Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court ordered Scott Ritter to attend counseling for sex offenders
WTEN.com (Albany, NY) ^ | January 20, 2002

Posted on 01/20/2003 3:25:45 PM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-246 next last
To: Miss Marple
You got that right!
41 posted on 01/20/2003 4:36:55 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: woofie
What a bunch of freaks liberals defending a pig like Ritter!
42 posted on 01/20/2003 4:37:48 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: woofie
"Feeding them all kinds of stuff" really means e-mailing them (cutting and pasting) Pitt's very own words. He did it to himself. I told him a year ago that he should have taken back his statement that Reagan sent the bombs to the Middle East through Ollie North that killed our Marines in Beirut. He would not take it back.

He posts on all the Bush-hating sites. I suspect that CNN decided his objectivity would be in question. They made the decision using Pitt's words. I invented nothing. Can you smear someone with their own words? If he wants to be taken seriously as a writer rather than a RAT hack, perhaps he should dump the 4-letter words and hatred of Bush and Reagan. His words are a paper trail. I express intense hatred of Bill and Hillary, but I never expect to be on CNN. My business is protecting buildings from terrorist bastards, not being a for profit political writer.

I'll say it again. If he wanted to be on my show, I would do a serious interview and let him get out his info. I would, of course, challenge him on it. The rules would be no attacks on Clinton or Bush, no using the word Chimp or Sinkmaster, etc. I wouldn't even call Hillary Satan's Daughter. I can refrain from that for an hour.

43 posted on 01/20/2003 4:41:21 PM PST by doug from upland (May the Clintons live their remaining days in orange jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
1. Ritter didn't KNOW that it was a cop he was talking to. Your attempt to dismiss this as inconsequential is ridiculous. I ask again, would you think this was a minor thing if YOUR daughter were lured into watching a man over twice her age masterbate? Apparently so, according to your statements.

2. The Clintons have far more influence in Albany, New York than do the Iraqis. I am willing to entertain the thought that Saddam is involved. Why do you dismiss Hillary so cavalierly? I have offered theories, you do nothing but mock my ideas.

3. Why are MY theories to be discounted, when your anthrax theories are posted over and over again? YOU have no PROOF that you are right. You are simply deducing a conclusion based on information you have gathered. I am doing the same.

Why are you so interested in protecting Hillary?

44 posted on 01/20/2003 4:42:31 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Take a hike. Most of history, girls were already hooked-up by 16. It's not pedophilia.

It wasn't even a crime -- except in our New World Order of "virtual" crime. There was NO victim. It was all playacting.

45 posted on 01/20/2003 4:46:20 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; TLBSHOW
This is starting to look like a carnival...It really is funny at some level(also tragic and sad) and a bit frightening that these lunatics are running rapant...
46 posted on 01/20/2003 4:47:01 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
The playbook of Barney Frank is only a subset of Hillary's.
47 posted on 01/20/2003 4:48:09 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
to say nothing of the question: did he get caught the first time he undertook such entertainment for himself? or did he get caught the second time, or the fifth, or the twentieth?

dep

48 posted on 01/20/2003 4:54:51 PM PST by dep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: woofie
bttt
49 posted on 01/20/2003 4:56:25 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Female ADA, connected, doesn't tell her boss, she was supposed to, didn't -- dominating female type. Local media has story done up doesn't play it. Liberal area.

Likelyhood of Hillary involvement? I'd guess higher than middlin'.

50 posted on 01/20/2003 4:58:38 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
"... let's face it -- not particularly earthshaking sex offense (the guy offered to show his wiener to a 16-year old temptress in an internet chat room).

You are speaking from experience re: this not being earthshaking?

Any man who has to troll chatrooms to meet some underage girl, arrange to meet her, and then, in YOUR vernacular, "show her his wiener", is one sick pervert. Your defense of him makes me wonder if you have personal experience with this type of behavior.

51 posted on 01/20/2003 4:59:02 PM PST by justshe (Only YOU can stop Freepathons! A MONTHLY DONATION is the CURE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
In pratical context, what Ritter did he did, it is no small thing and reflects very poorly on him. Yet it wasn't a crime! At least a "crime" by decent standards, although it is become a crime in our police-state times.
52 posted on 01/20/2003 5:01:34 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
If Ritter did this three times with the Decoy Cop, how many times did he do it with real kids?

I don't want to think about it.
53 posted on 01/20/2003 5:03:12 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Happy people live longer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
1. Ritter didn't KNOW that it was a cop he was talking to. Your attempt to dismiss this as inconsequential is ridiculous. I ask again, would you think this was a minor thing if YOUR daughter were lured into watching a man over twice her age masterbate? Apparently so, according to your statements.

If I had a 16 year-old daughter and she went onto an internet chat room and engaged in some dirty talk and lured a middle-age man into meeting her to put on a sexual performance I would (a) be quite p*ssed at both of them, (b) very possibly call the cops on the guy and (c) have enough sense of proportion not to be outraged if said individual, a first-time offender and a professional person, got away with a plea bargain and just had to do some counseling after being subjected to the shame of having his name and picture plastered on local TV. The real world is full of horney people trying to get in each others' pants. It's not the crime of the century if some middle aged guy gets seduced by a highschool cheerleader and they dry hump in a Burger King. This stuff happens.

2. The Clintons have far more influence in Albany, New York than do the Iraqis. I am willing to entertain the thought that Saddam is involved. Why do you dismiss Hillary so cavalierly? I have offered theories, you do nothing but mock my ideas.

The whole notion that Hillary Clinton has been pulling Scott Ritter's strings for the last four years using sexual blackmail is utterly absurd on multiple levels. I wouldn't even know where to start. It's prima facie ridiculous.

3. Why are MY theories to be discounted, when your anthrax theories are posted over and over again? YOU have no PROOF that you are right. You are simply deducing a conclusion based on information you have gathered. I am doing the same.

Hey, I'm not stopping you from posting your theories.

Why are you so interested in protecting Hillary?

Really, Miss Marple, I've always admired your posts and find myself in agreement with the vast majority of them. But you are sounding like a paronoid here. I am no supporter of Hillary Clinton -- quite the opposite. I just don't think she's the hidden hand behind everything that happens in the universe -- or even in Albany.

54 posted on 01/20/2003 5:04:59 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Special Report quoted Scotty as denying it. What to believe?:

Not Scotty Scuddy Ritter Rooter for sure.

Former weapons inspector Scott Ritter has said that Saddam is not a threat
Scotts Movie Deal 2000

But before that he said: "Iraq today is not disarmed, and remains an ugly threat to its neighbors and to world peace."Testimony before the Senate 9/3/98

55 posted on 01/20/2003 5:09:47 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bvw
It wasn't even a crime -- except in our New World Order of "virtual" crime. There was NO victim. It was all playacting.

What a moronic, uninformed statement. It stopped being "playacting" when Ritter made arrangements and then physically entered the Burger King looking to hook up with his underage thrill toy. Sorry, Buster, maybe you and a few other morally-empty fools think that it is OK for 40-something guys to go trolling for underaged girls on the net, but a lot of US here don't. (And that goes for any Joe--not just famous or politically active Joes who troll.)

And, yeah the Monica's of the world and a few foolish tramps are willing--that still doesn't make it right. One doesn't have sex with underlings or take advantage of minors if one is morally sound. Contrary to what Bubba and others want you to believe, there are company/government policies and laws on the books for very good reasons. (You obviously don't agree with these policies or laws.) Just stay away from my nieces and my fellow FReeper's underage daughters...

56 posted on 01/20/2003 5:10:43 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
There was NO underage girl! It was an act. Ritter could in all legality divorce his wife and marry the woman cop who was at Burger King that night (or whatever time of day it was).
57 posted on 01/20/2003 5:14:01 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
If Ritter did this three times with the Decoy Cop, how many times did he do it with real kids?

Yup. That is why there are "sting operations" out there. To protect kids from perverts like Ritter--and some who are far worse. This is not "Minority Report." Ritter was out to take advantage of what he thought was a real live sex object. He knew it was illegal, yet he was willing to do it all the same. I hope he has learned his lesson. And I hope that law enforcement finds more of these sick, predatory creeps. Less chance of them hurting someone in the long run...

58 posted on 01/20/2003 5:15:36 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
So then, Ritter took it seriously when someone told him to, "Go . . . . yourself."

Well, he's certainly been trying to jerk us around.

59 posted on 01/20/2003 5:16:00 PM PST by MaeWest (...to say the very least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
You obviously have never raised a daughter, nor do you have a sense of decency. I personally would find it repellant if he had lured a 45 year old woman to watch him masturbate. It is a sick obsession, pure and simple.

Yes, this stuff happens. That is why it is ILLEGAL. We don't want MORE of it to happen!

There is quite possibly a connection between Clinton and Saddam. You do remember that Clinton did NOTHING about Iraq except talk for 8 years, don't you?

My theory may be a blind alley. HOWEVER, I am not discounting it simply because YOU say it is silly.

I daresay I may be righter about my theory than you are of yours. Time will tell.

60 posted on 01/20/2003 5:19:36 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson