Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snappy Answers To Stupid Antiwar Soundbites
The Jewish Press ^ | 3/5/2003 | Tom Adkins

Posted on 03/08/2003 12:41:10 PM PST by veronica

Use this handy guide to tell you which snappy answer to give whenever a liberal uses stupid soundbites to help Saddam Hussein.

1) “The United States is taking unilateral action against Iraq.”

So far, it`s a 90-member worldwide "unilateral" coalition.

2) “We are in a rush to war.”

An 11-year rush?

3) “Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without our having to invade Iraq.”

Eleven years of inspections have done wonders so far.

4) “We should let the inspectors finish their job.”

We did. They didn`t. We will.

5) “Why fight? The Iraqi military is weaker than in 1991.”

But their biological and chemical weapons are much more dangerous.

6) “There`s no proof of those weapons.”

We know they have `em, we know they hide `em, and we have tape recordings and photographs. What more is needed? An Iraqi rocket in Martin Sheen`s pocket?

7) “If we invade, Saddam might use those weapons of mass destruction against us.”

I thought you said Iraq didn`t have them?

8) “But terrorists might attack if we invade Iraq.”

Oh — so if we don`t attack Iraq, terrorists will never strike again?

9) “We shouldn`t go to war without a UN resolution.”

ANOTHER resolution? What about the last 16 resolutions? Shall we use them as wallpaper? Or shall we use the same resolutions Bill Clinton used in Bosnia?

10) “We don`t have a real declaration for war.”

It`s called "Joint Congressional Resolution #114.

11) “We are giving $20 billion to Turkey. We could use that money at home.”

OK, we`ll use that money to strengthen our Iraqi border with Wyoming.

12) “If North Korea has nuclear weapons, why aren`t we invading them first?”

Uh, hello, isn`t that the point?

13) “European leaders are against the war.”

The Reichstag wasn`t attacked. The Grande Place wasn`t attacked. The Kremlin wasn`t attacked. And the Jerry Lewis Lifetime Achievement Museum wasn`t attacked. America was attacked. And besides, even with the tantrums of France, Belgium and Germany, only three European nations aren`t willing to defend freedom. The rest of Europe is with America.

14) “The French don`t support the war.”

Oh — did they surrender already?

15) “Germany objects to this war.”

Germany objected to Reagan`s "attitude" toward the Soviet Union. Of course, they objected to our presence in 1943 as well.

16) “Belgians are against the war.”

I can live without waffles and ice cream.

17) “The Russians don’t support the war.”

They’re still angry over Reagan`s brilliant Cold War victory.

18) “Polls show Europeans are against this war.”

Polls show Europeans believe their freedom was achieved by endlessly debating in marvelous dining halls, conveniently forgetting their right to be pompous blowhards was granted with American blood, not fabulous wine and Brie.

19) “We should build a coalition with our friends.”

With friends like these, who needs enemies?

20) “What happens if we can`t build a United Nations coalition?”

Who cares?

21) “But the UN is the world`s most respected governing body.”

Not as respected as the U.S. military.

22) “America has always waited until enemies attacked.”

Now that oceans can`t hold back enemies, pre-emptive war is forever a necessity.

23) “War will cost billions!”

So — how much is YOUR city worth?

24) “President Bush says he`s willing to violate the 1976 executive order forbidding assassinations of foreign leaders.”

As soon as the ink is dry on rescinding that idiotic order, will someone please pull the trigger? The line forms to the right.”

25) “Many senators don`t support Bush.”

Are you speaking of the senators from Bordeaux?

26) “Tom Daschle says George Bush has a ‘credibility gap’”

When was the last time we came to Tom Daschle for the truth?

27) “These problems didn`t happen under Clinton.”

Actually, they happened. But Clinton ignored them. Now Bush will clean up his mess.

28) “But Clinton didn`t start a war.”

Not unless his girlfriend was testifying before Congress.

29) “The first President Bush should have taken out Hussein in `91.”

That 1991 UN resolution forbade a march on Baghdad. Remember?

30) “Millions of peace activists are demanding we stop the march to war.”

Millions of Iraqis are begging for us to start the war.

31) “Thousands of innocents will be killed or injured.”

That`s a lot less than Hussein has killed and is killing.

32) “Young Americans will die in battle.”

Would you prefer they die in skyscrapers?

33) “Protesters have genuine objections to war.”

Just like they did in Somalia? Bosnia?

34) “People are coming from all over the world to be human shields on behalf of Saddam.”

Quick, hurry before the bombs start dropping.

35) “This is about American imperialism.”

So which country do we own? What nation sends us its tax dollars? If America were imperialist, we`d already own the entire world. Who could stand in our way?

36) “This is blood for oil.”

The only blood here has been that of Iraqis tortured, starved and killed while Hussein builds massive palaces to hide nuclear weapons — all financed with Iraqi oil.

37) “This is a racist war.”

America happily endorses a multicultural attitude toward anyone who dares to take away our freedom. Regardless of race, color or creed, we hunt them down and kill them.

38) “A U.S.-led invasion of Iraq is a great recruiting tool for terrorists.”

Have fun recruiting people into oppressive misery as they enjoy their first taste of freedom.

39) “An attack on Iraq could seriously undermine and destabilize Arab nations.”

Destabilize the region? The sooner we topple these oppressive 14th century terrorist regimes the better.

40) “Are we prepared for a multi-billion dollar occupation?”

Were we prepared to liberate Europe and Japan in 1945? South Korea in 1953? Grenada? El Salvador? Kuwait? The Eastern Bloc? Afghanistan? Nations always love Americans when we rescue them from tyranny. The price of freedom is never free.

41) “Polls show Americans are more concerned about the threat from Al Qaeda than the threat from Iraq.”

It`s not a war against Al Qaeda. It`s not a war against Iraq. It`s a war against terrorism. Anywhere we find it. One nation at a time.

42) “American opinion is against the war.”

No, it`s not. A majority of Americans want to fight now, not later.

43) “According to a recent poll...”

You know what? Flush those polls. We`re in a war against terrorism. If you don`t want to fight the vile murderers, get the hell out of the way. Go visit Paris. Or Antwerp. Or Berlin. Or Moscow. And stay there. Forever. But this time, don`t call us when the Visigoths are at the gates.

Tom Adkins is publisher of the website CommonConservative.com, where this column originally appeared.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2003 12:41:10 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica
Bump for the truth.
2 posted on 03/08/2003 12:51:35 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: walkingman
Good one. Posters are encouraged to add their own version of "Snappy Answers To Stupid Antiwar Soundbites." :))
4 posted on 03/08/2003 12:53:35 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I like it!
5 posted on 03/08/2003 12:56:33 PM PST by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
27) “These problems didn`t happen under Clinton.”

Here is an example of that rotten man's idea of leadership, push it aside for another administration to deal with more resolutely. The impeached president X42 Bubba Clinton didn't want to have to deal with Saddam so he bombed what he believed to be some of Saddam's weapons program to set him back a few years so Bubba wouldn't have to deal with it (leave this mess for some later President).

Read this from the recent Atlantic interview with Der Slickmeister:

So I think we have to try to give the sanctions one more chance. He's not going to live forever,[NOTE: This strategy has worked wonders in deposing Fidel Castro < /sarcasm >] there are options for regime change short of bombing the living daylights out of them. And we know that these... we know that the inspectors have gotten a ton of stuff out of there. But the effort of trying will bring us together.

[londwinded snip...]

But I'm pretty sure this is the right thing to do. Press ahead with this thing, try to.... we knew when we did the bombing in '98 that we hit all the known or suspected sites based on the intelligence we had, from all the people that were doing that work there. we knew at the time that we had set his program back a couple years. But sooner or later in the millennium the new Administration, whether it was Gore's or Bush's, would have to take this matter up again.


6 posted on 03/08/2003 12:57:10 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Book marked for memorization
7 posted on 03/08/2003 12:57:24 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica; Howlin; Liz; Mudboy Slim
“We are in a rush to war.”

Unca Teddy said something like this just this past week.

What a goober...

8 posted on 03/08/2003 12:58:18 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Bump and Bookmark
9 posted on 03/08/2003 12:59:29 PM PST by Gamecock (You take your Germany, France and Spain, roll them all together and it wouldn't give us room to park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
What a great list!

Thanks, veronica.

10 posted on 03/08/2003 1:03:51 PM PST by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
3) “Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without our having to invade Iraq.”

And 250,000 military right on the border.

11 posted on 03/08/2003 1:06:42 PM PST by Howlin (Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica
23) “War will cost billions!”

The cost to clean up just New York after 9/11, at last count, was more than $105 billion. And that's just the money. What about the lives lost, the lives ruined, the jobs lost, the damage to our economy?

12 posted on 03/08/2003 1:07:04 PM PST by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Joint Congressional Resolution #114

Question about that resolution:

Did it say that Bush had to go to the U.N.?
13 posted on 03/08/2003 1:08:08 PM PST by Howlin (Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I love these debates. The left is so mindless that they think we don't notice that they put their political ambitions ahead of national security. Therefore they can't really make an intelligent argument.


The same people that protest us going to war will be the same ones that will want the President removed when we get the next terrorist attack, claiming he didn't do enough to protect us.


Our Christian conservative President won't get the approval of the hardcore left no matter what he does.
14 posted on 03/08/2003 1:12:52 PM PST by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
another bump
15 posted on 03/08/2003 1:16:33 PM PST by talleyman (Violins never solved anything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: giotto
"It's all about oil!"

That's why we're sending troops to Canada, Mexico and Venezuela, right?

17 posted on 03/08/2003 1:18:26 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dagoofyfoot
Bump
18 posted on 03/08/2003 1:19:43 PM PST by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I only take issue with #22 -- this is NOT pre-emptive. It's a continuation of hostilities from '91 that were never resolved. Saddam Insane never met the terms that defined the "end" of that war. We will now ensure that he does, once and for all.

#18 is my favorite: “Polls show Europeans are against this war.” Polls show Europeans believe their freedom was achieved by endlessly debating in marvelous dining halls, conveniently forgetting their right to be pompous blowhards was granted with American blood, not fabulous wine and Brie.

That's beautiful!

19 posted on 03/08/2003 1:29:33 PM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
16 Belgium is unsure what to do."

That's what they do. They waffle. That's who they are.

20 posted on 03/08/2003 1:29:37 PM PST by at bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson