Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

7 nukes in U.S.,warns al-Qaida [HOAX]
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 11/14/2002 7:20:07 PM PST by Salvation

7 nukes in U.S.,
warns al-Qaida

Man claiming to be top bin Laden operative threatens to kill millions, destroy economy


Posted: November 14, 2002
9:20 p.m. Eastern


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

Terrorists have placed seven nuclear bombs in as many U.S. cities and will soon detonate them, causing millions of casualties, massive panic and destroying the world's biggest economy, warns a top al-Qaida operative in an interview with Al-Jazeera television in Qatar.

While much of the world's attention has been riveted on Al-Jazeera's broadcast of an audiotape apparently made by Osama bin Laden, this more specific threat aired on the station has received scant media coverage.

The spectacular threats were made by a man claiming to be Mohammed al-Usuquf, reputedly al-Qaida's No. 3 operative. Al-Usuquf is said to be a doctor in physics who holds a master's degree in international economics. A copy of the interview was sent to the prestigious Arab-language daily Al Quds Al Arabi, edited in London, but it was not printed.

Parts of the interview were published by Asia Times, which could confirm neither the identity of the man nor his membership in al-Qaida.

Al-Usuquf says al-Qaida's Kuwaiti spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, and bin Laden himself, suggested that he grant the interview. Bin Laden, he says, is "alive and healthy, along with his commanders Mohammed Atef, Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar."

While Al-Usuquf begins the interview by criticizing Washington for its positions on the Kyoto Protocol on climatic change, the International Criminal Court, the Palestinian cause and for its "financial greed," he concludes by saying America must be destroyed.

"Aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and spy satellites will be worthless in the next war," he says.

Al-Qaida has 5,000 first-rank operatives and around 20,000 others all over the world.

"We have more than 500 first-rank and 800 second-rank [operatives] inside the U.S.," he says.

He explains that "first rank" means they have lived in the U.S. for more than 10 years, most of them married with children.

"They have an idea about the plans, and they are just waiting for a call."

"Second-rank" operatives arrived in the past five years and "have no idea about the plans," he says.

All are willing to die for the cause, he says.

Sept. 11 "was just the beginning," says al-Usuquf. "It was a way to call the world's attention to what's going to happen."

He details a plan to destroy the U.S. by "attacking the heart of what they (Americans) consider the most important thing in the world – money."

This economic cataclysm will be prompted, he says, by "destroying America's seven largest cities and some other measures" with "atomic bombs."

The bombs "won't be launched," he says. "They are already there. Seven nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before Sept. 11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before Sept. 11, American security was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could position the bombs there. They arrived through seaports as normal cargo. A nuclear head is not bigger than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as one. Thousands of containers arrive at a seaport every day, and even with very efficient security, it's impossible to check and examine each one of them."

Al-Usuquf says the bombs were bought on the black market – five from the former USSR and two from Pakistan. The five Russian heads "are from T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and their power is around 100 kilotons each. That is five times the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani ones are less powerful, something around 10 kilotons each."

Each of the Russian bombs would have cost around $200 million, claims Al-Ususquf. Al-Qaida was able to raise the money "because we have many sponsors. Many countries sponsor us, and also some very rich people."

Not all of the sponsoring nations are Arab countries, he says.

"Some European countries as well are interested in the fall of the U.S." As to the "rich people," they are "people who are also tired of seeing the U.S. bleeding the rest of the world."

Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but just a collaborator, represented by Abdul Tawab Hawaish, his vice prime minister and responsible for Iraq's arms program."

Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot be detected by U.S. authorities.

"Even if they are old, they were modernized and are very well hidden," he told Al-Jazeera. "Even if they were located, they have auto-detonation mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of deactivating them."

The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead." They could be detonated "by various methods – cellphone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their regressive clock."

Al-Usuquf details the whole plan in the Al-Jazeera interview.

"First, one head would be detonated, which would cause the deaths of 800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never seen before," he said. "During this chaos, two or three planes, which are now disassembled inside barns near empty roads in the U.S. countryside, would take off in suicide missions to pulverize another two or three big American cities with chemicals. Once the disease was identified, all seaports and airports would be quarantined. Land borders would also be closed. No plane, boat or car would enter or leave the U.S. This would be total chaos."

The first target would be the city "that would offer the best conditions, for example bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an hour blowing toward the center of the country, so radioactive dust can contaminate the largest possible area."

This attack would not knock out the U.S, recognizes al-Usuquf.

"But the process would be initiated," he explains. "As with the World Trade Center, it would be just a question of time for the whole economic structure to be turned to dust. If the objectives are reached with one bomb and diseases, probably we will save the lives of other people, but it's risky, and probably six more bombs will be detonated, one a week, and more attacks with chemical weapons will be launched."

According to estimates made by al-Usuquf and Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaida's No. 2 man and a physician, about 15 million people would die, victims of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated by diseases, "25 percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million, plus many others due to the chaos and disorder."

But the real cost will be the American economy, says al-Usuquf.

The world economy would not collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the beginning, it will be very difficult. But without the U.S., the world will soon rise in a more just and fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan."

And whatever America does, "it's too late."

Al-Usuquf refused to give any indication as to when the attacks would begin.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aljazeeratv; alqaida; alusuquf; attacks; binladen; economy; hoax; killing; mohammedalusuquf; nukesinus; operativesinus; threats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-282 next last
To: sweetliberty
That was my thought.......
261 posted on 11/14/2002 11:57:29 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I know, I'm using using my reply, to you, to whack the gullible, here, over the head. LOL
262 posted on 11/14/2002 11:57:51 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
No problemo.....
263 posted on 11/14/2002 11:59:10 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Because newspapers don't DO that; that's why !
264 posted on 11/15/2002 12:01:34 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I have clicked on the Asian TImes link and the article in question pops up. I refreshed the page and its still there. Now maybe its some quirk, I don;t know. But several times I have tried the link and the article is NOT deleted for my eyes.

Is the article a hoax? Who knows. Is it psyops, very possible...so thats my report for now.

265 posted on 11/15/2002 12:09:18 AM PST by abigkahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: abigkahuna
Go to the link, early on this thread ( around #6, I think ) and click on it. You'll find a HOAX page, wherein it';s explained. Evidently, this garbage has been floating around for a while.
266 posted on 11/15/2002 12:24:31 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
: ) but I wasn't series.
267 posted on 11/15/2002 3:49:56 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Taiwan Bocks
"Anybody know a senior military official
who can give his independent opinion that Mecca and Medina
should be vaporized immediately if such attacks took place? "

Not offhand, but I think I can possible locate a POTUS that does.
268 posted on 11/15/2002 4:43:00 AM PST by ranger0283
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"Why would a greenie or a RAT want to scare us more about terrorists?"

Who knows what those people think. I can't figure out why any of them would vote democrat in the first place.

More than likely this was some kids idea of a joke. Much like many of the computer viruses that get written, most of them are written by kids, who have a lot of time, are inquisitive, and don't really understand what the consequences of their actions can be.

Which is by definition the same thing as the Democratic party.

269 posted on 11/15/2002 5:43:23 AM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: greggy
The Chechens are a little different, they actually have a fairly normal goal, there's just no way Russia will give it to them. Even then that's really not a threat, not like this fictitious nukes stuff. He's not giving any indication of what next time is, not like "your movie theaters shall never be safe again" that's a threat.

No, just like what we did to Japan, if one goes off we have no idea if there are any others. That's why the second nuke on Japan was so important, it showed we had more... and it was a bluff. And they could be too. Do you actually take the word of a psychotic blood lustsing killer? Remember the story of the turtle and the scorpion.

There's no peace settlement to negotiate with Washington, if the terrorists don't want to be wiped out they've got two choices: stop being terrorists, pray for a Democrat in 04. I I don't care what he considers himself, when I was a kid I considered myself an up and coming soccer star, now I've got a beer gut and spend my life in front of computers. He IS a terrorist, and these kind of threatened actions are nothing more than a desperate attempt to have the effect of terrorism (scaring us) without actually doing anything. The only reason to do that is if you can't actually do anything, the threat of a bomb will never have the same terror effect as an actual bomb.
270 posted on 11/15/2002 6:51:23 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The statesments about the 10 and 5 year operatives got my attention more than the nuclear threats.

The one that caught my eye was the one about setting a bomb off with a cell phone.

If these bombs have been in place since before 9/11, and they're going to denotate it with a cell phone, what/who is keeping that phone battery charged?

271 posted on 11/15/2002 7:26:21 AM PST by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ProudEagle
If you stand back and take a look at [George Bush's] tactics the the past few years, I'd say he's a "give 'em enough rope and let them hang themselves" kind of guy. Domestically, little Tommy Daschle and Dickie Gephart have been sent packing eh?. I can only imagine what's transpired and communicated to other nations who refuse to respect the rest of civilization.

Agreed. A terrorist nuke on American soil would certainly give him temporary carte blanche to put Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt -- the whole miserable lot of them -- under a nuclear ultimatum with a very short fuse (say 48 hours). It would be worthwhile to drop a nuclear nasty on some camels somewhere in the muslim middle east, just to ensure that no one questions our intention of going further.

And, the ultimatum? Serve up your terrorists, preferably their severed heads on long poles and broadcast this on every international TV hookup available.

But I damn sure think the muslims underestimate this country.

I wish I could put my fingers on an analysis some Brit made right after 9/11. His thesis was that Western nations generally -- all the way back to the Greeks -- have been extravagently lethal when aroused. Honestly, I do not think the USA is aroused, when more people die of smoking every month than died in the WTC. However, a nuke that took out several hundred thousand? Now, that would get things to perking right nicely. And, I agree -- GWB would have little choice but to nuke someone/something in return. No president would have much choice in that situation.

And if you're gonna have to nuke 'em, you'd better be ready to get the biggest bang for your nuclear buck. And, that means taking out every single Muslim center of power out there -- all of them, including the Saudis and the Pakistanis -- North Africa, everything.

272 posted on 11/15/2002 7:54:12 AM PST by Brandybux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
AsiaTimes has apologized and explained their error but not WorldNetDaily yet

WND HTML preserved for posterity

WorldNetDaily          
     
   
           
THURSDAY
NOVEMBER 14
2002
 
 
           



  ShopNetDaily
  Page 1 News
  Page 2 News
  LocalNetDaily
  Commentary
  Classified Ads
  Letters
  People Search
  SportsNetDaily
  Health
  Weather
  TV Guide
  Movies
  Business
  Stocks



   
WND
HOMELAND INSECURITY
7 nukes in U.S.,
warns al-Qaida

Man claiming to be top bin Laden operative threatens to kill millions, destroy economy

Posted: November 14, 2002
9:20 p.m. Eastern


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

Terrorists have placed seven nuclear bombs in as many U.S. cities and will soon detonate them, causing millions of casualties, massive panic and destroying the world's biggest economy, warns a top al-Qaida operative in an interview with Al-Jazeera television in Qatar.

While much of the world's attention has been riveted on Al-Jazeera's broadcast of an audiotape apparently made by Osama bin Laden, this more specific threat aired on the station has received scant media coverage.

The spectacular threats were made by a man claiming to be Mohammed al-Usuquf, reputedly al-Qaida's No. 3 operative. Al-Usuquf is said to be a doctor in physics who holds a master's degree in international economics. A copy of the interview was sent to the prestigious Arab-language daily Al Quds Al Arabi, edited in London, but it was not printed.

Parts of the interview were published by Asia Times, which could confirm neither the identity of the man nor his membership in al-Qaida.

Al-Usuquf says al-Qaida's Kuwaiti spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, and bin Laden himself, suggested that he grant the interview. Bin Laden, he says, is "alive and healthy, along with his commanders Mohammed Atef, Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar."

While Al-Usuquf begins the interview by criticizing Washington for its positions on the Kyoto Protocol on climatic change, the International Criminal Court, the Palestinian cause and for its "financial greed," he concludes by saying America must be destroyed.

"Aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and spy satellites will be worthless in the next war," he says.

Al-Qaida has 5,000 first-rank operatives and around 20,000 others all over the world.

"We have more than 500 first-rank and 800 second-rank [operatives] inside the U.S.," he says.

He explains that "first rank" means they have lived in the U.S. for more than 10 years, most of them married with children.

"They have an idea about the plans, and they are just waiting for a call."

"Second-rank" operatives arrived in the past five years and "have no idea about the plans," he says.

All are willing to die for the cause, he says.

Sept. 11 "was just the beginning," says al-Usuquf. "It was a way to call the world's attention to what's going to happen."

He details a plan to destroy the U.S. by "attacking the heart of what they (Americans) consider the most important thing in the world – money."

This economic cataclysm will be prompted, he says, by "destroying America's seven largest cities and some other measures" with "atomic bombs."

The bombs "won't be launched," he says. "They are already there. Seven nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before Sept. 11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before Sept. 11, American security was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could position the bombs there. They arrived through seaports as normal cargo. A nuclear head is not bigger than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as one. Thousands of containers arrive at a seaport every day, and even with very efficient security, it's impossible to check and examine each one of them."

Al-Usuquf says the bombs were bought on the black market – five from the former USSR and two from Pakistan. The five Russian heads "are from T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and their power is around 100 kilotons each. That is five times the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani ones are less powerful, something around 10 kilotons each."

Each of the Russian bombs would have cost around $200 million, claims Al-Ususquf. Al-Qaida was able to raise the money "because we have many sponsors. Many countries sponsor us, and also some very rich people."

Not all of the sponsoring nations are Arab countries, he says.

"Some European countries as well are interested in the fall of the U.S." As to the "rich people," they are "people who are also tired of seeing the U.S. bleeding the rest of the world."

Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but just a collaborator, represented by Abdul Tawab Hawaish, his vice prime minister and responsible for Iraq's arms program."

Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot be detected by U.S. authorities.

"Even if they are old, they were modernized and are very well hidden," he told Al-Jazeera. "Even if they were located, they have auto-detonation mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of deactivating them."

The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead." They could be detonated "by various methods – cellphone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their regressive clock."

Al-Usuquf details the whole plan in the Al-Jazeera interview.

"First, one head would be detonated, which would cause the deaths of 800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never seen before," he said. "During this chaos, two or three planes, which are now disassembled inside barns near empty roads in the U.S. countryside, would take off in suicide missions to pulverize another two or three big American cities with chemicals. Once the disease was identified, all seaports and airports would be quarantined. Land borders would also be closed. No plane, boat or car would enter or leave the U.S. This would be total chaos."

The first target would be the city "that would offer the best conditions, for example bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an hour blowing toward the center of the country, so radioactive dust can contaminate the largest possible area."

This attack would not knock out the U.S, recognizes al-Usuquf.

"But the process would be initiated," he explains. "As with the World Trade Center, it would be just a question of time for the whole economic structure to be turned to dust. If the objectives are reached with one bomb and diseases, probably we will save the lives of other people, but it's risky, and probably six more bombs will be detonated, one a week, and more attacks with chemical weapons will be launched."

According to estimates made by al-Usuquf and Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaida's No. 2 man and a physician, about 15 million people would die, victims of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated by diseases, "25 percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million, plus many others due to the chaos and disorder."

But the real cost will be the American economy, says al-Usuquf.

The world economy would not collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the beginning, it will be very difficult. But without the U.S., the world will soon rise in a more just and fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan."

And whatever America does, "it's too late."

Al-Usuquf refused to give any indication as to when the attacks would begin.


Related special offers:

Books on civil defense

Soviet Civil Defense: Video series





   E-mail to a Friend        Printer-friendly version
 
NEWS:

'Savage Nation' hits Top 100 on Amazon list
 
Muslims press case against Jerry Falwell
 
Top Egyptian cleric justifies suicide attacks
 
CIA releases new 'Noah's Ark' documents
 
Motion called 'garbage' in right-to-die case
 
Iran-Syria relations strained
 
'Bush' confronts 'Saddam' on 'Conan O'Brien'
 
COMMENTARY:

Ultimate education system
By David Kupelian
 
What the government knew
By Joseph Farah
 
Special advice for Democrats
By Ann Coulter
 
 
   




GO TO PAGE 1 | GO TO PAGE 2 | GO TO COMMENTARY

SEARCH WND | CONTACT WND
 
     
WorldNetDaily.com

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Contact WND
 

273 posted on 11/15/2002 8:42:42 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Budge
The one that caught my eye was the one about setting a bomb off with a cell phone.
If these bombs have been in place since before 9/11, and they're going to denotate it with a cell phone, what/who is keeping that phone battery charged?

And isn't it nice to know that their cellphone trigger is lead shielded from ECM, yet still would work ?
When they become nuclear capable they will use it immediately - even if they only have one and blow it off on a ship somewhere just to show the world they can.

274 posted on 11/15/2002 8:53:38 AM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I repeat: IF THERE WERE, INDEED, 7 NUKES PLANTED AROUND THE USA, WHY THEN WERE THEY NOT SET OFF BEFORE ? WHY USE PLANES FLYING INTO BUILDINGS, WHEN YOU CAN DO SO MUCH MORE HARM, SETTING OFF THE NUKES ?

Like the devil with Jesus, they like to wait for a more opportune time.

An assault timed properly-- say between or around Thanksgiving and Christmas -- would be beyond excruciatingly painful for all of us.

275 posted on 11/15/2002 9:51:47 AM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"Let's all talk about how we can turn lead into gold"

Uh, but... It is theoretically possible to turn lead into gold with the right series of nuclear reactions. A net loss of 3 protons and 8 neutrons from lead-208 (the most common isotope) yields gold-197. It is just ridiculously difficult and expensive to do. Easier to harvest gold from seawater.
276 posted on 11/15/2002 10:27:28 AM PST by calenel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: ECM
Apparently this is a hoax:

Mebby yes, mebby no. Since when did about.com become expert in these matters?

277 posted on 11/15/2002 10:33:19 AM PST by advocate10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: advocate10
about.com says the interview was translated from Arabic into Portuguese by someone in Foz-do-Iguaçu (in Brazil). According to an article in the New Yorker a couple of weeks ago, Foz-do-Iguaçu is a center of Islamism and terrorism.
278 posted on 11/15/2002 1:24:08 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; abigkahuna
**But why did about.com decide this is a hoax?**
Good question..............................

Please pardon me if my tinfoil hat has slipped over my eyes: I could not find an *explanation* for this hoax label. I did a search on snopes and truthorfiction.com this afternoon and got no results on the story/e-mail. These two sites are good at identifying how they've researched stories and identified them as truth or hoaxes.

I wondered .... *if* this were an actual interview, would it be "too much" for us in the eyes of the government?   e.g. "You can't handle the truth!"

279 posted on 11/15/2002 3:23:36 PM PST by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The Chechens are a little different, they actually have a fairly normal goal, there's just no way Russia will give it to them.

Ya, and I wouldn't either lest I be converted or killed one day also...

280 posted on 11/16/2002 7:23:23 AM PST by greggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson