Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHICH MCCLINTOCK TO BELIEVE? TOM PROMISED HE WOULDN'T BE A SPOILER
KFI 640 | Matt Garrett

Posted on 10/01/2003 2:01:48 PM PDT by MattGarrett

On today's RECALL CENTRAL on KFI 640, they had the head of the "Lincoln Republicans" of Orange County. He stated that Tom McClintock had assured him that he would not stay in the race to play spoiler if it looked like he couldn't win. He promised that he would bow out before the election if his numbers didn't assure victory.

Other Cal GOP leaders were quoted as saying the same.

And yet, McClintock has vowed to stay in the race to the bitter end.

So, the question is ...

Which McClintock do we believe?



TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: arnold; california; davis; governor; mcclintock; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-306 next last
To: AmericaUnited
Another thing on Perot -- he went around the Country being anti-NAFTA while his family was engaged in building Alliance Airport to take NAFTA traffic away from San Antonio. He suckered in folks but good!
141 posted on 10/01/2003 3:40:44 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Support our President -- Donate to Bush-Cheney '04 (www.georgewbush.com/donate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
Is this a "man of his word?"

Of course. Why would you doubt that?


142 posted on 10/01/2003 3:42:53 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
Who wants to be a Republican? I'm a CONSERVATIVE.

I think that is the opinion of a lot of people on FR. Unfortunately, it is these people who so liberally throw around the "RINO" label at everyone who doesn't quite fit their narrow, specialized view of the world. It's ironic -- the ones who castigate people as "Republican In Name Only," often are "Not Even In Name Only."

143 posted on 10/01/2003 3:43:58 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
It is a time of dramatic change and there is great potential in the Republican Rennaisance, brought about by Arniemania, and backed by trust and success.

On the basis of what should Arnold be trusted?

I look forward to re-welcoming the blue collar workers, and dis-empowering unions, and welcoming diversity, and negating false illusions.

Please indulge me and tell me what Arnold plans to do to make these things happen. I especially look forward to your elucidation of what Arnold said to make you think he plans to 'dis-empower unions.'

144 posted on 10/01/2003 3:43:59 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (LEADERS WANTED! No experience, principles nec., will train; Showbiz Stardom a PLUS! Call Calif. GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
Bump for your 108
145 posted on 10/01/2003 3:44:31 PM PDT by djreece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Just out of curiousity, what sort of percentage vote do you think McClintock will get next Tuesday? I'll be up front, and say that he gets 12% (and I'm being generous). Give us your hunch, and we'll see who's closest to the mark.
146 posted on 10/01/2003 3:46:12 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
"Now, here is my plan: audit everything, open the books, and then we end the crazy deficit spending." --Arnold Schwarzenegger

What more do ya need?

147 posted on 10/01/2003 3:47:20 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Aren't you interested in JR's opinion on these issues? I am, particularly since he lives here. Besides, I don't see how quoting him is any different than quoting anyone else who's opinion you value. Maybe it would be different if he was throwing people off who disagree with him on this issue, but he isn't doing that.
148 posted on 10/01/2003 3:48:17 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Issa would also have to fight the notion that he was trying to buy his way into the Governor's mansion -- one that wouldn't be totally inaccurate.


Well 'tock won't have that charge...... unless you count the Indian couple of million.....
149 posted on 10/01/2003 3:50:06 PM PDT by deport (Why does McClintock think he's entitled to the Governor's Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
"I dream of the day when a strong Christian majority is elected to a city council somewhere in America. This council could then pass a resolution declaring that abortion is now illegal in their city," Stoos wrote this year in a conservative religious journal.

McClintock, who employs Stoos as his deputy campaign manager and until recently paid him $93,720 a year as his top legislative analyst, said in an interview last week that he was unaware of Stoos' writings.

"I completely disagree," McClintock said, with Stoos' vision of the anti-abortion city council and "completely reject" the idea that the nation's modern laws should be biblical.

So what's Tom's first act as governor... removing the Ten Commandants from all state property?

150 posted on 10/01/2003 3:50:28 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: projectile
Using polling data is a cheap debating tactic. Does polling data make their opinion more valid?

Nope. Both are logical fallacies - argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority) and argumentum ad populum (appeal to popularity).

151 posted on 10/01/2003 3:50:48 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Not looking forward to "A Day in the Life of Arnold" threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
I'm firmly convinced that if Hillary Clinton switched parties, half of this websites posters would vote for her just to keep a Republican in office.

Hillary is a radical-left-wing democrat. Your post is utterly stupid.

152 posted on 10/01/2003 3:51:01 PM PDT by onyx (Ask the Indian$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Cruz?

That's the bald guy with the same positions as Arnold?

153 posted on 10/01/2003 3:51:47 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
what sort of percentage vote do you think McClintock will get17%.
154 posted on 10/01/2003 3:52:28 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Some of the Left wing Pro Abortion AntiGun Pro Illegal Immigrant RINOS are sooo dismayed that Tom McClintock is still in the race. If 18 percent of the people according to the fraud laden polls, are against killing unborn children, are supporters of the 2nd amendment, are for defending the country against an invasion of illegals, then that is what you should see in the election - 18% for someone who stands for that. Very simple.

God willing another 35% percent who believe the same, will have the small amount of courage and faith necessary to pull the Tomahawk lever and crush the twin supporters of Abortion, Illegal Immigration -Arnold and Bustamonte.
155 posted on 10/01/2003 3:54:03 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'll try typing slowly so you can understand what I'm saying....Prior to the CNN poll out this past Sunday, which shows Arnold pulling away from the pack, the race was close between Arnold and Busty -- 28%-25%, and some polls showing Busty with a three or four point lead. When those polls came out, it was clear that Tom was in the position of spoiler, and it looked like he would end up inadvertantly giving the election to Busty. But Arnold has appeared to have broken from the pack, now leading Busty by 15%. That break out started last week with the Chamber of Commerce poll, and was confirmed by the CNN/Gallup poll released just three days ago. So, my earlier comment that up until the CNN/Gallup poll, McC was a likely spoiler, was true, not assertion.

So, I don't really care how much the McClintock fans fantasize about the position of their man -- he's going to lose, and ironically, won't be much of a factor in the final vote.

156 posted on 10/01/2003 3:54:12 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think Arnold, with all the hype, seudo peaked at the convention. There's a 'strong undercurrent' for Tom and it could likely snowball if compromisers come to their senses.

I say Tom will win, he has more 'quad' coming down the streach.

157 posted on 10/01/2003 3:55:52 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
I was disgusted with McC's appearance on Sean Hannity's show today. Sean even joked that Tom was hosting his show.

No small ego here. It's either McClintock's way or else.

He's NOT a team player.

I'm voting for Arnold.
158 posted on 10/01/2003 3:57:01 PM PDT by ==Oink==
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I do know Ray and Tom and they are both decent Christian men and NOT liars

They directly contradicted each other. They both can't be telling the truth.

Regarding being Christians. One of the main tenants is being a servant to others, i.e. being self-less. Ray and Darryl are behaving that that way, Tom is not. What can be said...

159 posted on 10/01/2003 3:57:13 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; EternalVigilance; Roscoe
The Statist element on the Right is generally more subdued because so many of the GOP base are God fearing and already have their orders from Higher authority. With (R)nold we have a more open type of RINO. He'll be far more comfortable with the strident Left than he will with the GOP base should he gain election.

Thanks for the revealing quote. Bring it up more often -- in the right quarters. ;)

160 posted on 10/01/2003 3:57:46 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson