An excellent idea. I'm not 100% certain how the government would define an Islamic country, but I pretty much take the position of Justice Holmes on pornography - I know it when I see it.
To: white trash redneck
Woo, how bold of Stanley Crouch! Particularly that line about followers of Islam can *seem* to be so civilized...
2 posted on
02/03/2003 6:59:20 AM PST by
Mamzelle
To: white trash redneck
props !!!!
3 posted on
02/03/2003 7:02:58 AM PST by
dennisw
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: white trash redneck
Ummm ... almost. I would admit
non-Moslems coming from Moslem countries. One of the fun features of Islamic government is
dhimmitude, a system of oppression of Christians and Jews that is even more malevolent that apartheid.
By the same token, I would not admit Moslems coming from non-Moslem countries (e.g. Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, coming from England).
4 posted on
02/03/2003 7:07:42 AM PST by
DonQ
To: white trash redneck
Way to go Stanley.
I agree.
To: white trash redneck
"I'm not even talking about Islam; I'm talking about a problem"
This is the crux of the whole matter.
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but so far, all terrorists have been Muslims.
Until Muslims start working toward a solution, they all will remain part of the problem.
6 posted on
02/03/2003 7:14:27 AM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
To: white trash redneck
My proposal is we not admit Muslims from anywhere except Turkey. Non muslims from muslim countries would be okay.
7 posted on
02/03/2003 7:15:37 AM PST by
weikel
(Your commie has no regard for human life not even his own)
To: white trash redneck
I also am opposed to anyone from any Islamic country coming into America for at least another decade. What, after 1400 years of jihad muslims are suddenly going to be civilized in another decade or so? How about NEVER allowing the b******s in? EVER.
To: white trash redneck
I've proposed the same to friends, and it has some positive features, chiefly: no detailed investigations of individuals - just a country wide ban.
Start by banning Saudi Arabians and Yemenis, since the 9/11 terrorists came from those countries. Ban Afghanistanis and Pakistanis too, and Egyptians. No one from Iran, the Phillipines, or Indonesia, since their jihadi cults have made the news. No one tanned males from France or England. No young male Americans allowed back in after visiting Muslim countries, unless on active duty in the military.
To: white trash redneck
I can scarcely believe Crouch wrote something this xenophobic. We can't just assume all Muslims are dangerous. At the very least, our ability to do business with such vital countries as India, Malaysia, and Indonesia, not to mention the Mid East countries, would be destroyed. We just can't do something like this, nor should we.
10 posted on
02/03/2003 7:53:30 AM PST by
ArcLight
To: white trash redneck
but I pretty much take the position of Justice Holmes on pornography - I know it when I see it. Yeah. How can an open society tolerate a religion that doesn't tolerate the practice of other religions? I say it's an impossibility. We can only support a Mohammedan minority that is a substantial minority. Once the Mohammedan minority becomes sizeable, our society will become unstable.
To: white trash redneck
I'm not 100% certain how the government would define an Islamic country, but I pretty much take the position of Justice Holmes on pornography - I know it when I see it.So do the Taliban. Women show a little ankle, and whack!
By analogy, if we get a whiff of Islam - no entry!
To: white trash redneck
Bump!
They all hate America but they never seem to turn away from the almighty dollar. Nor does their hatred from America and her people ever stop them from wanting to come here.
I wonder how long it will be before the moslems decide to petition the US government to allow them to practice Shariah law over their own people, such as they have tried to do in other countries like Thailand.
JUST SAY NO!
To: white trash redneck
We should include the French too.
This thread should make it clear why. I suggested at post #218 that memorization of the entire thread ought to be a requirement for admittance of any Frenchman to the U.S.
But perhaps I'm being too lenient.
26 posted on
02/03/2003 10:37:29 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Democrat - the abortion party!)
To: white trash redneck
Being France is so peaceful and wants to obstruct us at every turn, can't that nation back up their own words by accepting all these immigrants in croissant-torn France?
I say give them all to the French and secondarily to the Germans for at least the next 20 years.
I can just imagine the big hole that would cause France and Germany to become. I mean the "bigger" holes....
27 posted on
02/03/2003 10:44:41 AM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: white trash redneck
This is a very dumb argument. Just because you are from an Arabian country doesn't necessarily make you a terrorist.
The CIA Factbook says 280 million people live in America and of all the ethnic groups that are not White, Hispanic, Black, Indian or Asian; 4% are others.
Does that mean there are probably 11 million Arabs in this country willing to commit all sorts of heineous acts? They don't, which testifies that most if not all, people who immigrate to United States know it is the best country in the world to live in and they all should be welcomed with open arms.
33 posted on
02/03/2003 12:27:48 PM PST by
John123
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson