Posted on 06/13/2003 12:26:29 PM PDT by pabianice
"We have legal custody of the children and we will do with them as we see fit," DSS worker Susan Etscovitz told the Bryants in their Gale Street home. "They are minors and they do what we tell them to do!"
WALTHAM, MA -- A legal battle over two home-schooled children exploded into a seven-hour standoff yesterday, when they refused to take a standardized test ordered by the Department of Social Services.
George Nicholas Bryant, 15, and Nyssa Bryant, 13, stood behind their parents, Kim and George, as police and DSS workers attempted to collect the children at 7:45 a.m. DSS demanded that the two complete a test to determine their educational level.
After a court order was issued by Framingham Juvenile Court around 1 p.m., the children were driven by their parents to a Waltham hotel.
Again, they refused to take the test.
"The court order said that the children must be here. It said nothing about taking the test," said George Bryant.
The second refusal came after an emotion-filled morning for the family, when DSS workers sternly demanded the Bryants comply with their orders.
"We have legal custody of the children and we will do with them as we see fit," DSS worker Susan Etscovitz told the Bryants in their Gale Street home. "They are minors and they do what we tell them to do."
Four police officers were also at the scene and attempted to coax the Bryants to listen to the DSS worker.
"We are simply here to prevent a breach of the peace," said Waltham Youth Officer Detective James Auld. "We will will not physically remove the children."
Yesterday's events are the continuation of a six-year legal battle between the family and Waltham Public Schools and the state.
The Bryants contend that the city and state do not have the legal right to force their children to take standardized tests, even though DSS workers have threatened to take their children from them.
"There have been threats all along. Most families fall to that bullying by the state and the legal system," said George Bryant.
"But this has been a six-year battle between the Waltham Public Schools and our family over who is in control of the education of our children," Bryant continued. "In the end the law of this state will protect us."
The Bryant children have never attended public school.
Both sides agree that the children are in no way abused mentally, physically, sexually or emotionally, but legal custody of the children was taken from Kim and George Bryant in December 2001. The children will remain under the legal custody of DSS until their 16th birthdays.
The parents have been ruled as unfit because they did not file educational plans or determine a grading system for the children, two criteria of Waltham Public School's home schooling policy.
"We do not believe in assessing our children based on a number or letter. Their education process is their personal intellectual property," said Bryant.
George Bryant said he was arrested six years ago, after not attending a meeting that the city contends he was summoned to. The meeting was called by the Waltham School Department for his failure to send his children to school.
"We want these issues aired in the open, in public. The school system and DSS have fought to keep this behind closed doors," said Bryant.
Superintendent of Schools Susan Parrella said she was unaware of yesterday's incident and that, currently the school department approves of the education plan filed by DSS for the Bryant children.
"An acceptable home school plan is in place right now," said Parrella. "I was not aware of any testing occurring today."
The Bryant children freely admit that they have no intention of taking a test.
"We don't want to take the test. We have taken them before and I don't think they are a fair assessment of what we know," said Nyssa Bryant. "And no one from DSS has ever asked us what we think."
Kenneth Pontes, area director of DSS, denied that workers have never talked to the children privately, but admitted that this type of case isn't often seen by his office.
"This is an unusual case. Different school systems require different regulations for home-schooled children. Waltham requires testing," said Pontes.
Pontes said that a possibility exists that the children will be removed from their home, but that was a last course of action.
"No one wants these children to be put in foster homes. The best course of action would for (the Bryants) to instruct the children to take the test," said Etscovitz.
The Bryant family is due in Framingham District Court this morning, to go before a juvenile court judge. According to DSS, this session will determine what their next course of action will be and if the children will be removed from the Bryants' home.
"These are our children and they have and always will be willing participants in their education," said Kim Bryant.
Tax Relief brought up a third front in this war and that is open court records. ALMA, the AAC, WARM and BN have all been fighting the open record battle in the adoption arena for at least twenty years that I know of.
There are plenty of battles to be fought.
LS
Not only that but if you have a case they think they can win it doesn't matter if you are a member or not. This happened in Michigan. After the Michigan State Court of Appeals dicision HSLDA asked the family if they could take the case to the State Supreme Court. The family was not a member of this organization.
Latter, half the State was divided when HSLDA threw its support to a bill that had great potential to remove the rights homeschooling families had gained in the 1993 State Supreme Court cases. Thank the Lord homeschoolers in our state can declare (we are not required to register) themselves as private schools or homeschools.
The funny thing is HSLDA has done some very fine things but they have also stirred up lots of trouble as well.
. . .'Maine Liberals' . . .more than just a name; and perhaps too kind for these people.
Should read. . .'little frickin communists' -
And their rhetoric is 'jack-booted'. . .
Worse than that it is judicial tyranny!
I don't remember the person who said it or if it is the right quote, "It is too late to revolt and too early to shoot them", I may be wrong.
Screw MA, screw the Department of Socialist Services.
You are a moron
Why wouldn't a homeschooling parent test their kids"
because the kids are theirs, not the states you simple minded boob
They should change the name of the site to www.ipll.org (Internet Public Library of Liberalism). LOL! Like any branch library in a city, they carefully cull the available material.
I can and had you done a simple search through any noted record of quotes you could have also.
But that was not the point was it? You would rather assassinate the character of someone you disagree with. Imply some shady standard of practice on my part.
Why would you even think the I would post some bogus quote? On FreeRepublic no less... I would get caught.
As Jeff Foxworthy would say, "Here's your sign".
What would John Adams think?
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.