Skip to comments.
Scott Ritter's Sex Chat Screen Names (help us out!)
FR ^
| 01.20.03
| Registered
Posted on 01/20/2003 12:20:27 PM PST by Registered
Here are just a few of Scott Ritter's Sex Chat names...
- BigBagdhaddy
- MWOMD (my weapon of mass destruction)
- ILOVEURAQ
- FreeInspections
- UnitemetoyourNation
- ILoveSaddamy
- PatriotMissile4U
- TurnURheadandKofi
- TeenAngelDaddy
Feel free to help out....
TOPICS: Editorial; Free Republic; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: busted; chat; kiddydiddler; majorcreep; ritter; scott; scumbag; sex; teens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-369 next last
To: Burkeman1
To: Registered
Spanky.
To: Registered
Not-So-Small-Pox
143
posted on
01/20/2003 1:30:50 PM PST
by
woofie
To: Registered
Saudi Masochist
Press Darling
Ritterally Insane
Aid-N-a-BED
144
posted on
01/20/2003 1:31:06 PM PST
by
new cruelty
(Read this tagline, then see the movie!)
To: TommyDale
HMmm- supporting the destruction of citizens who oppose the prevailing view or policies of an administration that you happen to agree with? Funny- Clinton used the IRS to harass political oppenents. Do you agree with that? I am not saying Ritter is innocent. For all I know the guy is a major perv. But I just find the circumstances very funny and if this was a Democratic President and Ritter was dogging him and this charge came up this site would be up in arms (oh- wait! Ritter did dog Clinton and was once a hero here.)
To: new cruelty
meccabaitor LOL! Or maybe MasturTraitor.
To: Registered
dumbass
elstupido
offalhinden
147
posted on
01/20/2003 1:33:24 PM PST
by
semaj
To: small voice in the wilderness
MasturTraitor, good one!
how about:
mecca_man-outta-u
148
posted on
01/20/2003 1:33:37 PM PST
by
new cruelty
(Read this tagline, then see the movie!)
To: Registered
ROTFLMAO
149
posted on
01/20/2003 1:34:31 PM PST
by
weikel
To: billhilly
To: Burkeman1
Read the other theads on this subject. While it sounds likely that this charged would be dismissed after 6 months that does not give him the right now to spew his sanctimonous rants to the masses via the news as if he is an expert.
To: Burkeman1
To: new cruelty
Wanna Patrol My Southern No Fly Zone?
(more of a line than a screen name)
To: Registered
UNSHAFT
UNCUM
154
posted on
01/20/2003 1:42:11 PM PST
by
Balata
(FR Rocks! :-))
To: alisasny
I have read the other threads. And I see zero evidence other than the fact that he was arrested and the case was adjourned without finding. That you dislike what he has to say is obvious (I have my doubts about him as well since he chose to speak before the phoney Iraqi "parliment" as if it were a real legislative body with real power) but that is not grounds for even an educated guess as to his guilt or innoncence in this case.
To: Byron_the_Aussie
Reg, wouldn't it be best to find out whether Ritter was convicted, before cranking up the smear campaign You're right..
we really should defend:
Scott "Saddam-ite, Ima U.N. lovin, Anti-USA, traitorous, Iraqi whore" Ritter
shouldn't we?
I don't think so.
156
posted on
01/20/2003 1:43:07 PM PST
by
Johnny Gage
(God Bless America, God Bless President George Bush, and God Bless our Military!)
To: billhilly
Really? The plot thickens.
To: Burkeman1
The way I see it is that Ritter is a major problem loudmouth who now sucks up to Saddam Hussein. It would be a natural move to silence him by leaking something THAT HE DID in order to shut him up. After all, this is national security here. I would detest something like this if it were Joe Average Citizen, who goes about his business. Ritter doen't deserve any consideration, because he is speaking against his country AND IN FAVOR OF IRAQ publicly.
Incidentally, I would feel the same about any of those "anti-war" demonstrators last weekend. Just another bunch of Hanoi Janes.
To: Johnny Gage
Everyone who disagrees with Bush and is charged as a child molestor is guilty.
To: Burkeman1
I guess he was doing research for his new book.....: )
I hear what your saying however his dismissal is not equal to innocence. So its probably true and since a first offense as I said the dismissal would make sense.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-369 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson