To: Devil_Anse
You hit on something. I think someone who broke in, was looking for clues...and something was OUT of sorts, or not in place.
So the person took something to make it look like a family token robbery.
sw
105 posted on
02/18/2003 9:56:49 AM PST by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
To: spectre
109 posted on
02/18/2003 10:01:39 AM PST by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops....)
To: spectre
Well, if someone--a civilian--went in there, found something telling, and told police, that'll come back to haunt the police in any trial of Scott.
I imagine Scott's attorney would try very hard to argue that the civilian was actually acting at the behest of the authorities. In which case, the burglary/search would be illegal, in which case, all evidence springing from it would be inadmissible against Scott.
But... the police are aware of all this. I don't think they would make their evidence dependent in any way on whatever (if anything) the January "burglar" might have told them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson