Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Plan to Shake Hands Via Internet
reuters.com ^ | October 28, 2002 06:04 PM ET | Reuters

Posted on 10/28/2002 3:34:05 PM PST by Nachum

LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists in Britain and the United States will try to shake hands on Tuesday.

No big deal one might think -- only they will be 5,000 km (3,000 miles) apart, using the Internet to connect them.

In a technological first, they will use pencil-like devices called phantoms to recreate the sense of touch across the Atlantic, organizers of the experiment said.

The phantoms send small impulses at very high frequencies down the Internet using newly developed fiber optic cables and extremely high bandwidths.

When a scientist in London prods a screen with the phantom, the sensation should be felt by a colleague in Boston, and vice versa.

"Pushing on the pen sends data representing forces through the Internet that can be interpreted by a phantom and therefore felt on the other end," said Mel Slater, Professor of Computer Science at University College London (UCL).

"You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

UCL will conduct the experiment on Tuesday with colleagues from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Two scientists -- one in London and one in Boston -- will try to pick up a cube between them and move it, each responding to the force the other exerts on it.

The secret behind the technology is the speed at which the successive impulses are sent -- up to 1,000 Hertz," UCL said in a statement.

"In much the same way that the brain re-interprets still images into moving pictures, the frequencies received by the phantom are similarly integrated to produce the sense of a continuous sensation," it said.

The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."

If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: shakehands
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: PJ-Comix
Actually we've already seen Step 2 in a movie---Sleeper. Remember?

LOL! A Woody Allen classic!

BTW, loved your # 19. An uplifting post!

21 posted on 10/28/2002 4:25:33 PM PST by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

I can foresee a huge surge in telecommunications stocks if this became widely available .. :)

22 posted on 10/28/2002 4:31:53 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

Hmmmm....
23 posted on 10/28/2002 4:34:44 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Think what this will do for the sex trade!
24 posted on 10/28/2002 4:36:58 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
In a technological first, they will use pencil-like devices called phantoms to recreate the sense of touch across the Atlantic...

OH GOD, I knew this was coming! (oops sorry for the pun)
Actually I thought of this a few years ago and might have considered trying to patent it but it seemed too scummy.

Man connects with prostitute in south east asia, they both strap on their touch devices, and well you know the rest...

I am sure this technology is coming, oops, will arrive, soon to a computer store near you.

25 posted on 10/28/2002 4:38:02 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
Here is a list of people I would like to "touch" with this gizmo:

1. Petra Verkaik (obviously)

2. Wonder Woman (mmmmm....)

3. Mary Landrieu (Don't agree with her but she's the Senator I would most like to "touch" via the gizmo.)

4. Beth Ostroski (Just to make Howard Stern jealous.)

5. Salma Hayek (She's going to portray that weird Mexican commie-lib one-eyebrowed artist chick on the big screen but I forgive her.)

6. Sophia Loren (Any way to make the settings of this device so that the chix will feel as they appeared 40 years ago?)

7. Anita Ekberg (See above.)

8. Ursula Andress (As she appeared in "Dr. No")

9. Jennifer Connelly (But only in her pre-anorexiac personna.)

10. All of the Playboy Playmates up to but NOT including the Implant Era.

26 posted on 10/28/2002 4:40:37 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
you dont get many of those to a pound
27 posted on 10/28/2002 4:45:32 PM PST by al baby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
But how do you know who you would be "touching"? It could be a man, a grandmother, or a computer program.

Sounds like a good way for somebody to make money. That's about all for now.

28 posted on 10/28/2002 4:48:48 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Warning, rather graphic language but this is all I can think of when I see this.
29 posted on 10/28/2002 4:49:22 PM PST by Fire_on_High
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
This'll give cybersex a whole new meaning.
30 posted on 10/28/2002 4:49:23 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Exactly! It's just a matter of time.
31 posted on 10/28/2002 4:50:59 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
This is old news, pr0n industry is funding the research....... go figure.
32 posted on 10/28/2002 5:11:18 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: weikel

33 posted on 10/28/2002 5:11:55 PM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
But how do you know who you would be "touching"? It could be a man, a grandmother, or a computer program.

If you can tell whether you are "touching" a man or a woman from the get-go, then you have problems.

34 posted on 10/28/2002 5:14:22 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Oops! Substitue "can't" for "can" in first sentence. Actually I wouldn't mind touching a few "cans."
35 posted on 10/28/2002 5:15:42 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
First- I'm happy to see you found one of Petra with enough clothes on to post.

Second - When I purchase a car on the web, I want it to materialize in my garage the exact moment my account is debted. To heck with handshakes and cheap feels. Lets have some serious 21st Century technobable here!!:-)

Thirdly - is a POSTVERT what you become once your preverted ways deminish or is it too perverted to place in a timeline?

What a twisted post! :-)
36 posted on 10/28/2002 5:21:50 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
ONLY RELEVANT QUESTION:
Who's tax dollars are paying for this stupidity?
37 posted on 10/28/2002 5:24:06 PM PST by XLurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XLurk
You think technology is stupid?

And to answer your only relevant question: YOU ARE!
38 posted on 10/28/2002 5:36:45 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: XLurk
Who's tax dollars are paying for this stupidity?

I don't really see this as stupidity. Aside from the prurient uses, think about long distance surgery. What if someone in orbit got struck by a microscopic meteor? This technology, in combination with those that already exist, would allow a trauma surgeon anywhere with a high-bandwidth connection to see the operating area in 3-D, control all available surgical tools, and feel the wound. The same would apply to those living in extremely rural areas (Western Canada or the Outback, for instance), or those that are so emergent that they wouldn't make it to a hospital (an accident on Everest as an example).

Sounds pretty useful to me.

39 posted on 10/28/2002 5:37:52 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Porn industry always been a wonderful engine of progress lol.
40 posted on 10/28/2002 5:41:47 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson