Skip to comments.
Disinfopedia, the encyclopedia of propaganda
Disinfopedia, the encyclopedia of propaganda ^
Posted on 03/19/2003 4:02:40 AM PST by eabinga
Disinfopedia Main Page
From Disinfopedia, the encyclopedia of propaganda.
Welcome to Disinfopedia, a collaborative project to produce a directory of public relations firms, think tanks, industry-funded organizations and industry-friendly experts that work to influence public opinion and public policy on behalf of corporations, governments and special interests. We are already working on 279 articles.
Anyone, including you, can edit any article right now. See the Disinfopedia FAQ for more background information about the project. Read the help page and experiment in the sandbox to learn how you can use and contribute to the Disinfopedia.
The content of Disinfopedia is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License, which means that it is free and will remain so forever. See Disinfopedia:Copyrights for the details and open content and free content for background.
Propaganda and the Current War Crisis
As the United States moves closer to a unilateral declaration of war with Iraq, public understanding of war propaganda has become a matter of vital concern. For up-to-date analysis, we hope you will use (and contribute to) our essay titled "Weapons of mass deception."
Articles Organized by Topic
Research and Writing Tips
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: disinfopedia; propaganda; publicrelations; wiki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
I am posting this in the hope that someone may see his or her calling to monitor this site and perhaps counter some of the outrageous stuff that without doubt will be posted there.
It is Wiki based, so basically anybody can post and edit on the site.
1
posted on
03/19/2003 4:02:40 AM PST
by
eabinga
To: eabinga
I am posting this in the hope that someone may see his or her calling to monitor this site and perhaps counter some of the outrageous stuff that without doubt will be posted there.
Thank you for the information. On my initial perusal, I've not managed to uncover anything on ANSWER, MoveOn, CAIR, World Workers Party, etc.
Can you imagine my surprise? </sarcasm OFF>
To: eabinga
As the United States moves closer to a unilateral declaration of war with Iraq, Guess they know a thing or two about propaganda...
3
posted on
03/19/2003 4:49:40 AM PST
by
xlib
To: eabinga
Speaking of PR....I have become convinced that Saddam has learned quite a bit in this arena over the last decade. In fact, I think we will find he's been getting help from the likes of Ramsey Clark and others in this matter. He's learned to feed into the arguments of the American Left - even to the extent of using the same words. I'm not a big conspiracy theorist, but his PR campaign looks all too concerted.
To: xlib
Guess they know a thing or two about propaganda... They keep repeating this "unilateralist" term. 45 nations minus Germany and France is unilateralists....
5
posted on
03/19/2003 5:12:46 AM PST
by
smith288
("The reason I am not a liberal is because im not as certain about my guesswork" -Dennis Miller)
To: smith288
Too bad the main page is protected, but I will try to edit some of the others.
6
posted on
03/19/2003 5:19:49 AM PST
by
eabinga
To: smith288
I just changed
"Outside the United States, however, few nations support the Bush administration's plans"
into
"Outside the United States, however, at least 45 nations support the Bush administration's plans"
Lets see how long it stays up....
7
posted on
03/19/2003 5:24:55 AM PST
by
eabinga
To: eabinga
Their homepage states they're a project of PR Watch / Center for Media & Democracy.
Here's a little bit about what consumerfreedom.com has to say about this group:
The Center for Media & Democracy (CMD) is a counterculture public relations effort disguised as an independent media organization. CMD isnt really a center it would be more accurate to call it a partnership, since it is essentially a two-person operation.
Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber operate, as do most self-anointed progressive watchdogs, from the presumption that any communication issued from a corporate headquarters must be viewed with a jaundiced eye. In their own quarterly PR Watch newsletter, they recently referred to corporate PR as a propaganda industry, misleading citizens and manipulating minds in the service of special interests. Ironically, Rampton and Stauber have elected to dip into the deep pockets of multi-million-dollar foundations with special interest agendas of their own.
Their books Mad Cow U.S.A. and Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! were produced and promoted using grant monies from the Foundation for Deep Ecology ($25,000) and the Education Foundation of America ($20,000), among others. Along with the more recent Trust Us: Were Experts, these books are scare-mongering tales about a corporate culture out of control, and each implies that the public needs rescuing. Guess who the heroes in this fantasy are?
Despite his wild claims that federal agencies have covered up U.S. mad cow disease cases, John Stauber has become a quotable celebrity on the subject. In 1997, at the height of the initial mad-cow panic, a CMD press release warned: Evidence suggests there may already be a mad-cow-type of disease infecting both U.S. pigs and cattle. Rampton and Stauber have never provided any documentation to back up this reckless claim; no cases of mad-cow disease have ever been documented in U.S. livestock. John Stauber was one of only four mad-cow experts offered to reporters by Fenton Communications media arm, Environmental Media Services.
You can read more about them here:
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/activistcash/org_detail.cfm?ORG_ID=12
8
posted on
03/19/2003 5:52:03 AM PST
by
Nickname
To: Nickname
Bumped, cut, copied, & saved. (BCCS)
9
posted on
03/19/2003 6:01:07 AM PST
by
A_perfect_lady
(Let them eat cake.)
To: eabinga
Are you the author or hacking?
10
posted on
03/19/2003 6:09:21 AM PST
by
smith288
("The reason I am not a liberal is because im not as certain about my guesswork" -Dennis Miller)
To: eabinga
All your web pages are belong to us. He he :)
11
posted on
03/19/2003 6:18:34 AM PST
by
Search4Truth
(Power perceived, is power achieved.)
To: smith288
I am neither the author nor am I hacking.
Anybody may change the contents of the pages (per GPL license), just sign up for an account and you too may correct/edit/add/revise/delete to the collection.
12
posted on
03/19/2003 6:23:42 AM PST
by
eabinga
To: eabinga
Thanks for posting this site!
13
posted on
03/19/2003 6:43:40 AM PST
by
yoe
To: eabinga
It is very easy to go in and make comments on existing postings there - to set the record straight. Clearly this was set up as a left wing site, but since it is Wiki based you can create your own postings or edit existing postings.
I recommend that instead of trashing existing postings, just post corrective comments.
To: eabinga
"As the United States moves closer to a unilateral declaration of war with Iraq, public understanding of war propaganda has become a matter of vital concern."I guess we now know why some overly persistant morons are continung to use that word, no matter how many countries are in the coalition against Saddam.
Hitler's propaganda was designed to appeal to the fears of the public as much as possible. It took his party 14 years of patient, persistant propaganda to worm their message into the public heart, mind and psyche.
Nazi propaganda was seen as a moral duty, to ensure the public "confidently and clearly understands National Socialism's policies, quickly and correctly...Political propaganda is the highest responsibility, it is a moral duty, a national duty. We may never think there is too much of it, or that it is superfluous." (--Dr. Josef Wells, Political Propaganda as Moral Duty, 1936)
The Third Reich also wrote the book on using the entertainment industry as a powerful propaganda tool. (--Film as Weapon, 1937)
"The term socialism is commonly used to refer both to an ideology--a comprehensive set of beliefs or ideas about the nature of human society and its future desirable state--and to a state of society based on that ideology. Socialists have always claimed to stand above all for the values of equality, social justice, cooperation, progress, and individual freedom and happiness, and they have generally sought to realize these values by the abolition of the private-enterprise economy and its replacement by "public ownership," a system of social or state control over production and distribution. Methods of transformation advocated by socialists range from popular education through constitutional change (achieving parliamentary majorities, for example) to violent revolution. ( definition from Anarchism, Marxism, and Socialism/Communism --Thinkquest )
The Third Way = the Third Reich. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
15
posted on
03/19/2003 6:53:32 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: Nickname
In their own quarterly PR Watch newsletter, they recently referred to corporate PR as a propaganda industry,
misleading citizens and manipulating minds in the service of special interests.Something I'm sure they know a thing or two about.
16
posted on
03/19/2003 7:07:49 AM PST
by
Valin
(Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
To: GirlShortstop
It is easy to create information here. I just posted on A.N.S.W.E.R. To find it, from the main page click on "list of lists" and then on "front groups", or just click here:
front groups.
You will see that now there is a reference to ANSWER, created by me. Enjoy!
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: xlib
As the United States moves closer to a unilateral declaration of war with Iraq, So what?
BFD
19
posted on
03/19/2003 8:35:55 AM PST
by
ppaul
To: hellinahandcart; kristinn
Ever been reading a page of lie-soaked leftist propaganda on the web and wished you could edit in the truth? Here's your chance!
20
posted on
03/19/2003 8:42:15 AM PST
by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson