Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: Idea of 'women's issues' a lie
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 11/17/2002 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 11/17/2002 9:48:47 AM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2002 9:48:47 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

2 posted on 11/17/2002 9:50:09 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The media is deafeningly silent to the huge gap of men who vote for Republicans. There is no discussion of why men will overwhelmingly vote for republicans. What are the issues that concern men as a group? Whatever they are the democrat party does not represent them. The joke of "real men don't for democrat party" will not be so funny in the future.
3 posted on 11/17/2002 10:00:57 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This woman's issues: defense, gun rights, tax relief, pro-life. 'Rats make me sick!
4 posted on 11/17/2002 10:02:51 AM PST by Tax-chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Pokey, thanks for the ping. Mark, thanks for the translation. It's a rare paper where a conservative doesn't have to read between the lines.
5 posted on 11/17/2002 10:06:43 AM PST by Lady Jag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
hmmm. Well, this woman has some issues. My issues including keeping the country safe for my children and grandchildren, and letting us all keep more of the money we earn. In fact, if the government would let me keep enough of my money, I'd be glad to take care of my own retirement and health care.

I can think of a few more priorities I have, but I doubt they'd be considered "women's issues" - I'm not interested in the right to kill my unborn children, and I never depended on the government to feed my children or provide child care for them, for instance.

6 posted on 11/17/2002 10:07:14 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Remind me never to complain about ''liberal media bias'' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

I keep telling my Democratic friends this. They don't get it when I tell them that the Republican Party is sometimes strengthened by the press' double standard.

The press coverage of Republicans weeds out our moral weaklings and keeps theirs in power. Bob Packwood (gone); Bill Clinton (further empowered, to the chagrin of the Dems)...

7 posted on 11/17/2002 10:09:43 AM PST by krb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"That's likely to prove more relevant in the two years ahead than whether she looks better in a bikini than Walter Mondale."

Now if that isn't a disgusting thought, and offense to man and nature.

Steyn as always a fun read.

8 posted on 11/17/2002 10:18:32 AM PST by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
What a fantastic piece. KUTGW, Mark!

Thanks, Pokey.

pb
9 posted on 11/17/2002 10:21:14 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Thought you'd like to see this...
10 posted on 11/17/2002 10:31:58 AM PST by Tony in Hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Can I get on your Stein ping list?
11 posted on 11/17/2002 10:42:17 AM PST by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Just about the least interesting thing about Pelosi is that she's a woman. What's interesting is that she's a Haight-Ashbury leftist who voted against war with Iraq. That's likely to prove more relevant in the two years ahead than whether she looks better in a bikini than Walter Mondale.

Hmmmm. I can't decide. Walter or Nancy? Nancy or Walter? Can I just pick my wife?

12 posted on 11/17/2002 10:58:51 AM PST by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Among female voters under 30, as many voted Republican as Democrat.

Oh this does deserve repeating.

a.cricket

13 posted on 11/17/2002 11:01:33 AM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Remind me never to complain about ''liberal media bias'' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

LOL!! What a great line! We DO still need to be aware of the bias and work against it whenever it is damaging to our causes, but when the media is assisting in the crashing and burning of the Dems, we just need to step out of the way!

14 posted on 11/17/2002 11:05:13 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Can I get on your Stein ping list?

Me too?

15 posted on 11/17/2002 11:09:29 AM PST by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Can't say it often enough: the liberal press unwittingly works for us...

The boos for Trent Lott? The walkout by Gov. Jesse Ventura? The totalitarian hectoring by Wellstone aide Rick Kahn as he singled out attending Republicans by name and demanded they switch sides? Jonathan Karl sat through all of it and evidently thought none of it worth mentioning. It was the same with Jodi Wilgoren in the New York Times, whose report of the event--''Mourning In Minnesota''--seemed blithely unaware of its tenor. Kahn's partisan bullying was described only as a ''spirited eulogy.'' Karl and Wilgoren missed the story: They saw what millions of American TV viewers saw, but they were either blind or averted their eyes.

Remind me never to complain about ''liberal media bias'' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

16 posted on 11/17/2002 11:33:31 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Remind me never to complain about ''liberal media bias'' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.

It's getting to the point where I almost wish nobody would point this out, lest it ruin a good thing.

17 posted on 11/17/2002 12:34:56 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
That's likely to prove more relevant in the two years ahead than whether she looks better in a bikini than Walter Mondale.

I love Steyn, but he really looks small when he cattily draws attention to how much better Walter would look in a bikini than Nancy would!

18 posted on 11/17/2002 1:37:54 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post and ping, Pokey !

Now Judy is all a-twitter because Nancy Pelosi has become the first woman in Congress to be elected party leader.

Who cares? Just about the least interesting thing about Pelosi is that she's a woman. What's interesting is that she's a Haight-Ashbury leftist who voted against war with Iraq. That's likely to prove more relevant in the two years ahead than whether she looks better in a bikini than Walter Mondale. What is a ''women's issue'' anyway? To some, it might be the sacred constitutional right to avail oneself of a partial-birth abortion. But to others it might be the war on terror. After all, if there's one single issue that distinguishes Western values from Islamofascism, it's the treatment of women. Imagine being forbidden by law to go to school or leave the house unaccompanied. Imagine the state deciding what clothes you can wear. Imagine being prevented by law from feeling sunlight on your face. I'd say voting for people who liberate women from theocratic fascism is a women's issue.



19 posted on 11/17/2002 1:55:35 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The other story that might be worth going with is ''Young Women Hot For Republicans.''

sound of snickering Oschisms

20 posted on 11/17/2002 2:06:45 PM PST by Oschisms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson