Pentagon WarlordDonald Rumsfeld's secret plan to defeat Saddam relies on special forces, a new high-tech weapon and a defense secretary involved in every detail
1 posted on
01/20/2003 1:00:00 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: All
2 posted on
01/20/2003 1:01:27 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
Wow. Talk about a "zot". :)
To: kattracks
Isn't that kind of like the device they used in the remake of Ocean's Eleven?
To: kattracks
And you wanted to buy a smart gun to use against the government in case of a coup? Yes it's the Ocean's Eleven CalTech toy. I tried to tell everyone this is why they were pushing smart gun technology.
To: kattracks
The "e-bomb" contains as much power as what the Hoover Dam generates in 24 hours - about 2 billion watts - and it can all be loaded onto long-range cruise missiles. Technically scrambled. Let me try to untangle it.
The "e-bomb" produces, very briefly and in a focused direction, an electromagnetic field equivalent to that of an "isotropic" (i.e., theoretical omnidirectional) radiator operating at about 2 billion watts - the same power as is continually produced by the generators at Hoover Dam.
Uh, I can see why they simplified it <>=<)B^).
8 posted on
01/20/2003 2:55:17 AM PST by
Erasmus
To: kattracks
KJV Revelation 13:13-14
13. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14. And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
10 posted on
01/20/2003 4:52:49 AM PST by
Elsie
(I trust in Jesus.... THOUSANDS OF EXISTING MANUSCRIPTS speak of Him!)
To: kattracks
Hoover Dam Given:
2 billion watts in 24 hours =
2 G W in 24 hours =
0.083 G W in 1 hour =
0.00138 G W in 1 minute =
2.315 e-5 G W in 1 second =
2.315 e-8 G W in 1 millisecond =
2.315 e-9 G W in 1 nanosecond =
So as you can readily see, it really is not all that much, if the interval is short enough!!!! /sarcasm off
13 posted on
01/20/2003 5:57:33 AM PST by
OReilly
To: kattracks
Posted
here^ on 1/19 with a bunch more info and comments.
Wonder what this does to bystanders? Crispy critters?
14 posted on
01/20/2003 5:58:51 AM PST by
upchuck
(ZAP Saddam!!)
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
Hmmm. I've noticed several articles like this lately, and television shows as well. The History Channel had a great program on last night about how the US is training soldiers in urban warfare and how we won't make the same mistakes that were make in Somalia (the biggest mistake, x42, is gone!).
Looks to me like huge PsyOps are going on with the intention of convincing Sadaam and his Generals that they'd better not try to fight us. If he decides to go with his delusions of granduer, too bad. I feel bad for the citizens of Iraq who'll be cought in the crossfire, but I'd bet that many have already made plans to bug out as soon as the first sign of trouble starts! They are fortunate that the US can direct fire pretty well to avoid civilians as much as possible. They are unfortunate in that Sadaam has PURPOSELY placed military bunkers in civilian areas and parked tanks next to hospitals and schools in the vain attempt to keep his military machines from being destroyed.
Smart bombs and Zot guns, anyone?
17 posted on
01/20/2003 6:03:20 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: Stand Watch Listen
Have you any more to add to this?
To: kattracks
A couple months back on the thread that spoke of Iraq getting Bi-static radars to try and defeat stealth technology, I suggested using EMP pulse weapons to kill the radar.
Nice to see the weapon boys are on the same sheet of music.
19 posted on
01/20/2003 6:05:14 AM PST by
Darksheare
(This tagline has been deleted by the Americans for Social Septicemia, "I got burning, in my soul!")
To: kattracks
Any effects on pacemakers?
20 posted on
01/20/2003 6:06:45 AM PST by
Textide
To: kattracks
How are WE protected against such devices?
22 posted on
01/20/2003 6:14:00 AM PST by
Securo
To: kattracks
ZOT!
34 posted on
01/20/2003 8:03:16 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Free Republic, the site supported by those who don't believe in free lunches! Are you a donor?)
To: Admin Moderator
Is this what you guys have been using to 'Zot' trolls?
35 posted on
01/20/2003 8:05:13 AM PST by
Darksheare
(This tagline has been deleted by the Americans for Social Septicemia, "I got burning, in my soul!")
To: *miltech
37 posted on
01/20/2003 8:32:58 AM PST by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: kattracks
ZAP=The Mother of all Zots!
40 posted on
01/20/2003 9:40:36 AM PST by
Balata
(FR Rocks! :-))
To: kattracks
The Pentagon's and many other crucial U.S. military communications and intelligence electronics are shielded against EMP and spy devices.
One has to wonder if Iraq has protected themselves as well. Even with the embargos, it's not very high tech stuff and underground bunkers would have an advantage.
I suspect this is a psy-ops tactic.
To: kattracks
The "e-bomb" contains as much power as what the Hoover Dam generates in 24 hours - about 2 billion watts - and it can all be loaded onto long-range cruise missiles. -----------------Unfortunately anyone with $400 can build one of these things. Theye won't be as powerful but they still will do the same thing. Awhile ago there was an article in Popular Mechanichs about this bomb. They really are quite simple.
43 posted on
01/20/2003 10:21:29 AM PST by
armyboy
(I support President Bush in the war on Iraq!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson