Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BILL CLINTON TO EXPLAIN HIS RECESSION ON CBS’ “60 MINUTES” (RNC Research)
Republican National Committee ^ | 8 March 2003 | RNC Research

Posted on 03/08/2003 5:29:15 PM PST by PhiKapMom

RNC RESEARCH

BILL CLINTON TO EXPLAIN HIS RECESSION ON CBS’ “60 MINUTES”

Months Before Final 60 Minutes Ran Out On Clinton Administration, The Economic Recession Had Already Begun

_______________________________________________________

“President Bush’s main economic policy -- the large tax cut of last year was not responsible for any of the current damage [to the economy]. Indeed, given the twin shocks of 9/11 and the post-Enron stock market decline, the short-term stimulus created by the tax cuts has turned out to be fortuitously well timed.” (Editorial, “Negative Al Gore,” The Washington Post, October 5, 2002)

ECONOMIC DATA CONFIRMS SLOWDOWN BEGAN UNDER CLINTON

Economic Statistics Confirm U.S. Economy Was Shrinking While Clinton Was In Office. “America went into recession long before the terrorist attacks of September 11th. … The new figures suggest … that the economy grew more slowly in … 2000 than was previously thought: GDP rose by 3.8% (compared with last year’s estimate of 4.1% and an initial figure of 5%).” (“Unwelcome Numbers,” The Economist, 8/3/02)

Market Indicators Confirm Recession Started On Clinton’s Watch. According to the Council of Economic Advisors, “it was widely recognized that the economy was weak coming into 2001.”

* The NASDAQ peaked on March 10, 2000;

* The S&P 500 peaked on March 24, 2000;

* The Dow Jones peaked on January 14, 2000;

* Manufacturing employment started falling in August 2000;

* Industrial production started falling in July 2000; and

* Manufacturing trade and sales started falling in April 2000.

(Council Of Economic Advisors, Talking Points, 9/20/02)

Congress’ Joint Economic Committee Says Signs Of Economic Slowdown Were Apparent In Mid 2000. “By mid-year 2000 … signs of an economic slowdown began to proliferate; it became apparent that an economic slowdown was underway. A number of key economic and financial indicators provided evidence of such slower growth and suggested that future growth could weaken. A brief summary of important elements of this evidence, for example, would include the following:

* Real GDP slowed from a robust 5.6 percent annualized growth rate in the second quarter of 2000 to 2.2 percent and 1.0 percent in the third and fourth quarters, respectively, before rebounding modestly to 1.2% in the first quarter of 2001.

* Key components of GDP such as real consumption expenditures slowed after mid-year as real income growth moderated, stock market values fell, employment gains lessened, and consumer confidence stalled and then deteriorated. Movements in retail sales generally corroborated these developments.

* Gross private investment also contributed significantly to this general slowdown with most key investment categories registering actual declines by the fourth quarter and advances of non-defense capital goods (ex-aircraft and parts) orders falling sharply after mid-year (on a year-over-year basis).

* The index of leading indicators trended down after January 2000.

* Employment advances slowed dramatically after mid-year. Gains in total non-farm payrolls, for example, averaged about 256,000 per month for the 2 1/2 years prior to mid-year 2000 and 44,000 per month after mid-year 2000. The average workweek also decreased after mid-year.

* The manufacturing sector also has weakened significantly since mid-year 2000. Industrial production, capacity utilization, the Natural Association of Purchasing Managers index, as well as manufacturing employment and workweek have all registered significant declines since mid-year 2000.

* Financial equity markets began to deteriorate about mid-year 2000 as well.

In short, there can be little doubt that a significant economic slowdown or retrenchment began about mid-year 2000 in the last quarters of the Clinton Administration.” (“Assessment Of The Current Economic Environment,” United States Congress Joint Economic Committee, 7/01)

Clinton’s Chairman Of Council Of Economic Advisors, Joseph Stiglitz, Said Recession Started During Clinton’s Tenure. “It would be nice for us veterans of the Clinton Administration if we could simply blame mismanagement by President George W. Bush’s economic team for this seemingly sudden turnaround in the economy, which coincided so closely with its taking charge. But … the economy was slipping into recession even before Bush took office, and the corporate scandals that are rocking America began much earlier.” (Joseph Stiglitz, “The Roaring Nineties,” The Atlantic Monthly, 10/02)

Stiglitz noted that during the Clinton Administration “the groundwork for some of the problems we are now experiencing was being laid. Accounting standards slipped; deregulation was taken further than it should have been; and corporate greed was pandered to ….” (Joseph Stiglitz, “The Roaring Nineties,” The Atlantic Monthly, 10/02)

Clinton Administration Grossly Overestimated Strength Of The Economy. “Hidden in the morass of statistics, there is proof that the Clinton administration grossly overestimated the strength of the economy leading up to the 2000 election. Did the federal government join Enron and WorldCom in cooking the books? … Most startling, the Commerce Department in 2000 showed the economy on an upswing through most of the election year, while in fact it was declining.” (Robert Novak, Op-Ed, “Sunny Clinton Forecast Leaves Cloud Over Bush,” Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/02)

Drop In Investments In First Half Of 2000 Contributed To Recession. “A plunge in investment that began in the last half of 2000, along with the declines in equity markets, was an important force in the recession.” (Council Of Economic Advisers, “Strengthening America’s Economy: The President’s Jobs And Growth Proposals,” 1/7/03)

A Publication of the RNC Research Department


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bewarebubbaisms; billclinton; bubba; cbs; clinton; clintoneconomy; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; criesoncue; dotcoms; economy; hypocrite; impeachedpresident; internetboom; internetbust; liar; liesoncamera; liesunderoath; neededajob; recession; seebs; viacom; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2003 5:29:16 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark; Alex P. Keaton; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; ..
Please distribute to everyone you know!

Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?
2 posted on 03/08/2003 5:30:29 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I was reading through some press conferences and such the other day from 1998 I found on google.com/unclesam and came across some similar information regarding the economy from 1998. While things were looking ok there were worries being addressed back then about the bubble and some of the things they were planning on doing to address their concerns. If I dig it up again I will post the link.
3 posted on 03/08/2003 5:32:30 PM PST by chance33_98 (Government cannot give freedom, it can only take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?

To offset the cost of his Viagra maybe :)

4 posted on 03/08/2003 5:33:07 PM PST by chance33_98 (Government cannot give freedom, it can only take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
He's already saying the first one didn't go very well.

We are doomed by our represenatives.
5 posted on 03/08/2003 5:33:33 PM PST by Howlin (Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
**Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?**

No and I'm likely not to even watch the show. Don't think my stomach, nervous system or mental health can take the double whammy of SlickWilly and CBS.

However I will read here and see what other FReepers think before deciding if I take my shoes off and jump into this one. Too many piles of troll poop to avoid in the media these days as it is.

Prairie
6 posted on 03/08/2003 5:34:34 PM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?

To learn new pick up lines?

7 posted on 03/08/2003 5:35:23 PM PST by b4its2late (If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?

I'm sorry, but between this, the viagra ads and the Pepsi commericial where he's ogling Britney Spears, Bob Dole has official become a media whore.

Next, he'll be the center square on Hollywood Squares.

8 posted on 03/08/2003 5:36:30 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines (Ithaca is the City of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Great post......Hopefully CNN/PBS/NBC/CBS/PMSNBC/NPR/ABC/NYT/WASHPOST/ etc will report the facts too - but on the other hand I think naaaa....facts are stubborn things for liberals.
9 posted on 03/08/2003 5:40:03 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I like Bob Dole but he should have never agreed to this. He is the man who lost to Clinton, not the face of the current Republican party. Clinton, on the other hand, is the man who can't let go and continues to be the face of his party. Dole, unless he surprises me, is no match for Clinton.
10 posted on 03/08/2003 5:45:59 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Still don't know why Bob Dole agreed to go on 60 Minutes with Clinton -- do you?

Maybe he is like Bubba: he'll do anything to keep his face and name in everyone's minds.

11 posted on 03/08/2003 5:48:25 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Just how was it that Dole was "selected" as Repub candidate against the "new JFK"? Was it simply his turn b/c he'd been around forever and would be his last shot. I still can't believe it.

Isn't his Senate retirement generous enough without the commercial spots?

12 posted on 03/08/2003 5:50:39 PM PST by banjo joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: banjo joe
Perhaps, Dole was selected so that the Dims could have a big laugh at the Republicans. You know, pick someone who has to take a pill to get it up.
13 posted on 03/08/2003 5:52:22 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Exactly as I suspected. The Reagan Economic expansion ran up until mid 2000, when the Clinton Recession began.
14 posted on 03/08/2003 5:59:04 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
bump for later reading
15 posted on 03/08/2003 6:03:34 PM PST by RobFromGa (All Real Americans Support our Troops 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
If it was up to Clinton he would have picked Reagan. The best man to put Clinton in his deserved place would have been Newt. It won't happen, CBS etal. have a goal to build up The Clinton Legacy.
16 posted on 03/08/2003 6:06:20 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
. "Dole, unless he surprises me, is no match for Clinton."

Did you read the story put out by CBS on how he was
picked? I won't even put the link up, it's so
much BS!I will bet that Clinton had to agree who
was the counterpoint! This is a new low in ex
Presidents. Have you read the peanut farmers new
statements? A friend called and told me, you have to
register at the NYT's to read it. I will not!!
It is anti war, anti Bush, says he knows what a just
war is, and this isn't one!!!
17 posted on 03/08/2003 6:06:40 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
. "Dole, unless he surprises me, is no match for Clinton."

Did you read the story put out by CBS on how he was
picked? I won't even put the link up, it's so
much BS!I will bet that Clinton had to agree who
was the counterpoint! This is a new low in ex
Presidents. Have you read the peanut farmers new
statements? A friend called and told me, you have to
register at the NYT's to read it. I will not!!
It is anti war, anti Bush, says he knows what a just
war is, and this isn't one!!!
18 posted on 03/08/2003 6:07:36 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bill Clinton made at least 35 million last year. He and his homely/frigid wife have always been about the money. When they said Bill Clinton did not care about money it was absurd!

It takes big bucks to get the stuff they want. Private jets, homes and the best of the best.

Clinton must keep his face on TV to be marketable. As far as Dole? Same basic reasons.

19 posted on 03/08/2003 6:11:35 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; All
Rush is planning to tape each of Clinton's responses and then pretend he is debating him. I sure wish by some miracle they had chosen Rush to face off with Clinton in the first place. It would have boosted the show ratings, but the execs weren't interested in someone who could actually introduce Clinton to the truth.
20 posted on 03/08/2003 6:16:13 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson