Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biology Professor Refuses to Recommend Students Who Don't Believe in Evolution
Texas Tech ^ | January 29, 2003 | Michael Dini

Posted on 01/30/2003 9:33:28 AM PST by matthew_the_brain

Letters of Recommendation

Before you ask me to write you a letter of recommendation for graduate or professional school in the biomedical sciences, there are several criteria that must be met. The request for a letter is best made by making an appointment to discuss the matter with me after considering these three criteria:

Criterion 1

You should have earned an "A" from me in at least one semester that you were taught by me.

Criterion 2

I should know you fairly well. Merely earning an "A" in a lower-division class that enrolls 500 students does not guarantee that I know you. In such a situation, all I would be able to provide is a very generic letter that would not be of much help in getting you into the school of your choice. You should allow me to become better acquainted with you. This can be done in several ways:

1) by meeting with me regularly during my office hours to discuss biological questions. 2) by enrolling in an Honors’ section taught by me. 3) by enrolling in my section of BIOL 4301 and serving as an undergraduate TA (enrollment is by invitation only). 4) by serving as the chairman or secretary of the Biology Advisory Committee.

Criterion 3

If you set up an appointment to discuss the writing of a letter of recommendation, I will ask you: "How do you think the human species originated?" If you cannot truthfully and forthrightly affirm a scientific answer to this question, then you should not seek my recommendation for admittance to further education in the biomedical sciences.

Why do I ask this question? Let’s consider the situation of one wishing to enter medical school. Whereas medicine is historically rooted first in the practice of magic and later in religion, modern medicine is an endeavor that springs from the sciences, biology first among these. The central, unifying principle of biology is the theory of evolution, which includes both micro- and macro-evolution, and which extends to ALL species. How can someone who does not accept the most important theory in biology expect to properly practice in a field that is so heavily based on biology? It is hard to imagine how this can be so, but it is easy to imagine how physicians who ignore or neglect the Darwinian aspects of medicine or the evolutionary origin of humans can make bad clinical decisions. The current crisis in antibiotic resistance is the result of such decisions. For others, please read the citations below.

Good medicine, like good biology, is based on the collection and evaluation of physical evidence. So much physical evidence supports the evolution of humans from non-human ancestors that one can validly refer to the "fact" of human evolution, even if all of the details are not yet known. One can deny this evidence only at the risk of calling into question one’s understanding of science and of the method of science. Such an individual has committed malpractice regarding the method of science, for good scientists would never throw out data that do not conform to their expectations or beliefs. This is the situation of those who deny the evolution of humans; such a one is throwing out information because it seems to contradict his/her cherished beliefs. Can a physician ignore data that s/he does not like and remain a physician for long? No. If modern medicine is based on the method of science, then how can someone who denies the theory of evolution -- the very pinnacle of modern biological science -- ask to be recommended into a scientific profession by a professional scientist?

If you still want to make an appointment, you can do so in person during office hours (M-Th, 3:30-4:00), or by phoning my office at 742-2729, or by e-mailing me at michael.dini@ttacs.ttu.edu

Citations

Ewald, P.W. 1993. Evolution of infectious disease. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 298.

Ewald, P.W. 1993. The evolution of virulence. Scientific American 268:86-98.

Morgan, E. 1990. The scars of evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 196.

Myers, J.H. and L.E. Rothman. 1995. Virulence and transmission of infectious diseases in humans and insects: evolutionary and demographic patterns. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10(5):194-198.

Nesse, R.M. and G.C. Williams. 1994. Why we get sick. Times Books, New York, pp. 291.

_____1997. Evolutionary biology in the medical curriculum -- what every physician should know. BioScience 47(10):664-666.

Rose, Michael. 1998. Darwin's Spectre. Princeton University Press, Princteon, NJ. pp. 233.

Seachrist, L. 1996. Only the strong survive: the evolution of a tumor favors the meanest, most aggressive cells. Science News 49:216-217.

Stearns, S.C. (ed.) 1999. Evolution in Health and Disease. Oxford University Press. pp. 328.

Trevathan, W.R., Smith, E.O. and J.J. McKenna (eds.). 1999. Evolutionary Medicine. Oxford University Press. pp. 480.

Williams, G.C. and R.M. Nesse. 1991. The dawn of Darwinian medicine. Quarterly Review of Biology 66:1-22.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters
KEYWORDS: academialist; christianlist; christianpersecutio; evolution; intelligentdesign; medianews; presstitutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-367 next last
To: ChemistCat
When our ancestors were ready for an Adam and an Eve to appear among them, that pair were endowed with human reason, naturally AND by divine power, because there really is no difference.

Exactly so.

As I have said on many prior evolution threads, I am a Jew who believes that God created the heavens and the earth. I believe God did so by creating the basic forces of nature and setting them to work, knowing that they would be sufficient to accomplish the Divine plan. Darwinian theory doesn't require God, but nor does it exclude Him.

141 posted on 01/30/2003 11:40:44 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
Learning the Kreb's Cycle depends in no way on what you think about evolution.

You left out the hexose monophosphate shunt. :)

I wonder what new chemical pathways they've found in those funky biota that hang out near the deep sea vents/chimneys.

142 posted on 01/30/2003 11:42:46 AM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Are zebras funny? We'll have to check w/ the prof.
143 posted on 01/30/2003 11:43:44 AM PST by 70times7 (Danger Will Robinson! Bacteria approaching!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: sleepy_hollow
So, what were you saying again about me being a liar? You must really have alot invested in this theory of yours to be so blinded by it.

Death throes. They know it's over. They are looking for a theory to replace darwinism but, until one comes along, it's either that or creation. Acknowledging a Creator, as our founding fathers did, is beneath their dignity so darwinism is defended against reason.

144 posted on 01/30/2003 11:45:17 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
So what medical procedure, or clinical practice depends on a belief in the "Theory of Evolution"? I think everyone forgot about this again.

DK
145 posted on 01/30/2003 11:46:34 AM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
(I don't believe in "G-d" either, and I'm a pastor!)

There's a new nightclub opening on the river that could use a good comedian.

146 posted on 01/30/2003 11:47:16 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: John H K
I'd crash the FR server if I posted a list of every transitional fossil ever found.

IOW, there are none.

147 posted on 01/30/2003 11:48:10 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Faith, the belief in something that cannot be proven by scientific logic or test. And as theories cannot be definitely proven, it requires faith to believe in them.

148 posted on 01/30/2003 11:48:37 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
http://www.bact.wisc.edu/microtextbook/ControlGrowth/resistance.html

The basis of bacterial resistance to antibiotics

Inherent (Natural) Resistance Bacteria may be inherently resistant to an antibiotic. For example, a streptomycete has some gene that is responsible for resistance to its own antibiotic; or a Gram-negative bacterium has an outer membrane that establishes a permeability barrier against the antibiotic; or an organism lacks a transport system for the antibiotic; or it lacks the target or reaction that is hit by the antibiotic.

Acquired Resistance Bacteria can develop resistance to antibiotics, e.g. bacterial populations previously-sensitive to antibiotics become resistant. This type of resistance results from changes in the bacterial genome. Acquired resistance is driven by two genetic processes in bacteria: (1) mutation and selection (sometimes referred to as vertical evolution); (2) exchange of genes between strains and species (sometimes called horizontal evolution).

Vertical evolution is strictly a matter of Darwinian evolution driven by principles of natural selection: a spontaneous mutation in the bacterial chromosome imparts resistance to a member of the bacterial population. In the selective environment of the antibiotic, the wild type (non mutants) are killed and the resistant mutant is allowed to grow and flourish. The mutation rate for most bacterial genes is approximately 10-8. This means that if a bacterial population doubles from 108 cells to 2 x 108 cells, there is likely to be a mutant present for any given gene. Since bacteria grow to reach population densities far in excess of 109 cells, such a mutant could develop from a single generation during 15 minutes of growth.

Horizontal evolution is the acquisition of genes for resistance from another organism. For example, a streptomycete has a gene for resistance to streptomycin (its own antibiotic), but somehow that gene escapes and gets into E. coli or Shigella. Or, more likely, Some bacterium develops genetic resistance through the process of mutation and selection and then donates these genes to some other bacterium through one of several processes for genetic exchange that exist in bacteria.

Bacteria are able to exchange genes in nature by three processes: conjugation, transduction and transformation. Conjugation involves cell-to-cell contact as DNA crosses a sex pilus from donor to recipient. During transduction, a virus transfers the genes between mating bacteria. In transformation, DNA is acquired directly from the environment, having been released from another cell. Genetic recombination can follow the transfer of DNA from one cell to another leading to the emergence of a new genotype (recombinant). It is common for DNA to be transferred as plasmids between mating bacteria. Since bacteria usually develop their genes for drug resistance on plasmids (called resistance transfer factors, or RTFs), they are able to spread drug resistance to other strains and species during genetic exchange processes.

The combined effects of fast growth rates, high concentrations of cells, genetic processes of mutation and selection, and the ability to exchange genes, account for the extraordinary rates of adaptation and evolution that can be observed in the bacteria. For these reasons bacterial adaptation (resistance) to the antibiotic environment seems to take place very rapidly in evolutionary time: bacteria evolve fast!

149 posted on 01/30/2003 11:49:03 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
That's just it. Evolution cannot be proven any more than the existance of God can. What can be shown are the inconsistencies in evolution.
150 posted on 01/30/2003 11:50:33 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
And as theories cannot be definitely proven, it requires faith to believe in them.

Proof is no part of science. I can't provide proof the sun will rise tomorrw, but I have every confidence it will, and I would argue it trivializes faith to claim that it requires faith to say so.

151 posted on 01/30/2003 11:53:07 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Evolution cannot be proven any more than the existance of God can.

No theory in science can be 'proven'. To be scientific, however, there must be a means by which a theory can be disproven. Is there a means of disproving the existence of 'God'?

What can be shown are the inconsistencies in evolution.

And the same can be said of God, for certain definitions of God.
152 posted on 01/30/2003 11:53:46 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
"Faith" is an accurate term to describe your belief that the earth will rotate in such a way that the sun is shining on the location where you are located at a certain time tomorrow, however this implies a different definition of 'faith' than that used when speaking of religious belief. Many creationists like to use the word 'faith' to create a false equivocation by ignoring the fact that two different definitions are at work.
153 posted on 01/30/2003 11:55:30 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Posted by f.Christian to Jeff Chandler

jc... (( original ))

"They have no business encouraging homosexuality, or forcing its acceptance upon students or faculty. The schools should teach the kids to behave like civilized people, that every individual should be treated with respect. Instead, they choose to indoctrinate them in leftist ideology. The entire school should be a safe zone for everyone. The whole idea of special protection for any one group is unAmerican."

4 posted on 01/26/2003 3:07 PM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)

fC... (( revision ))

They have no business encouraging homosexuality (( evolutuion // atheism // . . . abortion // link )) **, or forcing its acceptance upon students or faculty. The schools should teach the kids to behave (( think )) ** like civilized people, that every individual should be treated with respect. Instead, they choose to indoctrinate them in (( hard core )) ** leftist ideology (PC // BIAS )) ** . The entire school should be a safe zone (( NO brainwashing )) ** for everyone. The whole idea (( tyranny )) ** of special protection (( MONOPOLY )) ** for any one group (( priveledges )) ** is . . . unAmerican (( original thread )) - - - (( forced RELIGION establishment // vetting // witch hunts // purges // elites )) ** .

.. .. .. **...my additions !

154 posted on 01/30/2003 11:56:55 AM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
But who would explain the jokes?
155 posted on 01/30/2003 12:01:33 PM PST by BibChr (Jesus -- not our feelings -- is the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Thanks for the good example of hard science meets evolution. I really do appreciate it.

>>The combined effects of fast growth rates, high concentrations of cells, genetic processes of mutation and selection, and the ability to exchange genes, account for the extraordinary rates of adaptation and evolution that can be observed in the bacteria. For these reasons bacterial adaptation (resistance) to the antibiotic environment seems to take place very rapidly in evolutionary time: bacteria evolve fast!<<

With low populations of animals, no real exchange of genes, complex systems that fail with mutation generally and slow growth rates...how high up the biology orders of complex organisms does the clearly this evolutionary mechanism go? Does sexual reproduction limit this even further ie the requirement that two of the same mutants must find each other or the new mutation is lost?

They are serious questions. Now I won't dispute the requirement, for a bacteriologist.

DK

156 posted on 01/30/2003 12:09:18 PM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dark Knight
Healthy normal people and children from good homes and families have an immunity to this nonsense // disease (( liberalism // evolution )) but there seems to be a permanent growing underclass dependent on the govt and their // our overlords who are feeding on this diet // formula and living and preying on the rest of us!
157 posted on 01/30/2003 12:10:33 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
I wouldn't ask this guy for a recommendation either. Anyone that provides citations in an instructional letter to undergraduates is way too full of himself.

If you read between the lines, I think you can restate the criteria:

Criterion 1: I give out so many As that you must be dumber than dirt to get a B or lower.

Criterion 2: If you are not kissing up to me, I won't give you a letter of recommendation. Kissing up to me can be accomplished by:
1) Signing up for my Honors class (because the enrollment is so low that it might get cancelled). You will really enjoy this class as I determine the topic of the day and then dazzle you with my brilliance as I pontificate on my current research or air my latest grievance.
2) Working as a TA so that I can dedicate more time to my research without being bothered by students. This research is vital to fill up journals with important sounding titles read by literally dozens of people worldwide.
3) Signing up for the Biology Advisory Committee. The department stuck me with responsibility for this and I need some warm bodies to fill the positions.
4) Making an appointment to meet me during my office hours. Obviously, since I have only 2 hours of office hours a week, I don't want to be bothered by students, so get a clue. If for some reason, you don't understand this, make an appointment to meet with me during my office hours. An appointment is necessary not because I meet with so many students but because I am never in my office during my office hours.

Criterion 3: Because I did such a poor job of convincing you in class of the truth of evolution, I will resort to intimidation.
158 posted on 01/30/2003 12:13:30 PM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
bacteria evolve fast!

Yes, I had all this in undergrad and med school.

However, expression of latent genes and or gene swapping IS NOT EVOLUTION!

Its simply expression of pre-existing DNA code.

159 posted on 01/30/2003 12:17:46 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Not responsive.
160 posted on 01/30/2003 12:23:48 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (The world is a solemn place, with room for tennis. - John Berryman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson