Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America Admits Suspects Died In Interrogations
Independent (UK) ^ | 3-7-2003 | Andrew Gumbel

Posted on 03/06/2003 6:23:26 PM PST by blam

America admits suspects died in interrogations

By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
07 March 2003

American military officials acknowledged yesterday that two prisoners captured in Afghanistan in December had been killed while under interrogation at Bagram air base north of Kabul – reviving concerns that the US is resorting to torture in its treatment of Taliban fighters and suspected al-Qa'ida operatives.

A spokesman for the air base confirmed that the official cause of death of the two men was "homicide", contradicting earlier accounts that one had died of a heart attack and the other from a pulmonary embolism.

The men's death certificates, made public earlier this week, showed that one captive, known only as Dilawar, 22, from the Khost region, died from "blunt force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease" while another captive, Mullah Habibullah, 30, suffered from blood clot in the lung that was exacerbated by a "blunt force injury".

US officials previously admitted using "stress and duress" on prisoners including sleep deprivation, denial of medication for battle injuries, forcing them to stand or kneel for hours on end with hoods on, subjecting them to loud noises and sudden flashes of light and engaging in culturally humiliating practices such as having them kicked by female officers.

While the US claims this still constitutes "humane" treatment, human rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have denounced it as torture as defined by international treaty. The US has also come under heavy criticism for its reported policy of handing suspects over to countries such as Jordan, Egypt or Morocco, where torture techniques are an established part of the security apparatus. Legally, Human Rights Watch says, there is no distinction between using torture directly and subcontracting it out.

Some American politicians have argued that torture could be justified in this case if it helped prevent terror attacks on US citizens. Jonathan Turley, a prominent law professor at George Washington University, countered that embracing torture would be "suicide for a nation once viewed as the very embodiment of human rights".

Torture is part of a long list of concerns about the Bush administration's respect for international law, after the extrajudicial killing of al-Qa'ida suspects by an unmanned drone in Yemen and the the indefinite detention of "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a number of whom have committed or attempted to commit suicide.

President Bush appeared to encourage extra-judicial solutions in his State of the Union address in January when he talked of al-Qa'ida members being arrested or meeting "a different fate". "Let's put it this way," he said in a tone that appalled many, "they are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: admits; america; antiamerican; antibush; died; interrogations; prisondeaths; propaganda; quitealeap; suspects; wherestheproof
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181 next last
To: blam
Uhhh, so what? Terrorists killed during interrogation is supposed to be news or something?
81 posted on 03/07/2003 4:27:01 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
You Are About To Learn

Old Fashioned American Justice

It’s Time, Saddam For Some . .


82 posted on 03/07/2003 6:24:46 AM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
As the AQ isn't protected by the Geneva Convention, they aren't protected by the US Constitution either. Except the ones that live here in the US now, thanks to a slack immigration/visa policy.

Folks, don't forget to focus on the fact that even if true, it's not for sadistic fun. Extraction of critical information needs to have an 'ante' to go to. If it were a sacred fact that we never used torture, we would NEVER get any intel from anybody. They would simply clam and sit back and grin.
83 posted on 03/07/2003 6:44:58 AM PST by thescourged1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
"We should do the right thing, instead of lowering ourselves to the level of the barabarians who attacked us."

Got news for you about fighting.... no such thing as a fair fight... You bring a knife.. I bring a gun.. you bring a gun... I bring a rifle and a friend with a gun.... you bring a rifle... I bring a hand grenade, rifle , machine gun sneak up behind you and kill you with my friend in front of you shooting.

Why do you think soldiers don't like to talk about battles... only about "the war" or in general terms.. bad stuff happens in combat and when your buddies or people you are protecting are dying.

By the way... Americans haven't always been treated by the Geneva Convention unless it suits the enemies propaganda agends. So grow up and turn your head if war makes you sick. It's supposed too make people sick or else we would do it more often. I'd wait and see for autopsies, if any are released before I jumped to conclusions against our military, cause men and women are dying and our guys are doing the best they can to end the killing as soon as possible.

84 posted on 03/07/2003 8:18:22 AM PST by Dick Vomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
If you had a son or daughter in the military, could you accept philosophically and emotionally, the thought of either being beaten, mutilated (or perhaps in the case of the daughter- gang raped)and made to suffer as long as possible before being murdered? I have mixed feelings too, but I must confess my fear of seeing done to my love ones, what we might to other's, makes me resist the very strong urge to say: "do whatever it takes!"
85 posted on 03/07/2003 8:32:34 AM PST by US admirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Riley
We are dealing with illegal combatants, not a recognized fighting force to which the Geneva Convention applies. Illegal combatants are liable to summary execution. That being so, just torturing them is quite humane.
86 posted on 03/07/2003 9:21:25 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Romulus; Truthsearcher
Its not a violation of our principles to act this way towards illegal combatants. Illegal combatants are not under the Geneva Convention. They are liable to summary execution, torture, indefinite detention in concentration camps, etc. THAY HAVE NO RIGHTS, HAVING FORFEITED THEM BY THEIR ACTS.
87 posted on 03/07/2003 9:25:43 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
There is nothing in the article to support the "while under interrogation" claim.

They were still in our custody. While not completely improbably, I don't think these guys would be able to cause the blunt force trauma that exaccerabted their conditions, so, in that case, that means someone else did.

I sincerely hope we are not resorting to physical tourture.

88 posted on 03/07/2003 9:36:13 AM PST by realpatriot71 (legalize freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
They probably didn't know the Secret Word of the Day.....
89 posted on 03/07/2003 9:37:37 AM PST by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It is just as likely, IMO, that they died at the hands of their fellow jihadists as punishment for being "too cooperative" with agents of "The Great Satan."

On the other hand, their deaths may have resulted from efforts to "make them feel at home" gone awry.....

90 posted on 03/07/2003 9:44:14 AM PST by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
You make no distinction between legalisms and American principles. I think most observers agree that the legal rights of the detainees are murky. This has nothing to do with American principles, however -- unless your view of American principles is that of exploiting loopholes because the end justifies any means.
91 posted on 03/07/2003 9:44:34 AM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: blam
The headline reads "died" and the body reads "killed". Which is it? There is a huge difference.
92 posted on 03/07/2003 9:46:42 AM PST by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer
I have mixed feelings too, but I must confess my fear of seeing done to my love ones, what we might to other's, makes me resist the very strong urge to say: "do whatever it takes!"

Do you think the people who might do that to your loved ones would give a flying hoot about your concerns?

Moderately evil people hear your qualms of conscience, and then have qualms of their own. However, truly evil people interpret your qualms of conscience as weakness. Then they kill you.

We did effectively nothing about this problem for 10 years. Our "concerns" and "fears" and "worries" and heartfelt wishes to make the bad men play nice and leave us alone got 3,000 of our citizens brutally murdered one fine fall day.

93 posted on 03/07/2003 9:55:20 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
DoughtyOne, there are many good arguments as to why we should not use torture, but the hope that it will spare Americans from torture by others is not very persuasive. Any opponent we are likely to be at war with will use torture at every opportunity.
94 posted on 03/07/2003 10:14:56 AM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
If this is true, then it goes against what we have said regarding the Geneva Convention standards that the USA swore to uphold and will reflect badly upon us.

From the Geneva convention

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

If they weren't wearing military uniforms they don't qualify.

95 posted on 03/07/2003 10:21:56 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam; newgeezer
I'm totally opposed to torture and am ashamed if we are actually doing it.
96 posted on 03/07/2003 10:25:04 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi
I am not in conflict with that point of view. As I wrote my comments I contemplated the same reality. The question is, do we wish to abolish the Geneva convention with regard to rules of conduct during war? We can't openly break those rules in the manner of our choice, then hold others to account for breaking them in the manner of their choice. That's my thought on it.
97 posted on 03/07/2003 10:29:29 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 7, Staterooms As Low As $510 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: US admirer
If you had a son or daughter in the military, could you accept philosophically and emotionally, the thought of either being beaten, mutilated (or perhaps in the case of the daughter- gang raped)and made to suffer as long as possible before being murdered? I have mixed feelings too, but I must confess my fear of seeing done to my love ones, what we might to other's, makes me resist the very strong urge to say: "do whatever it takes!"

that's why I wouldn't let my daughters serve.... My son will hopefully not be captured but if he is.... he knows that we don't leave people behind... usually, and trust me , Americans are tortured and killed with indescretion if they serve no useful purpose for the enemy. If you or your family have served the FEAR of torture, physical violence and death are the great obstacles to overcome.

If I captured somebody and they knew where my family was being held.... easy answer... blow torch and epson salts...

If I captured somebody who had raped and killed my daughters and was planning on having some of his friend come and do the same to my wife..... I'd ask the "prisoner" once if he knew the whereabouts of the next attackers then..... blow torch and pliers again.

I know that you would just sit idly by and ask "please tell me where the bad guys are?" maybe keep him awake for 24-48 hours while time ticks away and the bad men move.... not me, sorry... I have a very short attention span and would just cut to the chase and get the answers the old fashioned "messy" way.

That's what makes our country great... you have your opinions and I can have mine.... neat huh?

98 posted on 03/07/2003 10:39:42 AM PST by Dick Vomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: blam
Only two? Step up the pace or it will take too long.
99 posted on 03/07/2003 10:43:12 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
If this story is true, we all know it will show up in the American press (and trumpeted on the "D" side of the aisle). Until then at least, this is nothing more than just another piece of anti-American fiction.
100 posted on 03/07/2003 10:43:38 AM PST by newgeezer (If it's not somewhat cruel and unusual, it's not punishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson