Skip to comments.
FOX NEWS: Rev. Gene Robinson Confirmed As Episcopal Church Bishop
Fox News Live
Posted on 08/05/2003 5:07:32 PM PDT by Brian S
Rev. Gene Robinson Confirmed As Episcopal Church Bishop
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 62to45vote; 62votes; anglican; bishop; bungholebuddies; buttholesurfers; buttpirate; christianlist; confirmed; episcopal; fallout; gay; generalconvention; generobinson; gerbilinserters; herecomedajudge; hijackedbygaybishop; hivpositiveperverts; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lawsuitsdotcom; penniesfromheaven; queer; sodomgommorah; sodomites; trialbyvictims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 501-504 next last
Comment #281 Removed by Moderator
To: twinmag
Matt.24
[34] Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
Rom.13
[8] Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
[10] Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Nothing is changed. The law, prophets and promises have been fulfilled.
282
posted on
08/05/2003 7:35:25 PM PDT
by
PFKEY
To: twinmag
Are they the same?Errr, no.
283
posted on
08/05/2003 7:35:32 PM PDT
by
Charles H. (The_r0nin)
(The NEW Episcopal Church motto: The Bible is more of a guideline than a hard-and-fast rule...)
To: Salvation
So far, the Catholic Church is the one and only church standing against this gay issue. You have a provincial world-view. There are dozens of Protestant denominations that are "standing against this gay issue." But then, they aren't the "one and only church" are they?
To: twinmag
Been lurking a long time. Just logged from my son's computer. Maybe the Episcopalians read these passages in the Bible: Leviticus 11:10: And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind, it is abomination. Note the use of the same description "abomination." Ergo Homosexuality according to the Bible is no worse than eating a shrimp cocktail or a catfish platter. Where am I wrong?
Your error is a common one that many people make. It is the difference between the ceremonial and dietary law that God handed down to Israel only and the eternal moral law that God handed down for all people. The prohibition against eating certain foods and engaging in some acts that would make one unclean were part of the cermonial/dietary laws.
However, the prohibition against homosexual behavior is part of the moral law. It applies not just to Israel but to all peoples and are for all time.
Your misinterpretation is common among people who want to take verses out of context to attempt to impune the Bible. Also, it's a lie that the Bible only condemns homosexuality in the Old Testament. See Romans 1.
To: JohnKeble
There is a viable option for all orthodox Anglicans who want to maintain the historic worship, doctrine, and discipline of the Anglican tradition - and that is the Reformed Episcopal Church. They have 100% orthodox and conservative bishops and accept the Bible as their ultimate authority, as well as affirming the Creeds, the first four ecumenical councils, and the Thirty-Nine Articles. Anyone who is looking for an orthodox Anglican home in the U.S. should check them out. Another alternative is the Pastoral Provision for the Anglican Usage of the Roman Rite. These are Catholic parishes comprised of former Anglican and Episcopalian congregations that have become Roman Catholic, and which have been given special permission to celebrate their own uniquely English version of the orthodox Catholic mass. Our parishes tend to be orthodox, doctrinally conservative, and liturgically traditional; the mass is celebrated by a properly attired priest, who faces the Tabernacle (not the congregation) and offers us the Body and Blood of the Lord from his own hands. (We receive Communion on the tongue while kneeling at the altar rail.) Our mass is based upon the traditional Anglican forms as found in The Book of Divine Worship and do not contain recent liturgical improvements. Yes, we have married priests, but these men were married before joining the Catholic Church, and are fully orthodox in their belief and teaching regarding priestly celibacy.
Anglicans, come home. The Roman Catholic Church needs you. There has never been a better time to cross the Tiber than now.
286
posted on
08/05/2003 7:36:58 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: Coleus
How many divorced, remarried Catholics do you know who take communion? How many who have been able to get their first marriage anulled despite having raised children together? Confession is a sacrament in the Episcopal church as well. My understanding is that there were 2 Popes at one time, on in England and one in Rome. The Pope in Rome wanted the English one to come back to Rome but apparently he had Henry the Eighth's ear.
To: tinamina
How many divorced, remarried Catholics do you know who take communion? How many who have been able to get their first marriage anulled despite having raised children together?I suspect in time that the Catholic church will ordain woman and homosexuals as well.
A little leaven.
288
posted on
08/05/2003 7:40:47 PM PDT
by
PFKEY
To: tinamina
The only time there were "two popes" was during the Avignon Crisis. During that time there were "two popes" though one was an anti-pope, elected by his allies who didn't like the result of the papal conclave and instead chose to elect a candidate of their own choosing. There was one English pope to my knowledge, Hadrian IV, but he was in the early middle ages.
As to the period of Henry VIII, you might be refering to Cardinal Wolsey, not a Pope, but someone who held the King's ear. The one Pope was Clement XII (I think).
To: NWU Army ROTC
when I say one Pope, I mean the Pope at the time of the reign of Henry VIII, so that period in history.
To: twinmag
"Finally, the dietary restrictions for the Jews are done away with in the New Testament, but the prohibitions against homosexuality are repeated and confirmed for ALL people."
So the exact chapter and verse would be....?
If the Bible is the absolute word of God, how can it change?
Well in this specific example, Christ fulfilled the requirements of the Old Testament ans broke down the wall dividing Jew from Gentile.
Here are some of the scriptures;
For starters we read in Romans 10:12 " there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him."
Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
We see that circumcision is not necessary for salvation (Cor. 2:2, 7:18,19)..That dietary statutes are no longer in effect (Acts 10 )...that there is no longer need for sacrifices (Hebrew 9:12)....
291
posted on
08/05/2003 7:42:20 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Diddle E. Squat
The Bible is toilet paper to the Episcopalians
To: pyx
The homosexual activists could have formed their own church...
Yes but you see, the idea is that if they can change the Bible (Jesus never spoke of homosexuality you know) and take over the church, they will be able to sell their lifestyle more easily AND think that God approves of their sin, therefore their shame is gone without repentance.
To: Jorge
They probably did see it coming. But I guess it's like a train wreck - you can't stop it, but you still hope at the last minute that something will intervene and prevent it from happening. But nothing did, in this case.
294
posted on
08/05/2003 7:43:50 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Fifth Business
Your attempt at sarcasm has failed. First, the Roman Catholic Church is not a denomination. Second, I'll wager that there isn't a single Protestant denomination that isn't infested by sodomites -- or adulterers, or other kinds of sexually perverted people. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that there are more than a few Sodomites infesting
your church. Let the denomination without sin cast the first stone!
There's no future in being a Pharisee, Fifth Business. Why don't you try a little Christian charity every once in a while? It tastes better than bile -- and it could save your soul as well as your stomach lining.
Yours in Christian fraternity,
295
posted on
08/05/2003 7:43:51 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: technomage
Here is how he rationalizes this. I will paraphrase from memory: At the time the Bible was written, lifestyles and civilization were different.
At the time the bible was written, a man's anus was for poopin' and it still is now.
To: xrp
I wonder how they feel now that the entire country will refer to them as the "Gay Church"
297
posted on
08/05/2003 7:45:22 PM PDT
by
max_rpf
To: Coleus
Oh, I forgot that Episcopalian churches allow ALL baptized Christinas to receive communion, while the Roman Church excludes anyone who cannot prove their baptism in the Roman Church from taking communion.
To: George W. Bush
But will the Primates recognize the objection and allow a split, thereby creating two Episcopal churches in America? Primates; n : an animal order including lemurs and tarsiers and monkeys and apes and human beings
Interesting question. Which one would you expect the tarsiers to go with?
299
posted on
08/05/2003 7:46:24 PM PDT
by
Barnacle
(A Human Shield against the onslaught of Leftist tripe.)
To: B-Chan
There's no future in being a Pharisee, Fifth Business. Why don't you try a little Christian charity every once in a while? It tastes better than bile -- and it could save your soul as well as your stomach lining. Sorry. I was not trying to be bilious. Your opportunism is offensive to me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 501-504 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson