Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
As much as I respect the Washington Times, I find this hard to believe. If he was thinking he'd worm his way back over to the GOP side of the aisle, he wouldn't have voted against Homeland Security...which he did today.
9 posted on 11/19/2002 10:56:55 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Deb
Maybe he voted against it after they told him to get lost. Then again, he probably thought they would take him back, no matter what had happened. He seems to be very full of himself.
12 posted on 11/19/2002 11:02:30 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
I think this mis-guided fool had already been told "NO!", so his vote against Homeland Security was his "I'll get you by snapping my fingers in your general direction!" gesture.

He will likely be ignored by both sides for the rest of his career in the Senate. Vermont is basically unrepresented as of January.

38 posted on 11/20/2002 4:11:49 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
", the election results were barely in before Mr. Jeffords' office put out feelers to his former party's leaders."

My take on this is that, Jeffords made the offer over a week ago and it was turned-down, thus he voted Democrat to show his "independence."
72 posted on 11/20/2002 6:56:00 AM PST by Sweet Hour of Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
I think Jeffords was rebuked shortly after the election. He knows now he's nobody.
74 posted on 11/20/2002 7:01:49 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson