Posted on 12/20/2002 9:19:45 AM PST by PatrickHenry
Although it was discovered less than 40 years ago, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation has been around a lot longer than that. A relic from the early days of the Universe more than 14 billion years ago, the CMB is the oldest radiation on record. Current cosmological models posit that the CMB should be slightly polarized but this property has never been observed--until now. Researchers have successfully detected the CMB's polarization and found that it agrees with the theoretical estimates.
Erik Leitch and John Kovac of the University of Chicago and their colleagues used the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI), which is located at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, to study the CMB radiation. Over a two-year period, this array of radio telescopes collected radiation signals coming from deep space in two patches of blank sky. The resulting 271 days worth of useable data revealed the light's polarization (the direction in which the light's field oscillates as it travels toward an observer on the ground). Writing in the journal Nature, the scientists report that the CMB radiation's level and spatial distribution are in excellent agreement with the predictions of the standard theory. "If the light hadn't been polarized, that would mean that we would have to throw out our whole model of how we understand the physics of the early universe," Leitch notes. In an accompanying commentary, Matias Zaldarriaga of New York University calls the findings "both a remarkable technical achievement and a wonderful consistency check for the theory."
BB Cosmology involves the idea that space AND time come into existence concurrently at t=0. Therefore, by definition, there is no such thing as t<0. Hence, there is no "before" the BB, as the word "before" presupposes the ability to establish temporal order, and if there is no "time" then there can be no temporal order.
The standard way of illustrating this is to use the analogy that asking what is "before" the BB is like asking what is North of the North pole, or what is colder than absolute zero.
Because nobody's figured out any mathematically workable model that is consistent with the observed data.
Why do you need these beginning myths? Oh, the "expanding universe" you say? Turns out, at least from what I hear, that one's a myth too.
Well, you heard wrong, because the expansion of the universe is an observed fact. Even the old, failed "steady-state" models exhibited cosmological expansion.
Well, of course. It would have to.
That you can't be bothered to do the math is a poor substitute for a valid critique.
Really? It says that? I seem to be fresh out of Bibles with that mysterious sixth chapter of Titus, and I can't seem to find it online anywhere. Now, I'm no Bible wonk or anything, but maybe someone's slipping stuff in when you're not looking?
It would be very difficult for me to say....
Well, you heard wrong, because the expansion of the universe is an observed fact. Even the old, failed "steady-state" models exhibited cosmological expansion.
Do you have any evidence of that OTHER than redshift?
That's their destiny. They love it.
That would explain how the distance between myself and my exwife has been constantly increasing.
And also why the pants of my old Army uniform no longer fit.
That explains their stamina.
It's part of some kind of mantra they get from somewhere. I'm embarrassed to say what it reminds me of, but I won't let that stop me, of course.
In my misspent youth, I used to go in strip bars sometimes. (Blush!) The girls would try to talk to me and hustle me for some very expensive drinks. Would you believe that every one of those girls had just broken up with her boyfriend in the last week/month? Probably still true today, although my personal survey of the subject ended about 20 years ago.
I'm told--haven't checked this one out personally--that every criminal in the State Pen was framed, too.
Incredible numbers of the creos used to be evolutionisits until their minds expanded and they began to question. (If these are questioning minds, I'd hate to see "doctrinaire.")
I tend to put my old Air Force field jacket on when I wash my car in cold weather. (Said jacket and a blue raincoat being the last useful residues of my time in the service.) I just noticed today that the field jacket seems to have undergone some kind of thirty-years delayed shrinkage.
Yes. We can look at the time evolution of the most distant type Ia supernovae (in other words, how they increase and die off in brightness over time). These supernovae should follow the same profile over time, all over the universe. But supernovae that are receding from us rapidly will brighten and dim more slowly, for two reasons: the Doppler effect and time dilation. As it turns out, both of these effects are measurable in the distant supernovae and are in good agreement with the observed redshifts. There is no doubt that they are receding from us in a manner that increases with distance.
Yeah, like all those brilliant "scientists" at places like "Creation Research Institute" who used to be "darwinists" until they discovered Noah's Ark. Funny thing about those scientists ... they never seem to make any scientific discoveries. I wonder why that is.
I have a theory, of course. When you buy into "Goddidit," you don't want to hear anything else. Doesn't give you much to offer to the advancement of discovery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.