Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 04/19/2004 7:52:52 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

This thread has 183 abuse reports. It’s now locked. Maybe you can all get along better on the next thread.



Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
AP ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/10/2004 9:37:27 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Eastern Religions; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Islam; Judaism; Mainline Protestant; Orthodox Christian; Other Christian; Other non-Christian; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS: family; fellowship; food; history; humor; interpretation; pets; scripture; shopping; sports; tradition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 5,761-5,762 next last
To: Invincibly Ignorant
Mat 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
"God with us" when referring to the birth of Jesus Christ certainly sounds like Matthew thought Jesus was "God with us".
Why is this such a gem? Yeshua, who will rule and sit on David's throne in God's kingdom, in the "athid lavo" (millenium if you will), this entire concept cannot be considered "God with us"?

Not when considering the context:

Mat 1:21 "She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins."
Mat 1:22 Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet:
Mat 1:23 "BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL," which translated means, "GOD WITH US."

The bible is referring to Jesus Christ, when in the flesh as "God with Us" not "God will be with us in the future millenial kingdom".

1,421 posted on 03/27/2004 10:09:21 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1418 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Ah. So that's what they're called? :-) Joh 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. Thomas called Jesus "Lord" AND "God". My previous response covers this as well.

Thomas calls the resurrected Christ "God". Not only that, he calls him "My God". He doesn't say "You who will sit on the throne in the future and thus can be considered God." He calls him "My Lord AND my God."

I believe that Thomas fully understood that the messiah was God in the flesh.

1,422 posted on 03/27/2004 10:12:24 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1419 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
So, we CLEARLY see that "worship" most certainly is NOT limited to worship of God. It is irrefutable! In fact, the term can even apply to "worship" of demons!

If this were the only evidence then you might have a point. But take into account the totality of scripture and it's pretty convincing. Steven, you are left with a number of facts:

1. Jesus directly refers to himself as "I AM", identifying himself as the eternal God.
2. The Pharisees recognize that he is claiming to be the eternal God and want to kill him for it.
3. The author of Hebrews refers to Jesus as God.
4. The book of John attests that Christ pre-existed.
5. Paul says that Jesus Christ took part in the creation of the world, everything was created through him and for him.
6. Thomas recognized him as God, calling him so.
7. Matthew refers to him as "God with US" (not will be with us).
8. Revelation:

Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they [also] which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
Rev 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Compare that to:

Isa 44:6 Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I [am] the first, and I [am] the last; and beside me [there is] no God.

Who is being referred to in verse 8 but Jesus Christ?

1,423 posted on 03/27/2004 10:35:22 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Still makes perfect sense within that context. Unless you're retroactively trying to read a pagan Man/god theology into Hebrew scriptures.
1,424 posted on 03/28/2004 8:13:24 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1421 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Ah. So that's what they're called? :-) Joh 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. Thomas called Jesus "Lord" AND "God". My previous response covers this as well.

Thomas calls the resurrected Christ "God". Not only that, he calls him "My God". He doesn't say "You who will sit on the throne in the future and thus can be considered God." He calls him "My Lord AND my God."

You were there? I believe he was looking at the Messiah and praising God for what He had done. He doesn't say I know you are God in the flesh. We can play the "doesn't say" game all day long.

1,425 posted on 03/28/2004 8:26:04 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1422 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I believe that Thomas fully understood that the messiah was God in the flesh.

I know you have to. Wouldn't want anyone to think you were wandering away from the "United Magesterium"? Would we? :-)

1,426 posted on 03/28/2004 8:27:53 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1422 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
1. Jesus directly refers to himself as "I AM", identifying himself as the eternal God.Read this and you'll realize how silly this statement is. http://www.torahofmessiah.com/iam.html

2. The Pharisees recognize that he is claiming to be the eternal God and want to kill him for it.

The Pharisees were wrong just as they were wrong about Him profaning the Sabbath for which they wanted to stone him for. You really ought to pay attention to some of the previous points I made.

3. The author of Hebrews refers to Jesus as God.

ah yes, more interpretation presented as fact.

4. The book of John attests that Christ pre-existed.

Only if you take "the Word made flesh" literally.

5. Paul says that Jesus Christ took part in the creation of the world, everything was created through him and for him.

Another man/god interpretation. God created with the Messianic plan in mind yes.

6. Thomas recognized him as God, calling him so.

Just explain why this interpretation is full of it. :-)

7. Matthew refers to him as "God with US" (not will be with us).

God was with us in the execution of His messianic plan. 8. Revelation:Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they [also] which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen. Rev 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Compare that to:

Isa 44:6 Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I [am] the first, and I [am] the last; and beside me [there is] no God.

Lord = Master. Doesn't always mean Doug.

I would post you all the claims by Yeshua in NT commentary that he refers to himself as a "prophet". And all the times he instructed his disciples to worship and pray to God. Which would far outnumber you labored and tortured interpretations but I wouldn't want to bore you.

1,427 posted on 03/28/2004 8:39:51 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; Invincibly Ignorant
I believe that Thomas fully understood that the messiah was God in the flesh.

And Peter didn't.

Matthew 16:
[16] Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."
[17] And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven.

1,428 posted on 03/28/2004 9:10:49 AM PST by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1422 | View Replies]

To: restornu
HMM. Completely different expressions. On one hand I'm happy for them but on the other when I see all the women on the Hill I think "Oh great. Just what they need. More of them". I'm sure they all aren't like what we see in the media but I have no heros .
1,429 posted on 03/28/2004 1:08:12 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1416 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Interesting pictures. Take off the tablecloths and put them in suits, and they'd look like a group of Spaniards or Italians.
1,430 posted on 03/28/2004 1:17:41 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1414 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Hi Cindy!
1,431 posted on 03/28/2004 1:19:48 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1429 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Hi Mal
1,432 posted on 03/28/2004 2:19:31 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; CindyDawg
Did you read (mash pics)the progress of part 1 & 2 that is being made?
1,433 posted on 03/28/2004 2:52:02 PM PST by restornu ("Faith...is daring the soul to go beyond what the eyes refuse to see."J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1430 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Nah. I just looked at the pictures (grin) Seriously!
1,434 posted on 03/28/2004 2:53:25 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1433 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
sorry no comprendo!
1,435 posted on 03/28/2004 4:58:40 PM PST by restornu ("Faith...is daring the soul to go beyond what the eyes refuse to see."J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1434 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Lo siento. Cindydawg es un "freeper" perezoso :')
1,436 posted on 03/28/2004 5:36:32 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1435 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Don't you mean "una 'freeper' perezosa"? ;o)
1,437 posted on 03/28/2004 6:03:15 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Haven't yet, no. Busy weekend.
1,438 posted on 03/28/2004 6:03:46 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1433 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
If I can't spell in English, you think I'm going to do better in Spanish? lol. I believe it is un, not sure about perezasa though. I'll check with my coaches manana :')
1,439 posted on 03/28/2004 6:12:43 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1437 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
It's no savy (ms?) around here anyway:')
1,440 posted on 03/28/2004 6:14:01 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1438 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 5,761-5,762 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson