Skip to comments.
BREAKING NEWS!!! SADDAM ATTACKING PREMPTIVELY???
FoxNews
| .
| .
Posted on 03/13/2003 4:59:55 PM PST by Drewman626
7:53pm EST
FoxNews Alert just reported that Iraqi troops have left Baghdad with heavy artillary and are heading south to the Kuwaiti boarder. More troops with SCUD missle launchers are heading west. The thought is that Saddam is about to attack our troops.
This is breaking news and details are few and far between.
TURN ON FOX
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 721-726 next last
To: GOPyouth; Admin Moderator
Good point,.... I agree...
Should this headline be changed? It may lead people to believe that Iraq is attacking, when in reality it is major troop movements...
101
posted on
03/13/2003 5:23:30 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("No I'm never gonna do it without the fez on... oh no...")
To: Drewman626
Hmmmm? I wonder if this started this morning and is the reason the President cancelled his planned event on the Hill ...??
102
posted on
03/13/2003 5:23:34 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: Dog Gone
wouldn't this be a good time to move things? We are still farting around with the UN..he can get his things ready to knock some of our guys out
To: Petronski
Go stand by the stairs
so we can teach you the terrible secret of space.
Shover Robot
To: clamboat
Here's info on the scud variants that Iraq had in '91. The limit imposed at the end of the Gulf war was 150KM.
The Iraqis had four versions: Scud itself (180-km range), longer-range Scud (half warhead weight, extra range attained by burning all propellant immediately rather than steadily through the flight of the missile), Al Hussein (650-km, attained by reducing warhead weight to 250 kg and increasing the fuel load by 15 percent), and Al Abbas (800-km, achieved by reducing warhead weight to 125 kg, with 30 percent more fuel). Al Abbas could be fired only from static launchers; all of the others could be fired from mobile or static sites. Only the original Scud and the minimally modified version were particularly succesful."
105
posted on
03/13/2003 5:24:01 PM PST
by
Kadric
To: Drewman626
FoxNews Alert just reported that Iraqi troops have left Baghdad with heavy artillary and are heading south to the Kuwaiti boarder. More troops with SCUD missle launchers are heading west. Should be a target-rich environment. But it also shows why we tried so hard to station an armored division in Turkey near the northern Iraqi border.
106
posted on
03/13/2003 5:24:09 PM PST
by
kesg
To: dep
Actually ... we could tell them the war didn't start yet and they have to go back home ...??? LOLOLOL
107
posted on
03/13/2003 5:24:27 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: wardaddy
Maybe they got sandbagged, but paybacks can be a bitch!
To: jacquej
I have a funny feeling that at some point during the war... we'll "loose" a missle and it will go "astray" and "accidentely" hit that reactor in Iran.
To: Drewman626
Hey, how did they get authorization from the U.N. so fast?
To: katana
If Fox News knows about this what do you think the screen watchers at NSA have been looking at?That'd be even worse if they watched the preparation and Saddam still managed to get off a first strike.
Face it, a first strike is all Saddam has available to him, after that his entire infrastructure would be a shambles. Much better for us if we strike first and take away the bulk of his capabilities.
To: jacquej
Don't forget, 0 deliveries to the Pentagon has the same predictive value as a record number of deliveries! LOL
To: Miss Marple
Thanks for the clarification.
I doubt we'd be so lucky as to have Saddam attack first. He thinks he's winning the diplomatic war.
To: prairiebreeze
>>Someone on this or another thread speculated that's precisely what he might be up to. Hit Israel, force them to retaliate and turn it into a ME vs. US/Isreal war<<
This is an example of 90s thinking.
If we are going to war (real war), who do we want on our side?
Jews or Arabs?
The absolute last thing on earth these ragheads need is the Jews on their case along with 50 000 pissed off Marines.
To: Drewman626
Gee, even Sadam's getting sick our our stalling.
115
posted on
03/13/2003 5:25:04 PM PST
by
Hildy
To: Trust but Verify
Saddam might be insane, but he is not stupid. There will be no pre-emptive attack. You may be correct that there will be no pre-emptive attack, of course, but I just don't know where people get off making comments like "Saddam might be insane, but he is not stupid". (Or "Saddam is evil but not suicidal" or any of these variants.) How exactly did a layperson like yourself gain such insight into the details of Saddam Hussein's personality?
Frankly, the guy seems pretty frickin' stupid to me. But then again I'm no expert on his psychology, mentality, and intelligence (unlike you) ;-P
To: Orangedog
}FOX isn't doing real news either tonight. More tabloid crap.
How many times can they rerun those STALE old video clips until the tape wears out?
117
posted on
03/13/2003 5:25:52 PM PST
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls history.)
To: mrsalty
The heck with the UN,If he launches scuds at Israel again this time all HE$$ gonna break loose You're right.
A single Scud with a Radioactive/ Biological/ VX gas would present a very real threat to Isreal. I'd love to see the Iraqi's liberated but if anything is launched at Isreal the US had better stand back because Isreal will use some of it's Nukes. There might not be many Iraqi's who would survive.
To: Jhoffa_
Well, Saddam's biggest mistakes in the last two wars was that after taking his immediate objectives, Iran's major oil port city and Kuwait, he stopped and let his enemies regroup. Perhaps he's fighting the last war again?
P.S. There ain't no sexual tension between Frodo and Samwise. *g*
119
posted on
03/13/2003 5:26:56 PM PST
by
LenS
To: cabin
The "no fly" zones apply to aircraft and such. I don't think ground troops and artillery are covered.
However, I will defer to someone with more expertise on the subject.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 721-726 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson