Skip to comments.
MSNBC Poll-Do the allegations against Ritter damage his credibility as a commentator on Iraq?
MSNBC ^
| January 22, 2003
| None
Posted on 01/22/2003 3:45:41 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
Results so far
3 responses
Yes 67%
No 33%
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freep; poll; ritter; tunnel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: South40
LOL. That's too good. It can't be for real can it?
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Now 85% say his creepy nature has impacted his credibility. He was so flip floppy and out of it to begin with-what does it matter, really?
22
posted on
01/22/2003 3:58:04 PM PST
by
Republic
To: Larry Lucido
"You can't destroy credibility if you don't have any to start with." I thought that too, but then I translated the question into liberalese and it works that way.
To: SwinneySwitch
"AndWithYou" Episcopalian?
To: PeaceBeWithYou; doug from upland
Pity none of the networks asked this question about Clinton and the Broaddrick rape charge.
To: PeaceBeWithYou
DAY of SUPPORT....FLY your flags (US, a British one, Hungarian, Australian and Japanese one, too if you have them)....and put up your BUSH/CHENEY signs, (and the BIG W's on your SUV's) for the STATE of the UNION next Tuesday, Jan 28th, if you support the President, our MILITARY and the United States of America.
PSST....pass it on.
26
posted on
01/22/2003 4:02:02 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
("You're either with us, or against us!")
To: PeaceBeWithYou
bttt
27
posted on
01/22/2003 4:03:34 PM PST
by
ellery
To: PeaceBeWithYou; JohnHuang2
Update Bump!
195 responses
Yes 90%
No 10%
Keep on FReeping, ping it around if you would, King.
To: Texas_Jarhead
I don't think so.
Not because it wouldn't be warranted.
But because the powers that be in Arkansas wouldn't allow it.
29
posted on
01/22/2003 4:11:29 PM PST
by
South40
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Ritter's preference for women is the same as Mohammed's.
30
posted on
01/22/2003 4:20:42 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
To: Maelstrom
It's an ad hominem attackNo, it's not. It's the truth that they tried to hide.
31
posted on
01/22/2003 4:24:02 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Fly your flag in support of President Bush's State of the Union Speech)
To: South40
Apparently not all Arkansans revere Clinton.
I drive I-30 through Hope, AR every couple of weeks. They recently put up big, new "Home of President William Jefferon Clinton" signs on I-30, and they are already riddled with bullet holes -- again!
32
posted on
01/22/2003 4:27:04 PM PST
by
TXnMA
((No Longer!!!))
To: PeaceBeWithYou
I said yes to make a point, but he had no credibilty to begin with. He gave that up when he flipped for no reason.
33
posted on
01/22/2003 4:28:31 PM PST
by
TankerKC
(That handle left of the steering column? It's a "turn signal".)
To: *FREEP!
34
posted on
01/22/2003 4:30:15 PM PST
by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: TXnMA
They recently put up big, new "Home of President William Jefferon Clinton" signs on I-30, and they are already riddled with bullet holes -- again!I believe Hillary visited Arkansas recently.
Could it be???
35
posted on
01/22/2003 4:34:09 PM PST
by
South40
To: PeaceBeWithYou
Done. 90% yes.
You'll notice he doesn't deny that he did the deed, although he does seem unclear on the concept as to what it means to have a case continued for dismissal. Not at all the same thing as being found not guilty. Not at all.
To: CobaltBlue
With 339 votes, it's 88 per cent YES and 12 per cent NO.
A question of technique for any who know ...
Many polls I freep can be voted on multiple times by deleting cookies and then reloading the page.
It doesn't work at this poll. I even delete all temporary or cached files, and when I load the page from a fresh browser window, it still presents me with the results, not a new opportunity to vote.
Anyone care to share a work-around?
To: PeaceBeWithYou
|
|
|
|
Do the allegations against Scott Ritter damage his credibility as a commentator on Iraq? * 353 responses |
|
Yes 88% |
|
No 12% |
|
To: Larry Lucido
"You can't destroy credibility if you don't have any to start with."
. . .good point. . .
39
posted on
01/22/2003 4:44:50 PM PST
by
cricket
To: cricket
Ah, but since "No credibility to begin with" wasn't an option....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson