Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge: 59% VOTE 'YES' FOR RECALL; 51% SCHWARZENEGGER, 30% FOR BUSTAMANTE, 13% MCCLINTOCK
Drudge

Posted on 10/07/2003 5:41:30 PM PDT by ambrose

EXIT POLLS SHOW LANDSLIDE: RECALL, SCHWARZENEGGER POISED FOR EASY WIN


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: exitpolls; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-455 next last
To: PhiKapMom
God Bless the President and his War master... Karl Rove.
341 posted on 10/07/2003 7:26:31 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert... the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It's hard to imagine someone like Ah-nold or even Reagan getting elected in any other country. In most countries, only long-serving members of the political establishment ever get elected. Having a rank outsider win and punch the established barnacle-encrusted status quo is one of the great strengths of our country. Even the election of Jesse Ventura served a purpose -- it let the two major parties in the state know that they had become too complacent and too detached from the voters.
342 posted on 10/07/2003 7:28:06 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; SBprone
Yes, it did work perfectly (although I doubt the "perfect storm" was necessarily planned that way - events often just take on a life of their own, outside of all efforts to control them). And, yes, SBprone, even though I supported Arnold all along, we need to pass along some pats-on-the-back to Tom and his supporters: For their support on Part 1 (which was crucial to the mandate) and for Tom largely staying away from attacks on Arnold in the debate and in the last week. He probably knew that his core support (the 12 or 13 percent) were social conservatives that simply couldn't go anywhere else - but would stay in the game with him in it.

In a funny way, he kept the coalition together, at least in part. And it was a coalition that could not otherwise stay together because of the particular make-up of the social conservative faction. They will never compromise, it's simply not in their make-up, and their standards are exceedingly high -- far beyond the reach of the remaining 85-90% of the population. So they sit at home (as many did in the '00 Presidential election) or they come out for their particular niche candidate -- as they did here.

I don't know if McClintock had this figured out in advance or not -- maybe he did. If he did, more power to him and may he have a great future.

343 posted on 10/07/2003 7:28:40 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Whew, watching Fox, and Susuan Estrich is going off on the demos and then Fox showed a close up of CeCe Connally of the Wash Compost and I never seen a womans lips pursed more.
344 posted on 10/07/2003 7:28:55 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
How's the funeral going over at CNN? Somebody needs to bottle this stuff and sell it.....
345 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:16 PM PDT by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
General Rove prepares to smash his opponents into oblivion again.
346 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:42 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Just dang. Think of the sunblock pale gray davis will need in Mexico. He'll be like a sponge soaking up all the supplies at the Pharmacias. Go Sponge Gray, go Sponge Gray go! Guess you Californians already told him that.
347 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:42 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Liberals view security like ostriches. Head in the sand, rear in the air. But they "feel" safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: RogerWilko
I don't see how they can stand it. First 2000, then 2002 and now 2003 (hopefully). While Arnold might not be the most qualified, just the pain it is causing them is worth the victory. In fact, that's what is probably causing them the most pain.
348 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:50 PM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Reaction in the McClintock camp to Schwarzenegger's apparent landslide victory was swift ..."

"Almost to a brave, one question permeated the reservations in the wake of the disaster ..."

HOW?

349 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:59 PM PDT by strela (Gray, Arnold Barada Recall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: strela
Good one! However, as Republicans, we are all winners tonight. I think conservatives will be impressed with Schwarzenegger.
350 posted on 10/07/2003 7:31:48 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Cu Roi
I'm sure Arianna would have been a lot less critical...

Especially after a couple of rounds of "bobbing for Ty-D-Bol"

351 posted on 10/07/2003 7:31:56 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
They are in a rare mood is right. Was living in CA when Reagan was elected and was so happy when he gave his acceptance speech. I remember having tears in my eyes sitting in the family room watching him speak! I was so happy! I feel so great that a Republican is going to be Governor of California.

352 posted on 10/07/2003 7:32:10 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Vote for Arnold -- Republican by Choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: All


353 posted on 10/07/2003 7:32:41 PM PDT by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: All
Does anyone know of any GOP officials (national party members, Schwarzenegger campaign staff) or major conservative figures who have openly asked where the Democrats were when Dems were accused of sexual mistreatment of women (since now they are gunning for Arnold)?

I am going to be running a story on the recall in the upcoming issue of the college paper and am trying to find quotes like that to provide a nice balance to the requisite mention I will have to give of the attacks on Arnold for womanizing.

I am looking for big name Repubs. I have googled and ran a LexisNexis search, but only found little-known people. Did Rush make any comments about the Dem hypocrisy perhaps?

If anybody knows of people speaking out on this, let me know. Thanks!

I have at least found some info on how the media are jumping on this Arnold stuff even though they ignored Juanita Broaddrick.
354 posted on 10/07/2003 7:33:06 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: strela
ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!! Arnold is upstairs at the Century Plaza -- Arnold will be brought down when the polls are closed to give his acceptance speech.

A new song tonight all cued up for Arnold.

Torres is a MORON!!!!!
355 posted on 10/07/2003 7:35:16 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Vote for Arnold -- Republican by Choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
I do believe this can be a problem in the wierd odd occassion, but I agree with your comments and the idea behind them. Good call.
356 posted on 10/07/2003 7:35:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You're not going to beieve this (Well, yes you will), but this is what the DUmmies think our government is suppose to be. They're 100% USSR. Brainwashed Socialists. Read this !!!

This Recall is worse than a defeat for Democrats

It is another serious blow to our form of government, and if you ask me, the very fact this recall is taking place at all is an indictment of our educational system.

Our country was not founded on absolute majority rule, but rather on majority rule with very careful protections for minority rights. Our government, and system of selecting our leaders, was set up by our founding fathers, to insulate politicians as much as possible, from they daily ebb and flow of public opinion so that they could make the tough decisions that would inevitably be required. Recalls, and other such nonsense were specifically not included in the constitution for these very reasons. They knew elected leaders would be paralyzed every time they have to make a tough decision if they knew they could be removed from office for it.

357 posted on 10/07/2003 7:37:23 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: bootyist-monk
If I am not mistaken, that is 59% of those that voted "Yes" to recall, not 59% of the total vote.

If I am wrong here someone please correct me.
358 posted on 10/07/2003 7:37:46 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
So much for the "last dying gasp of whites in California" Art. LOL
359 posted on 10/07/2003 7:37:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Yes. Note that, without McClintock's 13% of the voters, Part I would have gone down to defeat.
360 posted on 10/07/2003 7:38:30 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson