Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
2 hours, 55 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - U.S. and Indian scientists said Wednesday they have discovered a new carnivorous dinosaur species in India after finding bones in the western part of the country.

Photo
AP Photo


Missed Tech Tuesday?
Check out the powerful new PDA crop, plus the best buys for any budget


The new dinosaur species was named Rajasaurus narmadensis, or "Regal reptile from the Narmada," after the Narmada River region where the bones were found.

The dinosaurs were between 25-30 feet long, had a horn above their skulls, were relatively heavy and walked on two legs, scientists said. They preyed on long-necked herbivorous dinosaurs on the Indian subcontinent during the Cretaceous Period at the end of the dinosaur age, 65 million years ago.

"It's fabulous to be able to see this dinosaur which lived as the age of dinosaurs came to a close," said Paul Sereno, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago. "It was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America."

Working with Indian scientists, Sereno and paleontologist Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan reconstructed the dinosaur skull in a project funded partly by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

A model of the assembled skull was presented Wednesday by the American scientists to their counterparts from Punjab University in northern India and the Geological Survey of India during a Bombay news conference.

Scientists said they hope the discovery will help explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and the shifting of the continents — how India separated from Africa, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica and collided with Asia.

The dinosaur bones were discovered during the past 18 years by Indian scientists Suresh Srivastava of the Geological Survey of India and Ashok Sahni, a paleontologist at Punjab University.

When the bones were examined, "we realized we had a partial skeleton of an undiscovered species," Sereno said.

The scientists said they believe the Rajasaurus roamed the Southern Hemisphere land masses of present-day Madagascar, Africa and South America.

"People don't realize dinosaurs are the only large-bodied animal that lived, evolved and died at a time when all continents were united," Sereno said.

The cause of the dinosaurs' extinction is still debated by scientists. The Rajasaurus discovery may provide crucial clues, Sereno said.

India has seen quite a few paleontological discoveries recently.

In 1997, villagers discovered about 300 fossilized dinosaur eggs in Pisdura, 440 miles northeast of Bombay, that Indian scientists said were laid by four-legged, long-necked vegetarian creatures.

Indian scientists said the dinosaur embryos in the eggs may have suffocated during volcanic eruptions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acanthostega; antarctica; australia; catastrophism; crevolist; dino; dinosaurs; godsgravesglyphs; ichthyostega; india; madagascar; narmadabasin; narmadensis; paleontology; rajasaurus; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: DittoJed2
Give me a freaking break, you are just too funny.

Irreducibly Complex is NOT science, it's a throw your hands in the air and give up.

Irreducibly complex means that the answer is beyond you and it is time for someone with more brainpower to figure it out.

It is nothing but laziness or ignorance, again, take your pick.
1,161 posted on 08/18/2003 8:22:36 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Argument from numbers doesn't work either. Scientists have believed many things about origins even since the time of Darwin. They will believe totally different things in the years to come. Opinions change and scientists tend to adjust dates and the like to what's in vogue at the moment.
1,162 posted on 08/18/2003 8:22:41 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1156 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
The question is what evidence can be presented from either side of the argument. Can creationism predict and then test results? Can evolution?

From everything I have ever read, creationism is a faith-based philosophy. On the other hand, there are many tests and mountains of evidence to support evolution.

A great place to start (even if you don’t buy it at least you will be exposed to the concepts that are being presented) are these two sites:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org

1,163 posted on 08/18/2003 8:25:38 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1158 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Whatever Aric. You just keep believing that.
1,164 posted on 08/18/2003 8:26:11 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Argument from numbers doesn't work either. Scientists have believed many things about origins even since the time of Darwin. They will believe totally different things in the years to come. Opinions change and scientists tend to adjust dates and the like to what's in vogue at the moment.

Not what's in vogue. Theories are revised as new evidence comes to light.

1,165 posted on 08/18/2003 8:28:52 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Degeneration is a result of the fall.

Please state your supporting evidence for this belief.

1,166 posted on 08/18/2003 8:30:08 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1149 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Argument from numbers doesn't work either.

Then lonely little Behe doesn't help you with his credentials or his tiny little handful of ID brothers.

What you're missing about the progress of science is that it is progress. Because your belief system was discredited 140 years ago, you comfort yourself that science simply veers here and there and can be expected to come back to you. But science doesn't simply thrash about. It converges upon an increasingly accurate description of reality.

We used to think fire was a substance called phlogiston that rushes out when a substance burns. Now we think fire is oxidation, a chemical reaction.

Things change in science, but don't bet on phlogiston theory ever coming back. Some things are really wrong.

1,167 posted on 08/18/2003 8:30:08 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Science assumes billions of years. Science assumes evolution. It hypothesizes how this occurred and then looks for the evidence.

Codswallop. In the 19th century, it was believed that the Earth was no more than 30 million years old. The geological evidence that the Earth was several billion years old came as a bolt from the blue. Far from an assumption, the fact of Earth's enormous age obtruded itself in spite of what the theorists believed.

1,168 posted on 08/18/2003 8:34:32 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1154 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
I never questioned YOUR credentials, I told you to go out and get a degree, study it first hand and then come back and tell me what you are now telling me.

In a word, YOU wouldn't be, once you had the education to actually understand the process, you would convince yourself that the columns are indeed true as the theory states.

Personal experience is always the best as far as I am concerned, but then again, I am one of these people that is interested in EVERYTHING. Rocketry, astronomy, geology, paleontology, etc, etc.

I take it upon myself to learn as much as I can from the ACTUAL scientists doing the work.

You are debating a number of them now, and don't even realize it. You are clueless as to whom you are speaking to on this thread, and I find it absolutely hilarious. I will admit, I don't know who or what a few of them are on this thread, but I know that they do KNOW what they are talking about.

If I went to the best university in the US, I would not run across people of this caliber to teach me this stuff

I am humbled by the fact that they are here and I get to learn from them and their experience, and the actual experiments etc that they are doing in the field.

It's fascinating, and I feel lucky to be included within such a group, because I am WAY outclassed by some of the people here, in education, experience etc, yet they teach me, are patient with me, correct me when I am wrong, etc. It has been invaluable to me, that is one of the reasons I am here.

To learn as much as I can from these people.

Again, I find it hilarious that you attempt to debate them, but I sure do learn a lot.

I guess there is a reason for everything.
1,169 posted on 08/18/2003 8:35:37 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1158 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
If I may put my two cents worth in here. Perhaps we could use this thread as a starting point of evidence for degeneration.
1,170 posted on 08/18/2003 8:35:48 PM PDT by goodseedhomeschool (returned) (If history has shown us anything, labeling ignorance science, proves scripture correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
...that is variation within a kind...

Are horses, donkeys, zebras, etc. the same or different 'kinds'?

Conventionally, they're considered different species in the same genus.

1,171 posted on 08/18/2003 8:37:21 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Behe is a scientist who has spent much time studying the complexity of the universe. Evolution can't explain what Behe witnessed.

As has been pointed out to many creationists here already, Behe does NOT disagree with most of the theory of evolution.

"Intelligent Design is NOT Creationism" - M.J.Behe

1,172 posted on 08/18/2003 8:38:27 PM PDT by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1159 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
From one of your links (Constraints on extra time dimensions):

We discuss phenomenology of extra time dimensions in a scenario where the standard model particles are localized in \our" time, whereas gravity can propagate in all time dimensions. For an odd number of extra times, at small distances, the (real part of the) Newtonian potential is \screened" by tachyonic Kaluza-Klein gravitons. In general, the gravitational self-energy of objects acquires an imaginary part. This complexity may either be interpreted as an amplitude for the disappearance into \nothing", leading to the causality and probability violation in low-energy processes, or as an artifact of the ctitious decay into the unphysical negative energy tachyons.
Never mind how you fit it in, I just want to know how you can read that stuff! "Tachyonic Kaluza-Klein gravitons!" Then, if you can wade through the English, there's the math!

I'll wait for the layman's version. ;)

1,173 posted on 08/18/2003 8:43:02 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1143 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
The years are proposed periods of times. They were proposed by men who are fallible. Dating methods do not confirm them and circular reasoning is often used (we date the layers by the fossils and the fossils by the layers). It is hypothesis.
1,174 posted on 08/18/2003 8:44:24 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1168 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC; RightWingNilla; StolarStorm
Essentially StolarStorm said that creationism was not science and a waste of time...Now you actively seek the creationist viewpoint on this thread. Those are contradictory viewpoints.

What he actually said was

It would be nice if the creationists would simply stop trying to 'witness' on the science threads

Which I interpreted as asking for scientific evidence, as opposed to Scriptural interpretations. The precise meaning of Genesis is not a scientific question, it's a theological one, and doesn't belong in a discussion of science.

1,175 posted on 08/18/2003 8:45:28 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
Horses donkeys and zebras probably had a common ancestor.
1,176 posted on 08/18/2003 8:48:03 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: RightWingNilla
And I don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Behe has many arguments that show a designed earth. Not evolution by chance. That is what he and his cohorts are trying to prove. That this earth did not randomly evolve by chance. I never claimed he was a young earth creationist. He is probably a theistic evolutionist that believes God created something, that he designed things the way they are meant to be.
1,177 posted on 08/18/2003 8:50:43 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Never mind how you fit it in, I just want to know how you can read that stuff!

LOLOL! It is a bit bumpy to read, but it is great fun - well, for me.

A little tidbit though, the Kaluza-Klein theories are the basis for superstring theory and the reason why people speak of the extra dimensions being all rolled up into tiny vibrating strings. Actually it is not necessary to visualize an extra time dimension as compactified.

1,178 posted on 08/18/2003 8:52:35 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
You're right. You assumed my credentials rather than question them. I've never stated my credentials. I am educated though, and I can read, and I can reason. You have been condescending much of the time, including to others such as Behe. Doesn't help your cause much at all, in spite of the "experts" on the thread whom you are humbled to be in the presence of.
1,179 posted on 08/18/2003 8:53:21 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Why do you even bother with these folk. These are the same people who believe that the lunar landing was fake, and a set up. Debating with these loons only empowers them. They are funny, no debating that. But, if you step back and see read this thread a couple of weeks from now - it will scare the life out of you.
1,180 posted on 08/18/2003 8:53:54 PM PDT by USMMA_83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,200 ... 3,121-3,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson