Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protein 'makes cancer cells self-destruct'
BBC News ^ | 25 January, 2003 | BBC staff

Posted on 01/25/2003 6:42:29 AM PST by PatrickHenry

A protein has been discovered which causes cancer cells to self-destruct.

US researchers have discovered it destroys up to 70% of cancer cells.

It regulates the production of a key enzyme involved in the generation of blood vessels which feed cancer cells' growth.

The enzyme is Cox-2, which is already known to play a role in causing arthritis.

n cancer cells, it is thought to disrupt the strict timetable involved in cell production, causing proteins to be made too early or too late.

The normal cycle of cell replication and division is tightly controlled. A copy of DNA called RNA is made and that is translated into proteins - which have to be made at exactly the right time for the process to create healthy cells.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) controls the timings in cell production.

Cell survival

Researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis looked at how a protein CUGBP2 interacted with the mRNA for Cox-2 in eight types of human cancer cells.

In all eight, levels of CUGBP2 were very low, suggesting the development of cancer "turns down" the gene responsible for its production, meaning levels of the protein falls and the cancer can flourish.

But when the protein was attached to the mRNA for the Cox-2 enzyme, cancer cells could no longer make Cox-2, and they died, suggesting it plays a key role in tumour cell survival or death.

Professor Brian Dieckgraefe, co-author of the research, said: "CUGBP2 may be one type of master switch used by the cell to control other key proteins.

"Proteins like Cox-2 need to be tightly regulated to avoid uncontrolled growth. That may be why CUGBP2 levels were significantly lower in every single tumour we studied."

Professor Shrikant Anant, who also worked on the study, said: "When CUGBP2 is introduced, there are a number of molecular derangements that take place in the cancer cell that make it susceptible to death.

"In the future, it may be possible to use this protein as a means of killing tumour cells without harming normal cells because normal cells already produce significant amounts of the protein."

'A step forward'

More research is underway to see if the effect seen in cancer cells is also seen in tumours. Human testing may be possible in a few years, the researchers said.

The believe CUGBP2 may help existing therapies work better.

Professor Dieckgraefe said: "Most therapeutic tools we currently use for cancer act by triggering cells to self-destruct.

"So it's entirely possible that this might become a synergistic addition to existing therapies. By augmenting existing chemotherapy with CUGBP2, we might be able to make traditional therapies more effective."

Dr Elaine Vickers, information officer for Cancer Research UK, said: "There has been much interest recently in the molecule Cox-2 because it is found in high levels in some cancers.

"A number of clinical trials are ongoing in the UK investigating the effectiveness of drugs that block Cox-2 in bowel cancer.

"This discovery is a step forward in our understanding of how Cox-2 is controlled.

"However, it will be many years before we know whether targeting CUGBP2 could be important in the treatment of cancer."

The research is published in the journal Molecular Cell.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; crevolist; dna; evolution; health; medicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
If this was posted before, I searched on "cancer" and "protein" but somehow missed it.
1 posted on 01/25/2003 6:42:29 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
We're gonna live forever! Ping.

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be added (or dropped), let me know via freepmail.]

2 posted on 01/25/2003 6:43:50 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Preserve the purity of your precious bodily fluids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
We're gonna live forever!

Now you've done it! Think how many people depend in their retirement planning upon the idea that "Hey! I'm not going to live forever, after all! I just need to plan for 85 or so at the outside."

Better keep working a few decades longer there, pal!

3 posted on 01/25/2003 6:54:03 AM PST by VadeRetro (Even Bill Gates is nervous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Not a problem. When I'm 85, I'll probably die of a Viagra overdose.
4 posted on 01/25/2003 6:55:55 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Preserve the purity of your precious bodily fluids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
My Dad's dream obituary was "Age 115, shot by a jealous husband."
5 posted on 01/25/2003 7:03:37 AM PST by VadeRetro (Alas! He didn't keep in that good a shape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
When I'm 85, I'll probably die of a Viagra overdose.

A toast to the "SPIRIT of PATRICK"! To saving your essense for one final blast!

6 posted on 01/25/2003 7:15:25 AM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
If it's government-sponsored research it will always need more study. No cure will ever be found. Why? Because, if they found a cure the gravy-train would stop.

So a cure will never be found. Success will always be just around the corner. And to reach it will require--you guessed it--more funding.

If the search for a polio vaccine were a government effort, the iron lung would still be with us.

7 posted on 01/25/2003 7:24:45 AM PST by Anarchist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
I was hoping to die, at 85, from being shot by a jealous husband.
8 posted on 01/25/2003 8:12:59 AM PST by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Anarchist
So a cure will never be found. Success will always be just around the corner

It was in "The Music Man" that Prof Hill admitted that he coul not sell the steam powered automobile anymore because someone actually invented one.

I share your attitude about the government funding research, but there are profit making institutions that are competing with each other and someone will come through. (You don't actually believe General Motors would hold back with a 100 mile per gallon engine?)

9 posted on 01/25/2003 8:13:58 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
I was hoping to die, at 85, from being shot by a jealous husband.

Make that a 25 year old jealous husband.

(Who's got two kids and just found out from the doctor that he's sterile!)

10 posted on 01/25/2003 8:32:46 AM PST by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I can't help but wonder what role, if any, "creation science" is playing in this cancer research.
11 posted on 01/25/2003 9:03:31 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Preserve the purity of your precious bodily fluids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The enzyme is Cox-2, which is already known to play a role in causing arthritis

Celebrex, Bextra, and Vioxx are the newest prescription anti-inflammatory "wonder drugs," and constitute one of the largest groups of most-prescribed medicines now.

Since these are specifically Cox-2 inhibitors, one must wonder if they are going to lead to multiple cases of cancer down the road.

12 posted on 01/25/2003 9:04:03 AM PST by Polycarp (Forgive my typos...I don't have the energy to correct them today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Celebrex, Bextra, and Vioxx are the newest prescription anti-inflammatory "wonder drugs," and constitute one of the largest groups of most-prescribed medicines now. Since these are specifically Cox-2 inhibitors, one must wonder if they are going to lead to multiple cases of cancer down the road.

The article says: "But when the protein was attached to the mRNA for the Cox-2 enzyme, cancer cells could no longer make Cox-2, and they died, suggesting it plays a key role in tumour cell survival or death. So I don't think a Cox-2 inhibitor is a problem. But this stuff is not my field, so I'm just going along for the ride on this thread.

13 posted on 01/25/2003 9:14:20 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Preserve the purity of your precious bodily fluids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I can't help but wonder what role, if any, "creation science" is playing in this cancer research.

CS is standing by saying, "If this doesn't work, it's proof that man is constantly overreaching himself in meddling with creation. If it does work, it's proof of intelligent design."

14 posted on 01/25/2003 9:17:10 AM PST by VadeRetro ("Real science" doesn't have to work to be always right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Hmmm...I think you're right, I read it wrong:

There has been much interest recently in the molecule Cox-2 because it is found in high levels in some cancers.

"A number of clinical trials are ongoing in the UK investigating the effectiveness of drugs that block Cox-2 in bowel cancer.

15 posted on 01/25/2003 9:21:53 AM PST by Polycarp (Forgive my typos...I don't have the energy to correct them today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Celebrex, Bextra, and Vioxx are the newest prescription anti-inflammatory "wonder drugs," and constitute one of the largest groups of most-prescribed medicines now.

Since these are specifically Cox-2 inhibitors, one must wonder if they are going to lead to multiple cases of cancer down the road.

My first thought.

16 posted on 01/25/2003 9:30:21 AM PST by null and void (Forgive us our typos as we forgive those who typo against us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
CS is standing by saying ...

I know someone who could do better than that. He'll probably claim that this is still more "proof" that evolution is false.

17 posted on 01/25/2003 9:53:57 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Preserve the purity of your precious bodily fluids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Nowhere else but on FR do I read pornography. And in the most unexpected places.
18 posted on 01/25/2003 10:05:23 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
bump .....
19 posted on 01/25/2003 10:16:11 AM PST by Centurion2000 (The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
We're gonna live forever! Ping.

When did you become a faithful Christian?

20 posted on 01/25/2003 11:06:15 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson