Skip to comments.
The Culpability of William Jefferson Clinton
http://www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets/Bubba.html ^
Posted on 10/20/2002 10:03:55 AM PDT by repub32
lest we forget
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
Perhaps if Clinton had kept his promises, over 3,000 people would be alive today.
In 1996 the government of Sudan had Osama bin Laden in their custody and offered to hand him over to the United States. Bill Clinton and his liberal cohorts elected not to take the Sudanese up on their offer. Why? Because they couldn't figure out a legal means of trying him! But Clinton sure knew how to argue the meaning of is!
Everything was more important than fighting terrorism. Political correctness, civil liberties concerns, fear of offending the administration's supporters, Janet Reno's objections, considerations of cost, worries about racial profiling and, in the second term, surviving impeachment, all came before fighting terrorism. - Dick Morris, New York Post, Jan. 2, 2002
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clintonscandals
1
posted on
10/20/2002 10:03:55 AM PDT
by
repub32
To: repub32
"Perhaps if Clinton had kept his promises, over 3,000 people would be alive today." Clinton? Keep a promise? What planet is this writer from? Any politician is going to lie like a rug, but Clinton was especially good at lying, even accomplished career liars were impressed with his abilities. Expecting Clinton to keep a promise is like expecting the sun to rise in the West. Ain't gonna happen!
To: repub32
Is this all by Dick Morris? He was the architect of Clinton's campaigns in 91 and 95, and he knows where the bodies lay. He has also been the most honest critic of Bill and Hill since he left the White House in disgrace. I must assume he has an "insurance" package in a safe deposit box or buried somewhere, that spills many beans on the Clinton regime. He gets away with talking out of school, and has not been Arkancided.
Morris is one of those fascinating political creatures, I hate him for conniving to istall America's worst president, but I love him when he spills a few beans to partially soothe his conscience. He holds the key to correcting the historical record on the Clintons.
To: Billy_bob_bob
Perhaps, in a much larger way, this demonstrates that Democrats are just incapable of governing a nation. After all, if the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" was the best and brightest they could come up with, and when the opportunity presented itself, could not bring themselves to dismiss him for clear malfeasance of office, then they do not have the necessary depth of judgment to discharge the duties of high office. Not in the Executive Branch, not in the Legislative Branch and certainly not in the Judicial Branch. Yet they hang on, contributing nothing of value to the national dialogue, and preventing others from timely and wise actions on behalf of the American people. Has the Federal budget been passed? Only in part, the rest is subject to a continuing resolution. Have the vacancies on the various Federal court benches been filled? Certainly not. Do we have adequate means to address the concerns of domestic terrorism? Still unresolved in the Senate, hampered by a foolish consistency in playing to a small part of the Democrats' electorate.
But the Democrats sure are in touch with their inner feelings. But really, the national government should not be the place where they work out personal psychological problems.
To: repub32
Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. - yea he knew a Republican would be back in the White House someday!
To: alloysteel
"But really, the national government should not be the place where they work out personal psychological problems." But, but, then what is a national government for anyway? I just don't understand!
< / stupid democrat mode>
To: repub32
Never forget what little butt boy John Steponallofus said about the impeached president Clinton's promises...
"He kept every promise that he intended keep"
Nuff said.
Semper Fi
7
posted on
10/20/2002 11:07:25 AM PDT
by
river rat
To: repub32
And of course the GOP made a BIG issue about Clinton's inaction
Yeah right
8
posted on
10/20/2002 11:09:34 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: moodyskeptic
Morris is one of those fascinating political creatures, I hate him for conniving to istall America's worst president, but I love him when he spills a few beans to partially soothe his conscience.Dick Morris is the worst kind of snake - even worse than x42; he smiles in everyone's face then expects us to trust him?
He has so many conservatives fooled that it isn't funny. What he says is not gospel! Everything, and I mean everything, that comes out of his mouth is completely and totally self-serving. He doesn't give a damn about the conservative cause, even though he walks the walk and shows up on FNC to talk the talk.
We have no business and no reason to listen to his clap trap. Those of you that do and that believe him, are being fooled and have fallen for the ongoing trap he's got set. Don't you realize that he takes everything he hears and learns back to the DNC!?
9
posted on
10/20/2002 11:37:07 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: repub32
"Everything was more important than fighting terrorism."
10
posted on
10/20/2002 1:47:27 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: repub32
Yep Clinton did all those things, but it is a shame isn't it that it is all Bush's fault?
To: Billy_bob_bob
Expecting Clinton to keep a promise is like expecting the sun to rise in the West. Ain't gonna happen! But you know what? If Clinton got on TV and told people the Sun would come up in the western sky- there'd be millions of idiots out there facing the Pacific awaiting the New Dawn. The media would turn it into an all night orgy of the Promise of the New Age and pundits would trip and fall over themselves apologizing for why it didn't happen in the morning and the columnists would zing off stinging diatribes at the unfairness of planetary motions and Newtonian Physics and the Truly Vast Right Wing Conspiracy for denying the Big Dog his day in the sun.
To: mhking
I can never figure out why Fox and especially Sean Hannity keeps listening to this guy. What makes him a political expert? Oh wait, you have to be a liar, philanderer, and anti-intellectual. This guy new all the bad things the Clintons were going to do to this country and never said a thing. That makes him morally reprehensible. He makes predications about politics and no one ever calls him on his predictions... i.e. He said Hillary would not run for Senator, but for president.
To: Slyfox
"What a Great Picture Puzzle" BUMP!
14
posted on
10/21/2002 12:18:58 PM PDT
by
Pagey
To: repub32
From
Clinton
News
Network...
Bin Laden, millionaire with a dangerous grudge September 27, 2001
Snip...
In October 1993, 18 U.S. servicemen involved in the U.S. humanitarian relief effort in Somalia were killed during an operation in Mogadishu. One soldier's body was dragged through the streets.
Bin Laden was indicted in 1996 on charges of training the people involved in the attack (in Mogadishu, Somalia)
and in a 1997 interview with CNN, bin Laden said his followers, together with local Muslims, killed those troops."They" indicted him in
1996! for actions he committed in
1993!In 1996 the government of Sudan had Osama bin Laden in their custody and offered to hand him over to the United States.Snip...
Because they couldn't figure out a legal means of trying him!They sure found a way to indict him!
To: repub32
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson