Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The relics in at the Wittenburg Castle Church of Luther's Day
The Reformation: A Narrative History Related by Contemporary Observers and Participants | 1964 | Hans J. Hillerbrand, ed.

Posted on 01/03/2004 6:49:39 AM PST by drstevej

Source: Hans J. Hillerbrand, ed. The Reformation: A Narrative History Related by Contemporary Observers and Participants (Harper and Row, Inc. 1964, Reprint Baker Book House, 1978) pp. 47-49.

The Castle Church at Wittenberg, where Luther probably posted his ninety-five theses, was famous for its extensive collection of relics, as the following excerpt from what might be called the official catalogue's shows.

... Three pieces of the city where the Virgin Mary was born. One piece of a yarn which she spun. One piece of the house where she lived at the age of fourteen. Two pieces of the city of Mt Zion where Mary lived. Two pieces of the room where Mary was greeted by the angel. Five particles of the milk of the Virgin Mary. One piece of the tree where Mary nursed the Lord near the Garden of Balsam. Four pieces of the hair of Mary. Three pieces of the shirt of Mary. Three pieces of one robe of Mary. Eight pieces of other robes of Mary. Four pieces of the belt of Mary. Seven pieces of the veil of Mary. Two pieces of the veil of Mary which was sprinkled with the blood of Christ under the Cross. One piece of the city where Mary died. One piece of the wax candle given to Our Lady when she died. Six pieces of the grave of Mary. Two pieces of the earth of the grave of Mary. One piece of the place where Mary ascended into heaven. VI. A silver picture of the little baby Jesus. Four pieces of the city where the Lord Jesus was born. One piece of the diaper in which he was wrapped. Thirteen pieces of the manger of Jesus. One piece of the cradle. Two pieces of the hay. One piece of the straw on which the Lord lay when he was born. One piece of the gold and of the myrrh which the Three Kings offered unto the Lord. One piece of the city where the Lord Jesus was circumcised. VII. Four pieces of the mountain on which the Lord Jesus fasted. Two pieces of the city where Christ preached the Lord's Prayer. One piece of the stone on which Jesus stood while weeping over Jerusalem. One piece of the stone from which Christ got on the donkey. Two pieces of the ground where the Lord Christ was arrested. VIII.... Five pieces of the table on which the Lord Christ held the Last Supper with his disciples. One piece of the bread of which Christ ate with his disciples during the Last Supper. IX.... One piece of the land which was bought for the thirty pieces of silver for which Christ was betrayed. One piece of the Holy Land. Three pieces of the stone where the Lord sweated blood. One piece of the ground where the Lord sweated blood. One piece of the stone sprinkled with the blood of Christ. X. Three pieces of the Mount of Olives and of the rod of Aaron. Two pieces of the rod of Moses. One piece of the burning bush which Moses saw. One piece of an object sprinkled with the blood of Christ. Eleven pieces of Mount Calvary. Two pieces of the Mount of Olives. XI. One piece of the cloth with which the Lord wiped his disciples' feet. One piece of the robe of Christ: One piece of the seamless robe of Christ. One piece of the robe of Christ. One piece of his purple robe. Two pieces of the cloth which St Veronica received from the Lord. Three pieces of the white robe in which the Lord was ridiculed by Herod . Three pieces of the cloth with which our Lord's holy eyes were blindfolded. One piece of the beard of the Lord Jesus. XII. One piece of the wax of the candles which touched the sudarium of Christ. One piece of the wedge with which the cross of Christ was held. Three pieces of the stone on which the cross stood. Three pieces of the place where the cross of Christ was found. Twelve pieces of the column where the Lord Christ was scourged and flogged.

The Eight Aisle. I. One piece of the rope with which Jesus was tied. Three pieces of the rod with which the Lord Jesus was scourged. Three pieces of the whip with which the Lord Jesus was flogged. One piece of the stone upon which the Lord Jesus sat when he was crowned. One piece of the stone which was crushed while the Lord carried the cross. One piece of the sponge with which the Lord was given vinegar and gall.... III. Two pieces of the crown of the Lord Jesus. Eight complete thorns of the crown of the Lord Jesus. IV. One large piece of one nail which was driven through the hands or feet of the Lord Jesus. V. A thorn which wounded the holy head of the Lord Jesus. VI. One piece of the holy cross.... VII. Three pieces of the holy cross. VIII. Three pieces of the three kinds of wood of the cross of Christ. IX. A particularly large piece from the holy cross. X. Twenty-five pieces of the holy cross. XI. One piece of the stone which lay on the grave of Christ. Twenty-two pieces of the grave of Christ. One piece of the stone from which Christ descended into heaven. XII. A casket lined with silver in which are found sixteen hundred and seventy-eight pieces. Seventy-six pieces of holy remains. Bones from holy places which on account of faded writing can no longer be read and identified. All in all : five thousand and five pieces. An indulgence of one hundred days for each piece. There are eight halls and each hall has an indulgence of one hundred and one days in addition. Blessed are those who participate therein.


Lucas Cranach, Wittemberger Heiligthumsbuch.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-416 next last
To: old and tired; drstevej
BTW, I am the proud owner of a first class relic of St. John Neumann.

So which part of St John's body do you own?

101 posted on 01/03/2004 7:22:30 PM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: old and tired; Gamecock
*** I am the proud owner of a first class relic of St. John Neumann.***

I am the proud owner of the notebook containing the formulas for Royal Crown Cola and all the Nehi products.

Pilgrimmages;
M-F 8 to 5 (by reservation only)
102 posted on 01/03/2004 7:28:27 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Does that include grape Nehi?
103 posted on 01/03/2004 8:00:32 PM PST by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Does Rome consider Cardinal Mahoney a heretic?

Maybe not officially, but I certainly hope so. None of his proteges are being promoted. That's a pretty good indication of Rome's opinion on the subject.

If not, how can you make such a pronouncement?

I just did. As long as we are being truthful in what we recognize, in this case the man is beyond explanation, we are welcome to speak our minds. Mahoney has no authority regarding dogma, although he thinks he does. He has more to damage the church in LA in his time there than has been done in almost any other diocese. What comes out of his mouth is usually heretical. He is a liturgical abuser - and foisted that abuse on the rest of us.

By what authority do you malign an Archbishop in communion with the bishop of Rome?

What difference does it make what his title is. I am a Catholic in full Communion with the church and I know the church teachings from Rome that he is supposed to preach. He doesn't do it. He's not the first and he won't be the last. And whether or not he's in communion with Rome is a good question. There've been rumors that he wants a split.

Doesn't your theology tell you such statements are out of bounds?

No.
104 posted on 01/03/2004 8:12:01 PM PST by Desdemona (Kempis' Imitation of Christ online! http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/imitation/imitation.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
You sound like young Luther! Love it.

Wanna be a cardinalette when I am elevated?
105 posted on 01/03/2004 9:04:48 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: RochesterFan
***Does that include grape Nehi?***

Yep.

The page is dated 2-1-51 and the reciple is for 1000 gallons of concentrate

250 gallons grape extract (formula on previous page)
156 pounds Amaranth
11 1/4 pounds brilliant blue
487 pounds citric acid (anhydrous)
103 gallons of 75% phosphoric acid
water to make 1000 galons

The formula for grape extract is more complicated...

By the way my grandfather noted that the cost per gallon of grape extract was $2.87 on 1-1-52 and $2.80 on 3-31-52. Something must have gotten cheaper!
106 posted on 01/03/2004 9:11:33 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
What's "Nehi"?

Thats a lot of phosphoric acid.

107 posted on 01/03/2004 9:43:16 PM PST by jude24 ("Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything thats even REMOTELY true!" -- H. Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Chero cola/Nehi/Royal Crown Cola -- Historical sketch

http://www.angelfire.com/tn/traderz/chero.html

This paragraph mentions my grandfather, Rufus Kamm.

"During this year, Mott felt the company needed an improved cola product, and called the company chemist, Rufus Kamm, to make one. Six months later, a new cola concentrate was sent for selective market testing. It was successful and given the brand name of Hatcher's original ginger ale, Royal Crown. A Nehi bottler named Grubb from Dothan, Alabama was one of the first to bottle the new Royal Crown Cola, later abbreviated to "RC"."


108 posted on 01/03/2004 9:55:27 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
I am the proud owner of the notebook containing the formulas for Royal Crown Cola and all the Nehi products.

Whoo boy! I know the recipes for moon pies and Little Debbies! We can rule the South after we also buy a taqueria chain to sell them in. We can also sell those cute little one dollar votive candles of the Queen of Heaven that are so popular. Some things never change, y'know.

109 posted on 01/03/2004 9:59:50 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Maybe we can coordinate it with...

The Protestant Relic Tour:


-1-   the Zippo Calvin used to set the fire under Servetus
-2-   the last five of Luther's 100 Theses including the one that says, "If the Pope is the vicar of Christ, why does he wear a dress?"
-3-   Zwingli's solo rendition of "Thanks for the Memories"
-4-   the original prescription for "the soveraigne drugge Arminianisme" prescribed to Bonnie England from Dr. Jesuit to purge her Calvinism.

110 posted on 01/03/2004 10:01:33 PM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; drstevej
Again, Luther's view on bigamy was not one many agreed with.

However, you have to admit that relics where big business in the 1500's. Churches competed with each other,and many fraud where placed forth. Some even given official sanction, and then removed and denounced.

This is history, not an attack. The tone of every one here is getting a little out of hand. The RCC has made an effort in the last 150 years to clean up the many false relics out there.
111 posted on 01/03/2004 10:16:56 PM PST by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
The tone of every one here is getting a little out of hand.

Obviously you've never enjoyed a Nehi or RCC. Those are Southern relics, and while we don't exactly worship them, it comes close. :)

112 posted on 01/03/2004 10:21:12 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona
*Consubstantiation.*

Paul wrote to the Corinthians: "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?" (1 Cor. 10:16). So when we receive Communion, we actually participate in the body and blood of Christ, not just eat symbols of them. Paul also said, "Therefore whoever eats the bread and drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. . . . For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself" (1 Cor. 11:27, 29). "To answer for the body and blood" of someone meant to be guilty of a crime as serious as homicide. How could eating mere bread and wine "unworthily" be so serious? Paul’s comment makes sense only if the bread and wine became the real body and blood of Christ.

113 posted on 01/04/2004 12:06:23 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham; Canticle_of_Deborah; All
I think this thread was intended to be a discussion on relics. Now, it looks like it is turning into an anti Luther page...

First off Cunningham -- I am a Lutheran -- just to let you know from the start.

Secondly Deborah -- Attributing Luther's sometimes odd beliefs (I submit his pamphlet --"The Jews and their Lies") to all Protestants is wrong. I think the problem here is that many Christians of the Roman Denomination think Luther is the Protestant Pope or we worship Luther and his works. This is just not so.

However, to come to his defense we must remember we are talking about a 16th Century man here. Although I am not one for Historical Critical Theology I think that when it comes down to men we must consider the times they lived in. If you read further about Luther's bigamy statements you would also find that because divorce was unthinkable at the time Luther reasoned that a woman who found herself in a sexless marriage could, with the consent of her husband, have a "secret marriage" with say a brother-in-law. Now, we must also remember that this was probably not because of the woman's "right" to have sex. It was probably because married women were expected to have children. Therefore it is a lot like Lot's daughters laying down with their father to ensure his "line". Or the tradition from the Old Testament that if a Woman becomes a widow, before she bears children, she is to marry her husbands next of kin....

Now, to address the relics issue. Although I do not own them or use them myself I really don't see a problem with other people having them if they enhance a worship experience. But I do have a problem with them being the object of worship and not God.

For instance when I was in Rome I found a rather large group of Philippina nuns prostrate before the jewel encrusted arm of a saint. I may be wrong but I really got the feeling that they were worshiping the arm and not God. Which then led me to think about Lenin's body laid out in Red Square and why it was there. Let us not replace the spiritual with the material.

In closing, I don't think Christians and I mean all Christians -- Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant -- should be fighting among themselves right now. We have a much more serious fight before us and we need to be together.
114 posted on 01/04/2004 3:08:01 AM PST by MizRiz9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Sir:

The Eastern Orthodox follow Holy Tradition, but we didn't have the Problems the Roman Catholics did. Holy Tradition is simply the oral teachings of the apostles, handed down.

The abuse of relics, etc. came from the Western Church.
115 posted on 01/04/2004 3:52:45 AM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("In Christ there is NO east or west.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Less than a year before the Heresiarch lost his faith, Luther was preaching Indulgences.

Now, the misuse of Indulgences or fake relics do not render those truths nugatory.

X. INDULGENCES 1471 The doctrine and practice of indulgences in the Church are closely linked to the effects of the sacrament of Penance. What is an indulgence?

"An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven, which the faithful Christian who is duly disposed gains under certain prescribed conditions through the action of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of the satisfactions of Christ and the saints."81

"An indulgence is partial or plenary according as it removes either part or all of the temporal punishment due to sin."82 The faithful can gain indulgences for themselves or apply them to the dead.83

The punishments of sin

1472 To understand this doctrine and practice of the Church, it is necessary to understand that sin has a double consequence. Grave sin deprives us of communion with God and therefore makes us incapable of eternal life, the privation of which is called the "eternal punishment" of sin. On the other hand every sin, even venial, entails an unhealthy attachment to creatures, which must be purified either here on earth, or after death in the state called Purgatory. This purification frees one from what is called the "temporal punishment" of sin. These two punishments must not be conceived of as a kind of vengeance inflicted by God from without, but as following from the very nature of sin. A conversion which proceeds from a fervent charity can attain the complete purification of the sinner in such a way that no punishment would remain.84

1473 The forgiveness of sin and restoration of communion with God entail the remission of the eternal punishment of sin, but temporal punishment of sin remains. While patiently bearing sufferings and trials of all kinds and, when the day comes, serenely facing death, the Christian must strive to accept this temporal punishment of sin as a grace. He should strive by works of mercy and charity, as well as by prayer and the various practices of penance, to put off completely the "old man" and to put on the "new man."85

In the Communion of Saints

1474 The Christian who seeks to purify himself of his sin and to become holy with the help of God's grace is not alone. "The life of each of God's children is joined in Christ and through Christ in a wonderful way to the life of all the other Christian brethren in the supernatural unity of the Mystical Body of Christ, as in a single mystical person."86

1475 In the communion of saints, "a perennial link of charity exists between the faithful who have already reached their heavenly home, those who are expiating their sins in purgatory and those who are still pilgrims on earth. between them there is, too, an abundant exchange of all good things."87 In this wonderful exchange, the holiness of one profits others, well beyond the harm that the sin of one could cause others. Thus recourse to the communion of saints lets the contrite sinner be more promptly and efficaciously purified of the punishments for sin.

1476 We also call these spiritual goods of the communion of saints the Church's treasury, which is "not the sum total of the material goods which have accumulated during the course of the centuries. On the contrary the 'treasury of the Church' is the infinite value, which can never be exhausted, which Christ's merits have before God. They were offered so that the whole of mankind could be set free from sin and attain communion with the Father. In Christ, the Redeemer himself, the satisfactions and merits of his Redemption exist and find their efficacy."88

1477 "This treasury includes as well the prayers and good works of the Blessed Virgin Mary. They are truly immense, unfathomable, and even pristine in their value before God. In the treasury, too, are the prayers and good works of all the saints, all those who have followed in the footsteps of Christ the Lord and by his grace have made their lives holy and carried out the mission in the unity of the Mystical Body."89

Obtaining indulgence from God through the Church

1478 An indulgence is obtained through the Church who, by virtue of the power of binding and loosing granted her by Christ Jesus, intervenes in favor of individual Christians and opens for them the treasury of the merits of Christ and the saints to obtain from the Father of mercies the remission of the temporal punishments due for their sins. Thus the Church does not want simply to come to the aid of these Christians, but also to spur them to works of devotion, penance, and charity.90

1479 Since the faithful departed now being purified are also members of the same communion of saints, one way we can help them is to obtain indulgences for them, so that the temporal punishments due for their sins may be remitted.

81 Paul VI, apostolic constitution, Indulgentiarum doctrina, Norm 1.

82 Indulgentiarum doctrina, Norm 2; Cf. Norm 3.

83 CIC, can. 994.

84 Cf. Council of Trent (1551): DS 1712-1713; (1563): 1820.

85 Eph 4:22, 24.

86 Indulgentiarum doctrina, 5.

87 Indulgentiarum doctrina, 5.

88 Indulgentiarum doctrina, 5.

89 Indulgentiarum doctrina, 5.

90 Cf. Indulgentiarum doctrina, 5.

DECREE CONCERNING INDULGENCES. Whereas the power of conferring Indulgences was granted by Christ to the Church; and she has, even in the most ancient times, used the said power, delivered unto her of God; the sacred holy Synod teaches, and enjoins, that the use of Indulgences, for the Christian people most salutary, and approved of by the authority of sacred Councils, is to be retained in the Church; and It condemns with anathema those who either assert, that they are useless; or who deny that there is in the Church the power of granting them. In granting them, however, It desires that, in accordance with the ancient and approved custom in the Church, moderation be observed; lest, by excessive facility, ecclesastical discipline be enervated. And being desirous that the abuses which have crept therein, and by occasion of which this honourable name of Indulgences is blasphemed by heretics, be amended and corrected, It ordains generally by this decree, that all evil gains for the obtaining thereof,--whence a most prolific cause of abuses amongst the Christian people has been derived,--be wholly abolished. But as regards the other abuses which have proceeded from superstition, ignorance, irreverence, or from what soever other source, since, by reason of the manifold corruptions in the places and provinces where the said abuses are committed, they cannot conveniently be specially prohibited; It commands all bishops, diligently to collect, each in his own church, all abuses of this nature, and to report them in the first provincial Synod; that, after having been reviewed by the opinions of the other bishops also, they may forthwith be referred to the Sovereign Roman Pontiff, by whose authority and prudence that which may be expedient for the universal Church will be ordained; that this the gift of holy Indulgences may be dispensed to all the faithful, piously, holily, and incorruptly.

116 posted on 01/04/2004 3:57:42 AM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
ON THE INVOCATION, VENERATION, AND RELICS, OF SAlNTS, AND ON SACRED IMAGES.

The holy Synod enjoins on all bishops, and others who sustain the office and charge of teaching, that, agreeably to the usage of the Catholic and Apostolic Church, received from the primitive times of the Christian religion, and agreeably to the consent of the holy Fathers, and to the decrees of sacred Councils, they especially instruct the faithful diligently concerning the intercession and invocation of saints; the honour (paid) to relics; and the legitimate use of images: teaching them, that the saints, who reign together with Christ, offer up their own prayers to God for men; that it is good and useful suppliantly to invoke them, and to have recourse to their prayers, aid, (and) help for obtaining benefits from God, through His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who is our alone Redeemer and Saviour; but that they think impiously, who deny that the saints, who enjoy eternal happiness in heaven, are to be invocated; or who assert either that they do not pray for men; or, that the invocation of them to pray for each of us even in particular, is idolatry; or, that it is repugnant to the word of God; and is opposed to the honour of the one mediator of God and men, Christ Jesus; or, that it is foolish to supplicate, vocally, or mentally, those who reign in heaven. Also, that the holy bodies of holy martyrs, and of others now living with Christ,-which bodies were the living members of Christ, and the temple of the Holy Ghost, and which are by Him to be raised unto eternal life, and to be glorified,--are to be venerated by the faithful; through which (bodies) many benefits are bestowed by God on men; so that they who affirm that veneration and honour are not due to the relics of saints; or, that these, and other sacred monuments, are uselessly honoured by the faithful; and that the places dedicated to the memories of the saints are in vain visited with the view of obtaining their aid; are wholly to be condemned, as the Church has already long since condemned, and now also condemns them.

Moreover, that the images of Christ, of the Virgin Mother of God, and of the other saints, are to be had and retained particularly in temples, and that due honour and veneration are to be given them; not that any divinity, or virtue, is believed to be in them, on account of which they are to be worshipped; or that anything is to be asked of them; or, that trust is to be reposed in images, as was of old done by the Gentiles who placed their hope in idols; but because the honour which is shown them is referred to the prototypes which those images represent; in such wise that by the images which we kiss, and before which we uncover the head, and prostrate ourselves, we adore Christ; and we venerate the saints, whose similitude they bear: as, by the decrees of Councils, and especially of the second Synod of Nicaea, has been defined against the opponents of images.

And the bishops shall carefully teach this,-that, by means of the histories of the mysteries of our Redemption, portrayed by paintings or other representations, the people is instructed, and confirmed in (the habit of) remembering, and continually revolving in mind the articles of faith; as also that great profit is derived from all sacred images, not only because the people are thereby admonished of the benefits and gifts bestowed upon them by Christ, but also because the miracles which God has performed by means of the saints, and their salutary examples, are set before the eyes of the faithful; that so they may give God thanks for those things; may order their own lives and manners in imitation of the saints; and may be excited to adore and love God, and to cultivate piety. But if any one shall teach, or entertain sentiments, contrary to these decrees; let him be anathema.

And if any abuses have crept in amongst these holy and salutary observances, the holy Synod ardently desires that they be utterly abolished; in such wise that no images, (suggestive) of false doctrine, and furnishing occasion of dangerous error to the uneducated, be set up. And if at times, when expedient for the unlettered people; it happen that the facts and narratives of sacred Scripture are portrayed and represented; the people shall be taught, that not thereby is the Divinity represented, as though it could be seen by the eyes of the body, or be portrayed by colours or figures.

Moreover, in the invocation of saints, the veneration of relics, and the sacred use of images, every superstition shall be removed, all filthy lucre be abolished; finally, all lasciviousness be avoided; in such wise that figures shall not be painted or adorned with a beauty exciting to lust; nor the celebration of the saints, and the visitation of relics be by any perverted into revellings and drunkenness; as if festivals are celebrated to the honour of the saints by luxury and wantonness.

In fine, let so great care and diligence be used herein by bishops, as that there be nothing seen that is disorderly, or that is unbecomingly or confusedly arranged, nothing that is profane, nothing indecorous, seeing that holiness becometh the house of God.

And that these things may be the more faithfully observed, the holy Synod ordains, that no one be allowed to place, or cause to be placed, any unusual image, in any place, or church, howsoever exempted, except that image have been approved of by the bishop: also, that no new miracles are to be acknowledged, or new relics recognised, unless the said bishop has taken cognizance and approved thereof; who, as soon as he has obtained some certain information in regard to these matters, shall, after having taken the advice of theologians, and of other pious men, act therein as he shall judge to be consonant with truth and piety. But if any doubtful, or difficult abuse has to be extirpated; or, in fine, if any more grave question shall arise touching these matters, the bishop, before deciding the controversy, shall await the sentence of the metropolitan and of the bishops of the province, in a provincial Council; yet so, that nothing new, or that previously has not been usual in the Church, shall be resolved on, without having first consulted the most holy Roman Pontiff.

<>End of quote<>

Exodus 7:10 When Pharao shall say to you, Shew signs; thou shalt say to Aaron: Take thy rod, and cast it down before Pharao, and it shall be turned into a serpent.

Matt 9:20 And behold a woman who was troubled with an issue of blood twelve years, came behind him, and touched the hem of his garment.

21 For she said within herself: If I shall touch only his garment, I shall be healed.

Matt 14:36 And they besought him that they might touch but the hem of his garment. And as many as touched, were made whole.

Acts 19:12 So that even there were brought from his body to the sick, handkerchiefs and aprons: and the diseases departed from them: and the wicked spirits went out of them.

Acts 5:15 Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and couches, that, when Peter came, his shadow at the least might overshadow any of them and they might be delivered from their infirmities.

16 And there came also together to Jerusalem a multitude out of the neighbouring cities, bringing sick persons and such as were troubled with unclean spirits: who were all healed.

117 posted on 01/04/2004 4:12:53 AM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Satan will use whatever means necessary. Fake apparitions, Heresiarchs,..many are those with itchy ears lusting after novelties.
118 posted on 01/04/2004 4:15:06 AM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
balderdash. antiscriptual claptrap.
119 posted on 01/04/2004 4:16:49 AM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Because it is a Sacramental, not a bloody act. The Mass is the action of Jesus, both priest and victim, offering Himself to God on our behalf as an act of propitiation.

All Christians do in the Mass is worship God the way He Himself taught us.

Your rejection of the Christian form of worship is based upon the heresies of sinful men. C'est la vie.

120 posted on 01/04/2004 4:21:08 AM PST by Catholicguy (MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-416 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson