Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor (O'Reilly, a homodupe, spins out)

Stephen Bennett Ministries ^ | 12/4/2002 | Steve Bennett Ministries

[unspun]

From: Stephen Bennett Ministries Subject: Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor

*** MEDIA ALERT ***
Stephen Bennett Ministries Visit www.SBMinistries.org Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2002

Bill O'Reilly Confronts the 'Gay' Issue Again Tonight on The O'Reilly Factor - Fox News Channel Wednesday, Dec. 4th - 8pm & 11pm EST
Special Guest - Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH
------------------------------------------------------------
You may remember Stephen Bennett's appearance on The O'Reilly Factor on Sept. 3rd of this year. O'Reilly blasted Bennett, a 39 year old national Christian recording artist and former homosexual, as being a 'religious fanatic' and 'idiot.'

Stephen shared with millions his story of deliverance from homosexuality over 10 years ago and salvation in Jesus Christ. Bennett is now married to his wife Irene over 9 years. They are the parents of two little children.

Regarding his faith, new life in Jesus Christ and biblical beliefs that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God, O'Reilly verbally slammed Bennett and compared him to the 'hate-filled, Islamic terrorists of 9-11.'

Bill O'Reilly came out in full support of 'gay' special rights in the nation's largest homosexual magazine 'The Advocate' on Sept. 3rd. He gave his endorsement for homosexual adoptions and when pressed, even homosexual marriage.

Tonight, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) is scheduled to appear on The O'Reilly Factor, discussing his new book 'Preventing Homosexuality' and debating a 'gay' activist. Though NARTH is a 'non-religious' organization, Dr. Nicolosi is his highly respected for his research and contributions in the area of helping men and women overcome their unwanted same-sex attractions.

Please tune in tonight and keep Dr. Nicolosi in your prayers, that he will make a great impact to potentially reach millions, as well as our friend Bill O'Reilly, with three simple truths:

(1) NO ONE is born homosexual;
(2) In most cases has everything to do with childhood; and
(3) Complete change IS completely possible.

[Always Right]

Please join the rest of us "thinking" persons, Reverend.

Too bad the unthinking Reverend is correct. In Canada for example, which is way 'ahead' of us in the area of hate-crimes, hate speech such as the Dr. Laura Show is banned. If that is not an assult on free speech, I don't know what is.

[genew]

You reckon he's having a problem holding the mud?

[CapedCrusader]

Hey, I agree with you about Canada. It's outrageous. But our Constitution is strong, just like our First Amendment. That's why I'm not worried about Canadian thought control.

[JoJo Gunn]

Where are the voices of that activist organization Human “Rights” Watch now? They’re the ones who came up with and forced on everyone else that precious Coming Out Day. Well, Szabo came out as well, and he got canned for it, and here on this board we have an Apologist for something truly Evil. HomoFascists don’t keep the principles of free speech and freedom of association in mind for America. And they’re in our schools, thanks to GLSEN and the idiots who enable them.

Our ancestors knew hundreds and hundreds of years ago the dangers the homosexuals pose to the rest of us. They tried to warn us that homosexuals don’t want to be left alone, that they’re predators posing as prey, and they’ll forever be at our doors if we don’t stop them.

I still haven’t gotten an answer from every Enabler I’ve encountered-why do homosexuals need the approbation of children? Why are they brainwashing our kids in schools, who haven‘t even reached puberty yet? Aren’t homosexuals comfortable in their own person? What do they need with CHILDREN? Andwhy did they go after the BOY scouts instead of the Hell's Angels? The LPGA? Aunt Martha's Sewing Circle?

Oh, and you've conveniently ignored Jesse Dirkhising. But what are we to expect from an intellectual titan who thinks homosexuals who wear Nazi clothes need special dispensation?

Any of that violence you whine about gay on gay? Please, give it that Washington Times style spin....)

[CapedCrusader]

Just to clarify, these laws don't proclaim that homosexuals that get protected class status. It adds a category of "sexual orientation" which equally protects heterosexuals, as well.

Personally, I'm against anti-discrimination laws that seek to regulate private organizations. I believe it violates the very democratic principle of freedom of association.

And, providing no force or exploitation has been perpetrated, the government has no moral business regulating "depravity" with taxes, laws or any other means.

[Always Right]

Just to clarify, these laws don't proclaim that homosexuals that get protected class status. It adds a category of "sexual orientation" which equally protects heterosexuals, as well.

LOL. Let's be real. Do you think laws that protect against racial discrimination are used to protect whites from discrimination? Yeah, tell us another one.

[CapedCrusader]

Will you relax? Your charges are so scattershot and spazzed you must be in a complete lather over there.

They not only at our door, but they're already in our families and circles of friends and always will be.

Forced Coming Out Day on you? Ignore it, then, and anyone who "comes out" to you.

"Truly evil"? I'll just have to disagree with you, there.

re: GLSEN and schools. This should be a local matter, decided by the entire community. If they want that curriculum, so be it. If they don't, they don't. (With any curriculum, btw.) As far as "brainwashing" goes, if you think that the school curriculum has more influence over children's beliefs than their own families, you woefully underestimate the influence of families. And those classes are only teaching "respect", btw.

The Boys Scouts case arose internally. Not from any assault from external groups. And the courts decided that the BS do have the right to set membership criteria. Rightly so. And my guess is that the Hell's Angels or the LPGA or whatever other group you want to deflect to doesn't have anti-homosexual criteria, so there you go.

What about Jesse Dirkhising? It was sick and twisted. Jeez, if we're going to start characterizing all heterosexual people based on isolated examples of crimes, it wouldn't be pretty picture either.

But what are we to expect from an intellectual titan who thinks homosexuals who wear Nazi clothes need special dispensation?

For a minute, I thought you were talking about some homosexual Nazi organization, but I see you're just smearing.

Me whining? Again, you grossly mischaracterize. And, no, the assaults I referred to are clearly "fag bashing."

And, yes, domestic violence is a problem with homosexuals as it is with heterosexuals. No surprise there.

What would you propose to do about homosexuals? Imprison and institutionalize them like we have done in the past? You are fooling yourself if you think that homosexuality can be wiped off the face of the planet and that gay people are going away or are going to be invisible. So what next?

And, me, an intellectual titan? You flatter me. ; )

[CapedCrusader]

Then the problem is with execution of the law. But its a flawed law, just the same.

[Arioch7]

Even though I like O'Reilly, he has never been a Conservative.

A lot of people think that he is a Conservative because he is in many issues a realist. That means he is sane, so we identify him as a Conservative.

He is a populist.

[Always Right]

Then the problem is with execution of the law. But its a flawed law, just the same.

And why would this law be any different. Currently, anti-discrimination laws are used to make quotas and provide 'diviersity' by basing hiring and college admittance on race more than achievement and abilities. Maybe the Supreme Court will make a dent in this application of the law, but from the looks of things, even if the Supreme Court does rule against the practice, universities will just stop looking at test scores and grades so they can continue their discriminatory practices.

[CapedCrusader]

Because most crimes that would fall under this law are more likely to be committed against gay people than straight people? "Straight bashing" is not a cultural phenomenon. Gay bashing, unfortunately, is.

For the record:

Anti-discrimination laws for private organizations: while well-intentioned, a bad thing.

Stiffer penalties for crimes that are motivated by race, religion, ethinicity, etc: a good thing.

[LO_IQ]

This legislation basically sets up for a lawsuit against any minister or religious leader who publicly states that certain sexual behavior is immoral or improper

As much as despised the homosexual lobby, I don't understand why Christians have to misrepresent the facts in order to attack a bill.

If quoting the Bible against homosexual activity is a crime under this bill, how about quoting the Bible against people of different religions?

How many pastors have been charged under the unammended law that had "religion" as one of the categories of protected people?

Do pastors in PA not condemn false religion anymore?

[Clint N. Suhks]

empty slogans

Empty slogans humm? It got you to respond din it? In fact it conveys your position rather neatly if you ask me…and the better half of this forum.

Now now back to your dorm room, fire up your bong and turn on the Grateful Dead. It’s the closest contribution Liberaltarians will make to the power structure of this country.

[Always Right]

Because most crimes that would fall under this law are more likely to be committed against gay people than straight people? "Straight bashing" is not a cultural phenomenon.

The number of these hate crimes are grossly exaggerated. Most of these 'crimes' are 'intimidation', whatever that includes. I could probably count on my hands the number of murders in the US that were done because someone was gay in a year. Years later, the only one you ever hear about is Mathew Shephard. Shoot last week there was a gay that killed a Christian lady for preaching to him about homosexuality.

[JoJo Gunn]

Misrepresenting facts?

Considering how dangerous America has become because of Political Correctness, which Hitler called Social Correctness, I think there's every reason to be afraid of what the Fascists are doing.

To be honest, there's more reason than usual because the Republicans are selling out their religious base to troll for votes from Degenerates.

To recap, they're in our schools, they get special dispensation in the workplace, and the Republicans are selling out to them. You see nothing to be alarmed about?

[CapedCrusader]

Shoot last week...

You say that like it happens every week. It doesn't. Gay bashing does. Bet you didn't hear about the gay bar that was shot up in Roanake, Virginia, either.

[LO_IQ]

My priest says:

Statement 1:
Voodoo practitioners will go to hell unless they repent.

My priest also says:

Statement 2:
Homosexuality practitioners will go to hell unless they repent

According to you, my priest will be jailed for uttering Statement 2, but not for uttering Statement 1.

I don't follow your logic.

[CapedCrusader]

You see nothing to be alarmed about?

Again, I ask: "What's to be done?" And try to come up with something that doesn't impede on individual rights.

[Clint N. Suhks]

If anyone saw it, Nicolosi was worthless. He didn’t refute one assertion from the professional Homo-activist. He maybe spoke 10 words. What a disappointment.

[Always Right]

You say that like it happens every week. It doesn't. Gay bashing does.

And so does straight-bashing. Why do you think the term homophobe was created? It is not a real phobia, just a term to belittle people who disagree with an agenda.

Bet you didn't hear about the gay bar that was shot up in Roanake, Virginia, either.

Sure, that makes two. But the fact that the shooter was mentally ill and suisidal had nothing to do with the shooting.