Snappy Answers To Stupid Antiwar Soundbites

The Jewish Press ^ | 3/5/2003 | Tom Adkins

[Normal4me]

Bump for the truth.

[veronica]

Good one. Posters are encouraged to add their own version of "Snappy Answers To Stupid Antiwar Soundbites." :))

[Free Vulcan]

I like it!

[weegee]

27) “These problems didn`t happen under Clinton.”

Here is an example of that rotten man's idea of leadership, push it aside for another administration to deal with more resolutely. The impeached president X42 Bubba Clinton didn't want to have to deal with Saddam so he bombed what he believed to be some of Saddam's weapons program to set him back a few years so Bubba wouldn't have to deal with it (leave this mess for some later President).

Read this from the recent Atlantic interview with Der Slickmeister:

So I think we have to try to give the sanctions one more chance. He's not going to live forever,[NOTE: This strategy has worked wonders in deposing Fidel Castro < /sarcasm >] there are options for regime change short of bombing the living daylights out of them. And we know that these... we know that the inspectors have gotten a ton of stuff out of there. But the effort of trying will bring us together.

[londwinded snip...]

But I'm pretty sure this is the right thing to do. Press ahead with this thing, try to.... we knew when we did the bombing in '98 that we hit all the known or suspected sites based on the intelligence we had, from all the people that were doing that work there. we knew at the time that we had set his program back a couple years. But sooner or later in the millennium the new Administration, whether it was Gore's or Bush's, would have to take this matter up again.

[bert]

Book marked for memorization

[Libloather]

“We are in a rush to war.”

Unca Teddy said something like this just this past week.

What a goober...

[Gamecock]

Bump and Bookmark

[reformed_democrat]

What a great list!

Thanks, veronica.

[Howlin]

3) “Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without our having to invade Iraq.”

And 250,000 military right on the border.

[giotto]

23) “War will cost billions!”

The cost to clean up just New York after 9/11, at last count, was more than $105 billion. And that's just the money. What about the lives lost, the lives ruined, the jobs lost, the damage to our economy?

[Howlin]

Joint Congressional Resolution #114

Question about that resolution:

Did it say that Bush had to go to the U.N.?

[dagoofyfoot]

I love these debates. The left is so mindless that they think we don't notice that they put their political ambitions ahead of national security. Therefore they can't really make an intelligent argument.


The same people that protest us going to war will be the same ones that will want the President removed when we get the next terrorist attack, claiming he didn't do enough to protect us.


Our Christian conservative President won't get the approval of the hardcore left no matter what he does.

[talleyman]

another bump

[hunter112]

"It's all about oil!"

That's why we're sending troops to Canada, Mexico and Venezuela, right?

[maranatha]

Bump

[workerbee]

I only take issue with #22 -- this is NOT pre-emptive. It's a continuation of hostilities from '91 that were never resolved. Saddam Insane never met the terms that defined the "end" of that war. We will now ensure that he does, once and for all.

#18 is my favorite: “Polls show Europeans are against this war.” Polls show Europeans believe their freedom was achieved by endlessly debating in marvelous dining halls, conveniently forgetting their right to be pompous blowhards was granted with American blood, not fabulous wine and Brie.

That's beautiful!

[at bay]

16 Belgium is unsure what to do."

That's what they do. They waffle. That's who they are.