Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, Jim (Jeffords would be "happy to caucus with the GOP")
Washington Times ^ | 11/20/02

Posted on 11/19/2002 10:41:53 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:59:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

James Jeffords surely must be the loneliest senator on Capitol Hill. Just six months after the Republican leadership pulled out all the stops to get the Vermonter re-elected in 2000

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2002 10:41:53 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
According to a senior Senate leadership source, the election results were barely in before Mr. Jeffords' office put out feelers to his former party's leaders. The message? That the Vermonter would be happy to caucus with the GOP — so long as he retained his committee chairmanship. Republican leaders rightly rolled their eyes.

This guy gives a new meaning to the word prick.

2 posted on 11/19/2002 10:46:32 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I suggest that he go do something involving his head and his anus.
3 posted on 11/19/2002 10:48:04 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
You mean . . .


4 posted on 11/19/2002 10:49:51 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hahahaha, Jeffords thought that the tide in American was going to the left so he went with it at the expense of Republicans. After the landslide Republican victories of a few days ago the other side of the fence isn't so green for Mr. Jeffords. And I love it.
5 posted on 11/19/2002 10:50:21 PM PST by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
To show how much respect I've lost for Lott and the Senate Republicans, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they granted him his wish.
6 posted on 11/19/2002 10:50:51 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Bob Smith School of Politics huh???
7 posted on 11/19/2002 10:51:18 PM PST by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
ping
8 posted on 11/19/2002 10:56:12 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
As much as I respect the Washington Times, I find this hard to believe. If he was thinking he'd worm his way back over to the GOP side of the aisle, he wouldn't have voted against Homeland Security...which he did today.
9 posted on 11/19/2002 10:56:55 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The worst thing about his switch is that it was the first time since the Whig party the seat was not in the hands of the GOP. That Seat was Republican since the 1850'S
10 posted on 11/19/2002 10:57:23 PM PST by TJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thank you!
11 posted on 11/19/2002 11:00:07 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Maybe he voted against it after they told him to get lost. Then again, he probably thought they would take him back, no matter what had happened. He seems to be very full of himself.
12 posted on 11/19/2002 11:02:30 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
If the Senate had a seat reserved for the "differently-abled", Jeffords would be in it.

Love your #3. Very funny.

13 posted on 11/19/2002 11:06:25 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
According to a senior Senate leadership source, the election results were barely in before Mr. Jeffords' office put out feelers to his former party's leaders. The message? That the Vermonter would be happy to caucus with the GOP — so long as he retained his committee chairmanship.

Even I am flabberghasted by this.
And now the Democrats know about this pathetic old scumbag's treachery.
I'd say he's toast.

14 posted on 11/19/2002 11:11:22 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Un-efing-believable! I hope they kick him off of that committee, since he sold his soul to chair it. For one man to reverse the result of an election, he deserves retaliation for being so vicious and vindictive. They should move his office to the broom closet and forbid him to sit on any committee. The creep.
15 posted on 11/19/2002 11:12:01 PM PST by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Ann Archy; JulieRNR21; StarFan; McGavin999; leadpenny; Joe Montana; buffyt; ...
ping
16 posted on 11/19/2002 11:12:05 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Thanks!
17 posted on 11/19/2002 11:13:02 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RJayneJ
Who is going to give this pariah a Committee assignment?

The Republicans? They have no reason to give Jim Jeffords a damned thing.

The Democrats? I suspect that in the minority, they will look to protecting their own.

I think Jim Jeffords is going to be the lonliest man in Washington this side of the Iraqi Embassy.
18 posted on 11/19/2002 11:31:36 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
At 68, senile Jumpin' Jimmy should just hang it up, seek treatment for his Alzhiemers, and let Dr. Dean pick a replacement.
19 posted on 11/19/2002 11:32:21 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I think you are absolutely right. The democrats are losing one seat on each committee, they won't allow one of their own to go without a seat just so Jeffords can have one. If we take LA on the 7th, they'll be losing TWO seats on each committee. :o)
20 posted on 11/19/2002 11:36:49 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson