Let BRAVO Know What You THINK About Their Homosexual Agenda!

07/29/03 | Kieri

[Kieri]

This morning I decided to let BRAVO have an earful. Here is my email:

"As a DirecTV subscriber, I am notifying you I am permanently blocking BRAVO from my menu on my DSS receiver.

Your push for homosexual-'friendly' programming demonstrates your pandering to an audience that exhibits behavior that is not only detrimental to their own health, but the health and safety of families everywhere. I refuse to risk allowing my children to see promo material on your channel, so I find it necessary to block BRAVO and will encourage others to do so. Your advertisers will no longer reach me or my family members, and I have let DirecTV know of our all too easy decision to block BRAVO.

You may consider a homosexual audience on worthy of pursuit, but families who treasure their own lifestyles think otherwise."

I encourage others to let both BRAVO and their cable/DSS companies know that you're blocking their agenda-pushing programming!

BRAVO's "Contact Us" page is here:

http://www.bravotv.com/Contact_Us/

OR you can smail mail them here:

Bravo Viewer Relations
c/o NBC Entertainment
3000 W. Alameda Ave.
Burbank, CA 90036

[MineralMan]

"Don't forget, most of us Scots-Irish have a few Eric-the Red-snakes in the woodpile.
"

Oh, I have no doubt of that. My brother had flaming red hair, and both of my parents are Scots-Irish. There's a Norwegian in there somewhere.

[finnman69]

And the only way they can do this is by perpetuating the homosexual stereotype? Wouldn't the format of the show be as successful or even more so using top experts in each field whether they were homosexual or straight?

They could follow the same format as other shows or do what they did, create a unique program. Whicg do you think will get better ratings? Lets see how the ratings do. Judging by the fact that this thread is up to 400 posts, I bet the ratings will be great.

FYI, there are several other shows that have makeovers with fashion experts and professional interior decorators, however I am unfamiliar with any show that attempts a full on culture, cooking, decorating, styling, fashion makeover. And no others were its led by an all gay cast. If they get great ratings I guarantee there will be more shows of this type.

[george wythe]

Is cunnilingus a sin?

Do lesbians get AIDS at a higher proportion that heterosexual couples?

[Scourge of God]

Of course you have that right, within the bounds of the Constitution. You can't, however, pass laws that limit the freedom of speech of others, without very, very good cause. A makeover show where gay guys fix up a straight guy's style just doesn't fit that cause. Just remember, unless everyone has freedom of speech, nobody does. That's a fact.

Amen to everything you said, with one exception. I'll define my own causes, thank you. If I think the Westminster Dog Show is a tool of satan, I'll do everything I can, within the limits of the constitution, to get it off TV.

[MineralMan]

". I thought Bravo was going to be a station dedicated to the interests of men. Real men.

"

Uh, that was TNN, not Bravo. And what are they showing on TNN, the channel for men? Stripperella? Silliness. Bravo is a channel that was traditionally dedicated to the arts. It has changed now, but still shows some of the best films ever made. This Queer Eye for the Straight Guy thing is just a silly semi-reality show. It won't hurt you, but you don't have to watch it. I don't.

[Scourge of God]

Is cunnilingus a sin?

Nope.

Do lesbians get AIDS at a higher proportion that heterosexual couples?

I don't know.

[Xenalyte]

Lord, I hope not. ;)

[Grampa Dave]

How about SAP!

Sexually Addicted Pervert!

[george wythe]

You post a lot of inflammatory rhetoric and you don't even know whether lesbians get AIDS at a higher proportion than the rest of the population.

Why are you so consumed with male homosexuality while ignoring female homosexuality?

Could it be that your arguments against female homosexuality are very weak?

[finnman69]

Why are you so consumed with male homosexuality while ignoring female homosexuality?

Because most guys with healthy sex drives don't mind watching lesbian porn.

[Scourge of God]

You post a lot of inflammatory rhetoric and you don't even know whether lesbians get AIDS at a higher proportion than the rest of the population. Why are you so consumed with male homosexuality while ignoring female homosexuality? Could it be that your arguments against female homosexuality are very weak?

Well, females rarely rupture each other's rectum lining through penetration, and thus probably don't pass the bug as easily. Overall, the same arguments apply, I should think.

[MineralMan]

"Amen to everything you said, with one exception. I'll define my own causes, thank you. If I think the Westminster Dog Show is a tool of satan, I'll do everything I can, within the limits of the constitution, to get it off TV."

Fine with me, as long as you stay within the limits of the Constitution. You're welcome to speak your mind as much as you want. Others are welcome to accept or ignore your speech. So it goes.

[MineralMan]

"Why are you so consumed with male homosexuality while ignoring female homosexuality?"

I think it's because all manly men like to watch two women together. If it were not so, just about every porn film ever made wouldn't have two women together. It's only male homosexuality that gets folks going, it seems.

Even the Bible doesn't have much to say about women fooling with each other, save one verse written by Paul. Maybe they liked watching that stuff back then, too.

Now, I can't imagine having any sort of sexual encounter with another man. It would just never happen. It ain't my thing at all. I wonder if that feeling is as strong in most women about sexual encounters between two women. From my conversations with my wife and other women I've known, I don't think so.

[jellybean]

FYI, there are several other shows that have makeovers with fashion experts and professional interior decorators, however I am unfamiliar with any show that attempts a full on culture, cooking, decorating, styling, fashion makeover. And no others were its led by an all gay cast. If they get great ratings I guarantee there will be more shows of this type.

I love to watch makeovers and would enjoy watching a complete all-around makeover, but it seems to me the use of an all homosexual cast is for shock value and to promote the idea that the homosexual lifestyle is glamorous. If it were just about doing complete makeovers, they would use top experts in their fields and not be concerned about whether they were straight or gay.

It's been fun, but I must go to work now. Later...

[Scourge of God]

I think it's because all manly men like to watch two women together. If it were not so, just about every porn film ever made wouldn't have two women together.

---

It's a beauty thing, I guess. Beautiful woman are worth watching, whether on DVD or sitting in a park and enjoying the scenery.

[george wythe]

We pay in higher medical premiums, in money diverted from cancer or other disease research to focus on AIDS, in increasing medical costs in genera

Are you sure lesbians fit this profile you posted on #399?

Your argument against female homosexuality seems vacuous at best.

[CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC]

I think that the homosexual cabal planning on converting everybody theory is ludicrous.

Glad to see we agree on something! Yes, the theory concerning the plan of "converting everybody" is certainly ludicrous. Just like the theory that "media bias will convert everybody to be liberals" is ludicrous. Just like the theory that "every professor in America is a Communist or Marxist" is ludicrous.

But what's the most ludicrous thing of all is that .... prepare yourself for a shock ...... absolutely NOBODY believes any of these theories! Nobody except the straw men invented by the Liberals and the Libertarians, that is.

What really happens is this --- conservatives argue that pro-homosexual propaganda really does influence young people who are discovering sexual feelings for the first time and are confused about what they are experiencing - and it can help to tip the balance in many cases (but certainly not in ALL cases, and probably not even in MOST). And they point out that this same propaganda causes many people of all ages to be more accepting of gay initiatives (but certainly not ALL people). And likewise, conservatives point out that large numbers of professors are Marxists (but not ALL of them), and that many (but not ALL) people really are swayed by media bias to vote Democrat.

And in response, Liberals come out with the same type of straw man arguments that you do. Instead of debating the facts brought up by conservatives, they misquote arguments they know they can't answer in order to morph them into something that looks ridiculous. Then they claim that THESE are the real positions of their opponents. So for instance, the "many people are converted" argument morphs into "ALL people are converted" because of course it's always easier to debate a straw dog you created yourself than it is to debate what your opponents are actually saying.

[finnman69]

but it seems to me the use of an all homosexual cast is for shock value and to promote the idea that the homosexual lifestyle is glamorous.

I just dont see the promotion. Unless they are trying to promote that its glamorouse to be a little swishy. Youa re correct about the use of a homosexual cast as shock value. Shock value designed to boost ratings and make money.

[CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC]

.....pedophiles in the gay community are fewer in absolute and relative numbers compared to the pedophiles in the straight community....

Right about absolute numbers. Wrong about relative numbers. Dangerously wrong, I might add. (See my post #362)

[dogbyte12]

You could use your argument to prohibit anything though couldn't you.

Now of course not all drinkers are alcoholics, but alcoholism kills people, and people who are alcohol drinkers offer others drinks, hoping to convert them. Let's ban alcohol.

Now not all people who eat fast food get overweight and get heart disease, but enough do. Heck, they invite their friends there, and convert them to that unhealthy lifestyle. Let's put a kabosh on that.

My point is that these arguments are considered ludicrous on their face. Alcoholics driving kill alot of people. The same people up in arms about this show, tend not to be the people who want to ban alcohol or fast food, or cigarettes for that matter.

Joe Camel was trying to recruit kids into smoking. Why not ban Camel cigarettes?