Skip to comments.
CA Governor Davis to hold news conference at 6:30 pm easten
MSNBC
Posted on 08/07/2003 1:50:46 PM PDT by Dog
Breaking!
TOPICS: Breaking News; US: California
KEYWORDS: arewethereyet; breakingwind; calgov2002; cheeserecall; francoisstilldead; gumbygumbygumbygumby; hllisverysorry; howmuchlonger; iamsorry; ihaveemergencypowers; imgumbydarnit; iwasverywrong; iwaswrong; jacksonbrown; joejoejoejoejoejoe; late; leavehilalone; midnighteastern; moosechedder; mooseisrunning; princealbertinacan; refrigeratorrunning; runfortheroses; runningman; runningonempty; sinceremistake; ticktockticktock; tomorrow; waitingforgodot; waitingwaitingwaitn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 1,081-1,085 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf
Some people on here are lying or inferring things about Arnold that are not true! Wouldn't believe anything some of these people are saying about Arnold! Asked for sources -- there are none!
361
posted on
08/07/2003 3:23:51 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: Fitzcarraldo
It depends. The laws which specify who can run in a general election are probably crafted with the term limits in mind. They would probably prevent someone who has served two terms from getting on the ballot. But the recall ballot laws were crafted at a different time-- do they specify anything that would restrict him as a two termer?
And if the only thing is a description for the Governorship which says that a person may serve only two terms, would not the CSC be who would decide what two terms is (even if the language is plain--see the decisions and precedents set by the SCOFLA).
362
posted on
08/07/2003 3:24:01 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(Play Presidential Survivor-- Clinton could be gone this week: http://williammckinley.blogspot.com)
To: Henchster
Gray Davis: "I have important news for the people of California. I just saved a bunch of money on my auto insurance!"
("Of course, the savings will be more than wiped out by my auto registration fee hike.")
To: Ed_in_NJ
I'm checking out...will listen on the am dial!
364
posted on
08/07/2003 3:24:18 PM PDT
by
Feiny
(Life is too short to drink bad wine.)
To: Pravious
I think what Rush was doing in is comments about Arnold was setting the listeners straight on who and what Arnold is. There is clearly a misconception among many that Arnold is a republican, thus he is a conservative. He is neither. I didn't hear Rush in any way, shape, or form tell his listeners to not vote for Arnold.
365
posted on
08/07/2003 3:24:48 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: feinswinesuksass
DAVIS SPEAKING NOW ON FOX
To: Dog
Here he is - on Hume -
all of the things we need to do to improve financial structure reform...his agenda
MORON
To: Henchster
LOL. Is that an example of Rush Gekko Syndrome?
To: BeforeISleep
Is this the News Conference?
369
posted on
08/07/2003 3:25:14 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: BlessedByLiberty
"I am the governor." ,
DOLT
370
posted on
08/07/2003 3:25:38 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Comment #371 Removed by Moderator
To: Tree of Liberty
No resignation that I heard. He is such a weanie.
Comment #373 Removed by Moderator
To: Phantom Lord
didn't say anything about resigning. Talked about his agenda for the next 60 days.
To: Hildy
That's it???
375
posted on
08/07/2003 3:25:53 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: Diddle E. Squat
Ah yes, Fox News Channel, right on top of breaking news...
To: steveegg
I think the momentum effect will introduce Californians to all manner of Republican back-office types that will also help with the heavy lifting for Arnold.
He is a dynamic, mobilizing whirlwind who is faced with a fading, punishing business climate.
He will stimulate the California economy, and lowering taxes is the right start.
He will be perfect - the right man for the time.
There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.
To: Henchster
LOL!
378
posted on
08/07/2003 3:26:17 PM PDT
by
steveo
(Hey mom... where do taglines come from?)
To: VU4G10
I wish McClintock would quit vowing to void the electricity contracts. For one thing, he can't do it. It's not in his power.
And secondly, there are no valid legal grounds to do it. Without that, contracts are binding, even if you don't like them later.
To: BlessedByLiberty
You may be right and he could be successful on the federal level. That's how Prop 187 was derailed.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 1,081-1,085 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson