To: alisasny
I have read the other threads. And I see zero evidence other than the fact that he was arrested and the case was adjourned without finding. That you dislike what he has to say is obvious (I have my doubts about him as well since he chose to speak before the phoney Iraqi "parliment" as if it were a real legislative body with real power) but that is not grounds for even an educated guess as to his guilt or innoncence in this case.
To: Burkeman1
I guess he was doing research for his new book.....: )
I hear what your saying however his dismissal is not equal to innocence. So its probably true and since a first offense as I said the dismissal would make sense.
To: Burkeman1
You are trying too hard to not accept it. His silence on the matter is deafening. If I were innocent and this was alleged about me, I'd sing like a bird.
162 posted on
01/20/2003 1:45:38 PM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
To: Burkeman1
...that is not grounds for even an educated guess as to his guilt or innocence in this case....Right. And Ritter must have known this was going to come out, at the optimum time to suit his enemies.
This whole Ritter affair is anomaly piled upon anomaly, but some of our Freeper colleagues are so blinded by their hatred of him they're not even aware of being manipulated.
212 posted on
01/20/2003 3:24:20 PM PST by
Byron_the_Aussie
(The anti-Ritter crew : every used-car salesman's dream.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson