Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police continue to pursue new leads
The Modesto Bee ^ | Posted: February 18, 2003 @ 05:05:10 AM PST | Modesto Bee staff

Posted on 02/18/2003 5:33:12 AM PST by runningbear

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:55:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Modesto police continue to pursue leads in the Laci Peterson case, and a spokesman said Monday that investigators have made some headway.

Also Monday, Peterson's mother-in-law appealed for help in finding the missing Modesto woman, who was due to give birth to a baby boy last week.


(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: lacipeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-558 next last
To: Velveeta
Maybe they'll check the "garden"...He couldn't have been THAT stupid?!!

sw

101 posted on 02/18/2003 9:54:38 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
Yes, sounds like LE gave the Rochas a heads up on the warrant and FOX news said the Rochas have been notified as to *why* they are focusing on Scott
102 posted on 02/18/2003 9:54:44 AM PST by Velveeta (they're coming, Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Fox news reporting LE looking for something *in* the house.
103 posted on 02/18/2003 9:55:30 AM PST by Velveeta (they're coming, Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Wednesday's Child
I feel very sorry for her too but.. you would think by now that someone would have pointed out just how pittifully unbelieveable her stories are becoming every time she tries to explain Scotty's behavior. And unfortunately since he has clammed up and all these contradictory statements are made by her, there is'nt much LE can be read into them. Also not much if any of it can be used in any future testimony if he is ever brought to trial.
104 posted on 02/18/2003 9:56:26 AM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
You hit on something. I think someone who broke in, was looking for clues...and something was OUT of sorts, or not in place.

So the person took something to make it look like a family token robbery.

sw

105 posted on 02/18/2003 9:56:49 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
Just what if they HAVE found her and they are tying in evidence? (I take my tin-foil hat off now)
106 posted on 02/18/2003 9:57:23 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: cherry
After the last year, I would NEVER take a polygraph. And the only way LE would get in to my house to search would be with a warrant.

I have a neighbor who is LE and he pretty much says the same thing.
107 posted on 02/18/2003 9:58:44 AM PST by Jaded (Why? Because they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
ALRIGHT!!! PRAYING THAT THINGS ARE STARTING TO ROLL!!!!
108 posted on 02/18/2003 9:59:31 AM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: spectre
NEW THREAD REGARDING THE SEARCH
109 posted on 02/18/2003 10:01:39 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta; All
PLEASE keep updating, I'm at work, TV deprived.
110 posted on 02/18/2003 10:02:14 AM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Well, if someone--a civilian--went in there, found something telling, and told police, that'll come back to haunt the police in any trial of Scott.

I imagine Scott's attorney would try very hard to argue that the civilian was actually acting at the behest of the authorities. In which case, the burglary/search would be illegal, in which case, all evidence springing from it would be inadmissible against Scott.

But... the police are aware of all this. I don't think they would make their evidence dependent in any way on whatever (if anything) the January "burglar" might have told them.
111 posted on 02/18/2003 10:02:38 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
That's progress. If they found something in the house and are going back for more, they should luminol while they are at it.
112 posted on 02/18/2003 10:03:17 AM PST by Jaded (Why? Because they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Oh, I just can't believe it...although people have buried the victims at home before...

Ridenour is saying the house is being searched. He's not sure Scott Peterson is home, or what they are looking for..

This is very strange.

Candice Delong says there are no other people she suspects, except Scott. Scott's behavior is in and of itself, self incriminating and conscienous (sp) of guilt.

sw

113 posted on 02/18/2003 10:03:42 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Perhaps (and I'm speculationg here) the DNA tests are all back and based on the evidence requested the new warrant.
114 posted on 02/18/2003 10:04:51 AM PST by Velveeta (they're coming, Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Yes, you nailed it, Jaded. The profiler was just saying the same thing. LUMINAL!!

sw

115 posted on 02/18/2003 10:07:18 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife (MPD, Do you know where SCOTT IS?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
I think your right.
116 posted on 02/18/2003 10:07:32 AM PST by pitinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: All
I saw a person with a shovel going into the back yard....

sw

117 posted on 02/18/2003 10:08:53 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife (MPD, Do you know where SCOTT IS?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Are you guys saying luminal wasn't done before?
118 posted on 02/18/2003 10:09:05 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: spectre
what channel sw?
119 posted on 02/18/2003 10:09:33 AM PST by melodie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: spectre
for real?
120 posted on 02/18/2003 10:12:35 AM PST by Velveeta (they're coming, Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-558 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson