands Worldwide ^ | 02-02-2009 | Rob Kievit

Posted on 02/02/2009 10:50:10 AM PST by annalex

Bishop Ad van Luyn (photo: Diocese of Rotterdam)
Bishop Ad van Luyn
(photo: Diocese of Rotterdam)

Pope Benedict XVI
Pope Benedict XVI

Professor Jean-Pierre Wils Photo: Radboud Univ
Professor Jean-Pierre Wils (2009)
Photo: Radboud University

Roman Catholic Bishop Ad van Luyn of Rotterdam has said that Pope Benedict's decision to rehabilitate renegade British Bishop Richard Williamson is "disastrous". Speaking on public television, Bishop Van Luyn said that Williamson's denial of the Holocaust and its gas chambers are "shocking, totally ahistoric, and at odds with the second Vatican Council [the 1962-65 church reform]".

A professor of theology and ethics at the Roman Catholic Radboud University in Nijmegen is leaving the church over the issue. Professor Jean-Pierre Wils told Radio Netherlands Worldwide

[More at source...]

(Excerpt) Read more at radionetherlands.nl ...


TOPICS: Ecumenism
KEYWORDS: excommunicationsspx; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Mrs. Don-o

Do you remember the dreadful Papal visit in 1985? The Dutch (inside and outside the Church) treated the Pope terribly.


41 posted on 02/02/2009 11:55:48 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
on account of SSPX’s views on theology and liturgy, not Williamson’s historical idiocy.

No kidding! From the picture, Bishop van Luyn doesn't look old enough to have participated in the infamous Dutch Catechism of the 60s (though I've seen house organ pictures of people I worked with that should have been labeled "1956 photo"!), but the spirit of rebellion apparently lives! I can't help wondering if he's been planning to leave since Benedict XVI was elected, and this has stirred enough comment to make it a good PR precipating event!

42 posted on 02/02/2009 12:07:21 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: livius
I read that more people attend SSPX Sunday masses in France than attend the regular Catholic Sunday masses in the French dioceses.

Yes -- I read that that was why the French bishops opposed Summorum Pontificum. (No, I don't understand the logic either!)

43 posted on 02/02/2009 12:10:08 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
A search in yahoo! News for "Bishop Richard Williamson" reveals at least 15 pages worth of articles. How often would you say it is that we here on FR are having in depth discussions about stories that have not significantly hit the mainstream. It is the primary reason why I come here actually.
44 posted on 02/02/2009 12:13:28 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maryz

It’s professor Wils who is leaving, not the bishop. Not yet.


45 posted on 02/02/2009 12:19:45 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Oops! I’ll have to read more carefully in the future! :(


46 posted on 02/02/2009 12:36:50 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: livius; Titanites; annalex; presidio9
>The mass media tends to overlook important developing stories in culture and religion

I stand by my point
that we have a lot of threads
about this topic.

A friend of mine runs
a Catholic-centric site
on psychology.

On discussion boards
(he frequents a great many)
interest is low

about Williamson.
So, yeah, I can see some threads,
but I think Freepers

are somewhat alone
thinking this topic is "hot"
even with Christians.

47 posted on 02/02/2009 1:48:22 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Lovely poem.


48 posted on 02/02/2009 1:51:18 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Well, then, just skip on to the next topic. These posts are getting a lot of replies, so while it may not be of interest to you, it’s clearly of interest to other people here. That’s what FR is all about.


49 posted on 02/02/2009 1:54:18 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
but I think Freepers are somewhat alone thinking this topic is "hot" even with Christians.

Who said anybody thought this topic was particularly "hot" with Christians? I posted it because of the outrage from the MSM that keeps covering it. As far as Catholics are concerned, this is a non-story, because the Pope did exactly the right thing. Most of the outrage seems to come from non-Catholics who seem to view excommunication as some sort of punishment the the Pope might dole out as he sees fit. Personally, I'm glad that this thread gave me the opportunity to educate a least a Couple of them.

None of this sould seem like rocket science to someone who has auch an artificially high regard for his own intellect that he writes his posts in verse form.

50 posted on 02/02/2009 1:58:39 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PatriotGirl827

Well speaking as a non Catholic ( but more and more contemplating joining ) this really doesn’t look bad to me.

Yes the press is making a big ballyhoo of it. Just like they did when they were shocked to find out Benedict was going to promote Catholic beliefs.

They are just upset because they cannot control the Pontiff by their silly and shrill hollering.


51 posted on 02/02/2009 5:06:43 PM PST by festus (Politics makes for strange bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: annalex; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

52 posted on 02/02/2009 5:07:28 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; livius
None of the "Econe Four" will ever become a bishop in any practical sense.
First, in the most practical sense, they already are. I was confirmed by one of them. Second, I think that very soon a Personal Prelature will exist and they will each (well maybe three of four) will have Titular Sees and worldwide jurisdiction as does Opus Dei. YMMV.
53 posted on 02/02/2009 5:10:55 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: festus
contemplating joining

You are in the right place. Please don't hesitate to ask your Catholic friends here on the religion forum any questions; this is a very good source of devotional material, encouragement and learning.

54 posted on 02/02/2009 6:17:40 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: narses

I think the personal prelature solution will probably be the one the Pope adopts. However, I think he wants the good ideas behind the SSPX to have more influence and not to be off in a sort of special space.

When this whole thing came up a couple of weeks ago, I didn’t imagine he was going to integrate the SSPX into the larger Church and I’d never even really considered that possibility. I didn’t think he’d appoint any SSPX bishop to be the ordinary in a regular, say, French diocese.

But the more I think about it, the more I wonder, why not? The French church is almost dead, aside from the SSPX - so why not appoint one of these bishops to a French diocese?


55 posted on 02/02/2009 7:57:51 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: livius

What totally amazes me is the fact that the very same people who are beating up on Benedict for this, have NO PROBLEM whatsoever with Obama attempting to “rehabilitate” The President of Iran - also an admitted Holocaust denier. The Pope and Bp. Williamson are powerless figureheads, and very few people listen to them anyway. But Obama and that nutcase over in Iran can do some real damage. Neither Benedict or Williamson have their finger on any nuclear red buttons. Again, the total hypocrisy of the secular media.


56 posted on 02/02/2009 8:32:19 PM PST by Cookie123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Maybe he's worried that the SSPX will undermine the Dutch post-Vatican II success story.

I believe the number of Dutch seminarians has recently doubled from 2 to 4. We wouldn't want such a beautiful springtime to be darkened by traditionalist destruction, would we? < /sarc>

57 posted on 02/02/2009 8:58:20 PM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future"- Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

It may well not be a formal doctrinal issue, however, the Church should not allow bigoted ahistorical idiots to be Bishops.

The man should be removed from his office of Bishop, not excommunicated—if under canon law that is possible.

The first German pope in many centuries....who reinstates a Holocaust denier? Someone at the Vatican failed to do their homework BIG TIME on this one...


58 posted on 02/02/2009 9:37:22 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cookie123

The Pope is not a figurehead. He has real authority over 1 billion Catholics. Unlike some democratic leaders elected by TV talking heads and Chicago crooks that come to mind.


59 posted on 02/02/2009 10:19:17 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

It is not written anywhere that bishops may NOT speak their mind as private citizens; however, a bishop is primarily a teacher of his flock, so I agree that he has a duty to separate his historical convictions from his pastoral work.


60 posted on 02/02/2009 10:21:30 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson