Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Floats Idea of Dropping Income Tax (altogether)
New York Times, Business and Financial Desk, Page 14, Column 5 ^ | 2/8/2003 | EDMUND L. ANDREWS

Posted on 02/08/2003 5:56:38 PM PST by Bigun

White House Floats Idea of Dropping Income Tax Overhaul By EDMUND L. ANDREWS

WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 — President Bush, having already set off a firestorm over his proposals to cut taxes and revamp retirement accounts, suggested today that the time might be near to drop the income tax as a whole and replace it with some form of consumption tax...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; consumptiontax; incometax; nrst; taxreform; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 701-707 next last
To: IncPen
If I'm putting after-tax income into my retirement plans (like a Roth?), won't it be double taxed if I'm using those postponed dollars under a NRST down the road? Isn't the promise of such plans that you're not going to be taxed down the road? Am I missing something? How do you fix that?

No, you're not missing anything, and I don't see how it could be fixed either. Actually, it works far better for younger people - they would get to save and not have their savings taxed. Older people with IRAs, savings, etc. would get royally shafted, because of double taxation. In other words, all the people who traditionally vote Republican would suffer MORE. Actually, that is a bit of a deja vu kicker, because as I recall the 1986 "tax reform" had the same effect. Imagine that.

161 posted on 02/08/2003 7:54:07 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
FREE AT LAST FREE AT LAST THANK GOD OH MIGHTY WERE FREE AT LAST

Maybe!

162 posted on 02/08/2003 7:54:19 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (An American Fellowship of Freedom loving Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
Down with the IRS!!!!!!!!
163 posted on 02/08/2003 7:54:34 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigun; TLBSHOW
This is further evidence that our President W. is a thoroughgoing
(pragmatic, compassionate) c - o - n - s - e - r - v - a - t - i - v - e .
164 posted on 02/08/2003 7:58:29 PM PST by unspun (Compassionate Conservatism - beats the alternatives in either case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
The tax code is an abomination

Understatement alert
165 posted on 02/08/2003 7:58:52 PM PST by Valin (Age and Deceit, beat youth and skill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
According to recent work by Stanford University economist Joseph Kahn, those seniors with a net worth over $400 thousand (nearly four times the median) may see a reduction in their purchasing power. The largest decline in purchasing power, about 3.5 percent, is for those with net worth above about $700 thousand. The primary reason for this effect is that wealth spent for consumption purposes that is held in non-tax-deferred accounts like IRA's will be taxed when spent under a consumption tax and would not be taxed any further under current law. Seniors will be able to take comfort in the fact that their children and grandchildren will no longer be laboring under the yoke of the income tax, and will once again be able to see their own standard of living improve, one generation to the next.

Well, isn't that selfless of them, to watch all that money flow into the federal coffers. Sorry, I don't buy it. I would lobby heavily *against* this kind of "tax reform." The federal income tax should be replaced by a *flat tax,* not a consumption tax, unless people making IRA withdrawals get a *rebate.* Considering that the population is aging rapidly, and in 20 years there are going to be a LOT of "senior citizens," this seems to be a particularly bone-headed plan.

166 posted on 02/08/2003 7:59:13 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
What would be considered "consumption?" Obviously buying items at the shopping mall - but what about paying for college tuition? Buying medical insurance? Paying a doctor bill?

College Tuition is an investment and NOT taxed! The others you mentioned are items YOU counsume and would thus BE taxed.

167 posted on 02/08/2003 8:00:56 PM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
Good post.
168 posted on 02/08/2003 8:02:12 PM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Considering that the population is aging rapidly, and in 20 years there are going to be a LOT of "senior citizens,"

And a great many of them are FAR more concerned about the country that will be left behind for their children and grandchildren than their own self interest! A GREAT many!

169 posted on 02/08/2003 8:04:56 PM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: dixie sass
Did we read the same story?

Yes, but the title on the thread now (White House Floats Idea of Dropping Income Tax (altogether)) is different from what it was when I initially responded a couple of hours ago (White House Floats Idea of Dropping Income Tax Overhaul).
170 posted on 02/08/2003 8:04:56 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
College Tuition is an investment and NOT taxed! The others you mentioned are items YOU counsume and would thus BE taxed.How is paying college tuition "an investment?" There is a service available (class at College X) and you pay for it. After you pay, you get to "consume" the service.

Taxing people for seeing the doctor or going to a hospital is just fundamentally evil - *worse* than the system we have now.

171 posted on 02/08/2003 8:06:04 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: templar
know where I can find the black market? There's a hot one burning in NYC for cigarettes right now!
172 posted on 02/08/2003 8:07:49 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Poleax the IRS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
How do you pay for a Dr.'s visit now?

I'll bet it is with dollars from which a MINIMUM of 47% has been confiscated before YOU ever see it!

173 posted on 02/08/2003 8:09:02 PM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
" I truly don't understand why I have to come up with another chunk to pay an accountant to figure out my taxes."

Welcome to my nightmare. LOL!
174 posted on 02/08/2003 8:10:48 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Poleax the IRS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
And a great many of them are FAR more concerned about the country that will be left behind for their children and grandchildren than their own self interest! A GREAT many!

Everyone fundamentally works for their own self-interest, and there isn't anything wrong with that.

At bottom, when you tax consumption, you get less consumption. (This is another issue than the one of cheating.) Personally, I think less consumption has some good moral points to it - it's probably better if a man grows the wood, cuts it down, carves the table, and uses it in his own home, rather than buying one. But in reality slowdowns in consumption can *kill* an economy, especially at the present time.

We saw this with the "luxury tax" on yachts & expensive cars. As soon as the tax was lifted, sales shot up. When states have "no sales tax" days, spending surges.

So people decide to cut back on luxuries. Now you're left with the necessities - food, medicine, diapers, doctor visits, immunizations, hospitalizations. You really want to put a *consumption tax* on these things?

175 posted on 02/08/2003 8:10:52 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
dude, don't DO that without giving warning... only so many pairs of pants left, y'know?
176 posted on 02/08/2003 8:11:10 PM PST by demosthenes the elder (crush your enemy, see him driven before you, and hear the lamentation of his women...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
Instead, all taxes should be collected by the states, or even by the counties and cities as they do in Virginia. Then, what the states don't need, they can send to the US government.

We already did that. It was called the Coonfederation of States and failed. We replaced it with the US Constitution.

177 posted on 02/08/2003 8:13:10 PM PST by and the horse you rode in on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
The federal government wants to micromanage everything,

If we return to having Senators apointed by State Governments to represent the States instead of the citizens, all that crap can be stopped. The trouble is the states, as states, have no representation.

178 posted on 02/08/2003 8:15:56 PM PST by and the horse you rode in on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
A 17% consumption tax is A TAX REDUCTION!! over what we have now!

And if it encourages savings, as savings grow, it will encourage investment. If that happens, this economy will be immune to China's long term plans of economic piracy. It will go the way of the Soviet Union.
179 posted on 02/08/2003 8:16:18 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Poleax the IRS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: demosthenes the elder
dude, don't DO that without giving warning... only so many pairs of pants left, y'know?

LOL! Consider me properly rebuked!

I'll TRY to do better next time!

180 posted on 02/08/2003 8:17:48 PM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson