Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

Damn, I hate it when I've been had and I've been had big time.

In 1982, while I was working for Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico, a man came up to a me during a gathering in Albuquerque and introduced himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson. He said he was a security consultant and gave me a business card with his name and just a Los Angeles phone number.

A few weeks later, he called my Washington office and asked to meet for lunch. He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted "security profiles" for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs. Lujan served on the committee with oversight on both labs and he offered his services if we ever needed briefings.

We already had nuclear experts on the committee, on loan from the Department of Energy, and we never used Wilkinson for briefings but we kept in touch over the years. He said he had served in Vietnam with Army Special Force, worked for Air America, later for the FBI and as a consultant for the CIA. He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson.

"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me. When I left politics and returned to journalism, Wilkinson became a willing, but always unnamed, source.

Over the last couple of years, Wilkinson served as either a primary or secondary source on a number of stories that have appeared in Capitol Hill Blue regarding intelligence activities. In early stories, I collaborated his information with at least one more source. His information usually proved accurate and, over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup.

On Tuesday, we ran a story headlined "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes." For the first time, Wilkinsson said he was willing to go on the record and told a story about being present, as a CIA contract consultant, at two briefings with Bush. He said he was retired now and was fed up and wanted to go public.

"He (Bush) said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said in our story. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result.

Then a friend from the Hill called.

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Both of his phone numbers have Los Angeles area codes but an identity check through Know-X today revealed no record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever having lived in LA or surrounding communities.

His email address turns out to be a blind forward to a free email service where anyone can sign up and get an email account. Because it was not one of the usual "free" services like Hotmail, Yahoo or such, I did not recognize it as one (although you'd think that someone like me would have known better).

The bottom line is that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme. I've spent the last two hours going through the database of Capitol Hill Blue stories and removing any that were based on information from Wilkinson (or whoever he is). I've also removed his name, quotes and claims from Tuesday's story about the White House and the uranium claims.

Erasing the stories doesn't erase the fact that we ran articles containing informattion that, given the source, were most likely inaccurate. And it doesn't erase the sad fact that my own arrogance allowed me to be conned.

It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name.

Any news publication exists on the trust of its readers. Because I depended on a source that was not credible, I violated the trust that the readers of Capitol Hill Blue placed in me.

I was wrong. I am sorry.

© Copyright 2003 by Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 200307; 20030709; 20yearsofsuckerhood; admiralboorda; afoolandhissources; andstillnonames; apology; batboy; beatitdoug; bush; capitalhillblue; capitolhillbs; ccrm; chb; chrissteele; chump; cia; corn; correction; corrrection; coupplots; davidcorn; debkaneedsdoug; dougthompson; fraud; gocheckcaponesvault; hoax; inaccuracies; iraq; itsalongroadbackdoug; keywordsgohere; laughingstock; leavefrdoug; lies; longwalkshortpier; losalamos; loseyourdayjob; lostcredibility; makesthenytlookgood; marcash; markash; meaculpa; media; mediabias; nosoupforyou; notreadyforprimetime; rankamateurmistake; retraction; ruinedpermanently; salonishiring; sandia; sandianationallab; scoop; steeledossier; suuuuuucker; terrancejwilkinson; terrancewilkinson; thescoopthatwasnt; tookthedougforawalk; truthout; uranium; whosthefraud; wilkerson; wilkinson; wilkinsonsbitch; wmd; yourestilllyingdoug; youvebeenowneddoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: cyncooper
Thanks you cyncooper! That post makes my day. Woodward has spoken and that he has so much respect for President Bush (as we all do) really says a lot to me, especially because he went into enemy territory to say it. Hillary will be sticking pins in his likeness.
1,101 posted on 07/10/2003 8:45:52 PM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Greg Thielmann, former CIA/State Department, thought the WMD evidence was "distorted" ...

Google, Greg Thielmann, 3rd article ... (am I banned for lack of link? ... please, no ...)

1,102 posted on 07/10/2003 8:46:57 PM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Bump. Thanks for the flag
1,103 posted on 07/10/2003 9:51:26 PM PDT by Valin (America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Doug is not believable.......

I agree. The quick apology tells me "Damn, I got caught"....

He almost sounds like Hillary "He lied to me and I believed him". I was hurt and angry. Doug is a martyr, too???

"BE WISE"

1,104 posted on 07/10/2003 9:57:52 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1091 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
Yep, that was written long after Doug's other hissy fit and bogus apology. Doug is a weasel, who should be banned from FR and his articles, if posted at all, placed in our HUMOR section.
1,105 posted on 07/10/2003 9:59:09 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Don't " cheer " old Doug on. He's a liar and this so called " apology " is just Doug attempting to throw everyone off the scent and is a CYA manuever. His supposed " source ", most probably, is a figment of his imagination and nothing more.
1,106 posted on 07/10/2003 10:01:42 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1010 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Know what I like about you, nopardons?

You join a thread in the evening hours, sometimes even really late... and start reading and posting responses to everyone. Your posts all get attached to the end, quite often, and read off as a laundry list of all of the fallacies and illogical statements made at the beginning of the thread.

This is very interesting, since I generally read the vast majority of the thread from the end to the beginning! So, I get a preview of the ignorance that is sitting at the top of the thread! Ha!

Keep up the good work!
1,107 posted on 07/10/2003 10:04:45 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies]

To: Imal
BRAVO ! You get it ... you really, really, REALLY get it. :-)
1,108 posted on 07/10/2003 10:05:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I just finished Woodward's "Bush at War" and was pleasantly surprised at how fair he was to the president. Heck, it was so positive a portrayal of Bush that it could have been written by Karen Hughes. Woodward's respect for Bush is obvious throughout. It's a worthy read. (Although, the book is somewhat marred by it's glowing portrait of Powell juxtaposed with lots of digs at Cheney and Rumsfeld.)
1,109 posted on 07/10/2003 10:11:22 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Came upon this thread late in the game, but have followed links to find out the background of all of this, and I must say I am impressed with this confession you have written. Thanks very much for telling us the truth, and I wonder how many other journalists are being duped. The other side will stop at nothing.
1,110 posted on 07/10/2003 10:16:46 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Read #1020
1,111 posted on 07/10/2003 10:19:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
BLUSH

Thank you. They also serves, who come to FR late.Pardon the change to that well worn phrase...just my sense of late night humor. :-)

I used to be on FR for hours and hours and hours. I now lead a more " normal " life, but come to FR to keep up/keep my hand in. I read EVERYTHING i can and do my " comments"/responese. They also help to bump the threads. LOL

Errors, misstated " facts ", and sheer lunacy drives me crazy. So ... I correct them.

1,112 posted on 07/10/2003 10:21:46 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
No, no, no, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Go read all about his first damned smearing, falsehoods, left handed and whinging apology. Doug should NOT be praised; he's done NOTHING, nothing whatsoever (!), to deserve any. He's a Bushbasher par excellence,a liar, a writer of fiction, and a slanderer. Truth ? He wouldn't know what's true, if it bit him on his nose, whislt flailing away, with red hot hammers about his head. Your misplaced fervor is , well, simply MISPLACED, old friend.

1,113 posted on 07/10/2003 10:26:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
boring..it's yesterdays news..

1,114 posted on 07/10/2003 10:27:21 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hint! Hint!Hint! Hint!Hint! Hint!Hint! Hint!Hint! Hint!Hint! Hint!

1,115 posted on 07/10/2003 10:28:26 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a monthly donor to Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1114 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
It's yesterdays meatloaf, get on with your life

1,116 posted on 07/10/2003 10:28:28 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
My hat is off to you, sir.
1,117 posted on 07/10/2003 10:39:30 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Larry King had Bob Woodward on tonight and he obviously respects President Bush very much. He said the president is an honest man and would not lie or deceive.

One last note, Woodward said the speech President Bush gave at Goree Island was one of his best speeches and that President Bush meant every word.

God Bless America and God Bless our President Bush.

My opinion of Bob Woodward has turned 180 degrees from what it was before (remembering the interveiws with a dying Bill Casey which no one could vet). Thanks for this piece of information.

1,118 posted on 07/10/2003 10:48:17 PM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Why ? Because he lies? Because he flails about to come up with some pathetic exuse or other, when caught in fabrications and slaner ? Or, is it because he's such an exemplar of high minded journalism, that he's used ( if the man even exists,. which many of us doubt ! )a source, for twenty, T-W-E-N-T-Y , years without even checking to see if the phone numbers, not to ment the person himself, were valid, legit, or for real.

Look into Doug's history. This is NOT the first such cause celebre he's pulled off.

1,119 posted on 07/10/2003 10:49:23 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I need to leave to run some errands that can't be put off. I will be thinking while gone and perhaps some other avenues of investigation will occur to me

Every anti-Bush fraud or other mischeif perpetrated on the 'Net, IMO, starts and ends with THESE GUYS

Do you remember when we discovered many of the seemingly distinct "Impeach Bush" and other anti-GOP websites that sprung from the "grassroots" during the Florida recount were registered by David Lytel? Several of the "They stole the election" sites were registered PRIOR to the Florida debacle unfolding.

Lytel is at the bottom of most Web shenanigans, I am confident, and I sure hope it wasn't one of Lytel's shell companies that bought CHB.

1,120 posted on 07/10/2003 11:06:41 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,321-1,340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson