Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican, "God made people out of pre-human apes."
Catholic News Service ^ | 5/28/08 | Carol Glatz

Posted on 05/28/2008 10:38:31 AM PDT by Keli Kilohana

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- While apes evolved naturally into pre-human creatures, it was the will and desire of God that turned them into humans, an article in the Vatican newspaper said.

"The formation of human beings necessitated a particular contribution by God, though it remains that their emergence was brought about by natural causes" of evolution, it said.

(Excerpt) Read more at catholicnews.com ...


TOPICS: Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: evolution; pope; prehuman; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: Keli Kilohana
If the RC Church denies the miracle of creation, how long will it be until it denies the miracle of the Virgin Birth?

This is NOT a statement by the Roman Catholic Church.

No "missing link" fossil between apes and humans has ever been found. Humans did not "come from" apes.

21 posted on 05/28/2008 11:14:06 AM PDT by Elvina (I am not wearing a burkha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

primitive people wandering around in deserts with not enough food can imagine lots of things...


22 posted on 05/28/2008 11:17:28 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana
Maybe there's extraterrestrial life in the universe.

What does the Vatican know, and when did they know it !!!
23 posted on 05/28/2008 11:19:03 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enosh

“How does a virgin get pregnant” .............. Errrrr, the same way they always have? In the back seat of a car?


24 posted on 05/28/2008 11:20:41 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Where have all our Great Leaders gone? Certainly there must be one out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

That is the stupidest statement I’ve seen here this week, and that’s saying something.


25 posted on 05/28/2008 11:27:16 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Elvina
No "missing link" fossil between apes and humans has ever been found.

There are plenty of candidates that would fit this description, so I don't think this is a fair statement. I think it might be more accurate to say that science doesn't agree as to what human ancestors were.

26 posted on 05/28/2008 11:30:33 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana
I've searched the Scripture pretty carefully and can't find the verses that explain why Jesus taught the Old Testament verbatim. If we came from apes or pond scum, you would think Jesus or His Apostles would have said, “You know, Moses was speaking metaphorically when he said God created us from mud and in 6 literal days. He also taught that sexual sin was the cause of the destruction of Sodom and the Earth was destroyed by a worldwide flood. If these “scientists” are correct, the Jesus was a liar and we have wasted 2000 years following a fraud.

As a Christian, we are REQUIRED to believe in a virgin birth for our Christ. Can science prove or disprove that? We are REQUIRED to believe that Jesus was dead on the cross, yet rose from the dead after 3 days in the grave. Can science prove or disprove that? When I became "born again", I accepted the Word of God literally and Spiritually in total, word for word. I have been impressed that the Creation model has withstood the scrutiny of the nay sayers for decades now and am satisfied that God has done and can do what He says He can do.

The problem with adding to, or subtracting from Scriptures, and it's designed meaning, is you end up being one of the churches spoken of in Revelation that are asleep and lukewarm. You don't have the luxury of taking what you want from Scripture and deny the rest. Either God tells the truth or He is a liar and therefore not God. I learned early on that God's people will be persecuted so why not put your full faith in Jesus and to hell with the rest. They will just lead the masses to destruction. Believing in evolution is just that important to your salvation. I don't think there will be some sort of middle ground for the judgment of what we believe. We are saved by our faith, not anything else.

27 posted on 05/28/2008 11:32:44 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
In order for the Virgin Birth to occur and for us to agree with it, God only required a single miraculous act which was then properly reported and recorded in scripture.

In order for Genesis to be literally correct over a century of collected archaeological, anthropological, and geological evidence and scientific observation would need to be dismissed.

These are unrelated questions.

28 posted on 05/28/2008 11:43:39 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana

not only is this blasphemy but it’s venal and weak.

Instead of simply pointing out the failures of the atheists in their ‘evolution theory’, we now have one of the last bastions of traditional faith volunteering to be co-opted by those who would gladly deny the existence not only of Jesus but of the Creator himself.

Count me out. This is the Jews for Jesus equivalent for Catholics. Total insanity.


29 posted on 05/28/2008 11:43:53 AM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana

Instilling ethos and ego is a pretty big ex nihilo miracle, dude.

You try it with a computer or other machine and tell us how far you get.


30 posted on 05/28/2008 11:45:48 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ. For it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believes. To the Jew first and also to the Gentile.


31 posted on 05/28/2008 11:46:07 AM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
When I became "born again", I accepted the Word of God literally and Spiritually in total, word for word.

That was your choice. Nothing in Scripture demands that you take every word literally. You also run the risk that your faith could be totally shattered with the revelation of an undeniable scientific discovery which God blesses us with from time to time.

Personally, I see literalists as knowing all the words but never quite understanding the message. As to Creation, I have no desire to tell God how He should have done it. I'm simply content to know that He did... how He did it is immaterial as far as my faith is concerned.

32 posted on 05/28/2008 11:51:22 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana
Also Sprach Zarathustra


33 posted on 05/28/2008 11:57:56 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
“That is the stupidest statement I’ve seen here this week, and that’s saying something.”

Rather than throwing insults at people who disagree with your evolutionist views - why not answer the question? Just why do we still have Apes today when according to the writer of the posted story - they developed into pre-humans? That is not “the stupidest statement”, its a just a simple question..

34 posted on 05/28/2008 11:58:43 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

If the apes were less survivable than their human counterparts, why did the less survivable version... well, survive?

That’s your question, right?


35 posted on 05/28/2008 12:02:22 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Different books of the Bible were written in different literary styles. Some were literal, historical texts.

Others, allegorical, like “blood up to the reins of the horses”. Seriously, that’s a lot of blood - it is most certainly an allegorical statement.

The Word, and the Holy Spirit, remain constant throughout time - but those created in God’s image don’t/didn’t have the capacity to understand things like “billions of years” or “replicative DNA”. These things had to be presented in a manner that didn’t blow the minds of the first people to read the Word.


36 posted on 05/28/2008 12:06:01 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I am no supporter of the RCC, but I have no reason to believe the RCC believes what this idiot says.


37 posted on 05/28/2008 12:10:04 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana

The one thing I’ve noticed on FR the last few years is how supposedly conservative people use liberal tactics to make their point, truth no longer matters, just put it in a headline and it becomes truth for the ignorant.


38 posted on 05/28/2008 12:12:22 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki

The biggest similarity in “debate tactics” that I’ve seen, and that surprises me, is the almost identical tactics used by atheist evos and liberals in general.


39 posted on 05/28/2008 12:19:23 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Keli Kilohana
If the RC Church denies the miracle of creation, how long will it be until it denies the miracle of the Virgin Birth?

Well, St. Augustine wrote 1600 years ago that the creation narrative in Genesis was written in a manner that was a condescension to our limited ability to understand. I suppose that would qualify in your book as "denying the miracle of creation"?

If so, since we still haven't denied the Virgin Birth, I'd say the clock is at 1600 years and still running.

Instead of spending your time trying to make Catholics look bad, why don't you worry about the multitudinous heresies running around among liberal Protestants, who not only deny the Virgin Birth, but also the divinity of Christ, the inspiration of the Scriptures, the traditional Christian teaching on sexual morality, etc. ...

40 posted on 05/28/2008 12:26:33 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson