Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witness may have given fake story about shooter, van, weapon
Associated Press

Posted on 10/17/2002 12:52:05 PM PDT by RCW2001

STEPHEN MANNING, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, October 17, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/10/17/national1512EDT0714.DTL

(10-17) 12:28 PDT (AP) --

ROCKVILLE, Md. (AP) -- A witness who described the Washington sniper, his cream-colored van and his assault weapon may have given a phony story, police said Thursday in a setback for investigators trying to catch the roving killer.

The announcement cast doubt on much of what the public thought it knew about the gunman who has terrorized the region for the past two weeks.

Fairfax County police Lt. Amy Lubas said the inaccurate account was exposed by checking it against that of several other witnesses.

Asked if the witness may have intentionally misled investigators, Montgomery County Police Chief Charles Moose, who is heading the investigation, at first said: "I'm moving forward." When asked the question again, Moose simply said, "Yes."

Lubas said police and state prosecutors are investigating to determine whether the witness should be charged.

Investigators had showed a certain optimism after the latest attack seemed to yield the best details yet about the killer. The killing of an FBI cyberterrorism analyst Monday night in a crowded Virginia parking lot was the only slaying so far in which people actually saw the shooting.

But Moose said there was no credence to the chief witness' description of the cream-colored van. And while he did not give the witness' exact description of the shooter, he chastised reporters for running reports that variously described the gunman as dark-skinned, olive-skinned, Middle Eastern or Hispanic.

"When we have people from the media interviewing witnesses and publishing reports, we get confusion," Moose said. "We get this noise ... out there that gives people tunnel vision and makes them focus in on things that are not appropriate. ... We would like to be able to do our job."

Moose said the witness' emphatic description of the shooter's AK-74 is also bogus. But investigators cautioned that they still believe the sniper is using one of a family of more than 30 similar assault-type weapons capable of firing a .223-caliber bullet.

"The message we're trying to say is please keep an open mind," Moose said. "People saw a description of a weapon over the last day and a half and we're convinced they eliminated people they know because they say, `Their gun is not the weapon I saw in the paper."'

Moose said the disclosure of the fake story, coming a day after investigators said they were unable to draw a composite sketch, was hardly a setback. He said investigators were still chasing leads and he stood by previous composite drawings of vehicles witnesses reported seeing leaving the attacks: a white box truck and a Chevrolet Astro van or Ford Econoline van.

Since Oct. 2, there have been 11 shootings in Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C., that have left nine people dead and two wounded. One of the wounded, a 13-year-old boy shot outside his school in Bowie, Md., was upgraded Thursday from critical to serious condition. The other wounded person, a woman in Virginia, was released from a hospital last week.

The victims were men and women of varying ages and ethnic backgrounds, each hit with a single bullet while going about everyday activities. A tarot death card left at one scene was inscribed: "Dear Policeman, I am God."

Law enforcement sources said the investigation by federal, state and local authorities has led to information about a number of people with high-powered guns, both legally and illegally owned.

A firearms safety instructor said the FBI has been asking registered owners of .223-caliber guns to bring them in for ballistic fingerprinting.

"They're looking for suspects," said Mike Heffernan, owner of Self Defense Technologies in Kensington. "They're looking at people who have a background in firearms, possess .223 weapons, and have the capability of using them."


On the Net:

Montgomery County police: www.co.mo.md.us

FBI: www.fbi.gov

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms: www.atf.treas.gov

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2002 12:52:05 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
A firearms safety instructor said the FBI has been asking registered owners of .223-caliber guns to bring them in for ballistic fingerprinting.

LOL!!! Yeh, Ok. And what does he mean by "registered"?

2 posted on 10/17/2002 12:55:18 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Moose said the witness' emphatic description of the shooter's AK-74 is also bogus.

I apologize for not being able to give proper credit where it is due, but there were a few folks here on FreeRepublic who recognized this "witness" as a fraud as soon as it was revealed that he had been able to identify the murder weapon as an AK-74. While the perp was hurrying to get out of there. At night.

3 posted on 10/17/2002 12:55:58 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Ping.
4 posted on 10/17/2002 12:56:34 PM PDT by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
And what does he mean by "registered"?

More importantly, what does he mean by "asked"?

5 posted on 10/17/2002 12:57:30 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"A firearms safety instructor said the FBI has been asking registered owners of .223-caliber guns to bring them in for ballistic fingerprinting.

"They're looking for suspects," said Mike Heffernan, owner of Self Defense Technologies in Kensington. "They're looking at people who have a background in firearms, possess .223 weapons, and have the capability of using them."

I sure hope the sniper falls for this one!

6 posted on 10/17/2002 12:58:36 PM PDT by ChuteTheMall GawdSortaMount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This begins to seem familiar. Oh yes, TWA800 witnesses were not credible.
7 posted on 10/17/2002 12:58:52 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If this guy was deliberately giving a phony story, he should be tied to a pump all night for a month at a busy-intersection gas station in DC.

Leni

8 posted on 10/17/2002 1:00:36 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"They're looking for suspects," said Mike Heffernan, owner of Self Defense Technologies in Kensington. "They're looking at people who have a background in firearms, possess .223 weapons, and have the capability of using them."

Hmmm... I think that perhaps he left something out here... Let's see now... Maybe it should read...

"They're looking for suspects," said Mike Heffernan, owner of Self Defense Technologies in Kensington. "They're looking at people White men who are not Middle-eastern who have a background in firearms, are registered Republicans, possess .223 weapons, and have the capability of using them."

There... That's better.

9 posted on 10/17/2002 1:01:19 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
looking for registered owners of .223 assault weapons

Do owners of rifles have to register their guns in MD and DC?

...they still believe the sniper is using one of a family of more than 30 similar assault-type weapons capable of firing a .223-caliber bullet

Well this certainly knocks the winds out of the sails of the "ballistic fingerprinting" crowd, doesn't it? After 11, eleven ballistic samples, they can't tell which one of 30 types of rifles the bullets were fired in? Then how could they possibly claim to be able to positively ID a specific, individually-owned weapon from a photo database using only one ballistic sample, which is all they would have after a crime if they were lucky? Answer: they could no more ID a rifle by "ballistic fingerprinting" than they can ID a white van from its moose tracks.

10 posted on 10/17/2002 1:01:57 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The witness should be prosecuted to the max if he is lying.
11 posted on 10/17/2002 1:02:06 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
from thefiringline.com http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=134951

The whole story
Yes cor-man, it has to do with the sniper shootings.

This evening about 8pm I got a call from a man who claimed to be an FBI agent surveying local gun owners (yeah right). Now this guy called me and started asking questions (I didn't answer BTW) about my lifestyle, what I've done this past week and about my guns. As some of you may know you should NEVER give out any kind of personal info to someone who calls you (too many scam artists out there). Also, I've never done anything wrong so why would the FBI call me? I assume it is someone trolling around until he finds someone willing to devulge info that will let him know who has guns worth stealing. I tell him this is who I think he is, so no I won't tell him about my guns (actually, I tell him I won't tell him IF I have guns, it is none of his business), my daily habits, my travels, etc. I tell him, that even if he is FBI I've done nothing illegal and so it is none of his buisness then either.

Then it gets really interesting. I dial " *69" to find the number he called from and then call the local FBI office to let them know that someone seems to be fraudulently identifing himself as FBI to get sensitive info about who owns guns (and their daily habits). I tell him the kinds of questions the guy asked (very aggressive- like he was trying to intimidate me) and the nice man at the local office told me it couldn't have been the FBI because, first they don't call people like that, and second they wouldn't use such tactics. I give him the number from *69- it is their Montgomery County MD task force ! I tell the guy that I may call back to apologize for my tone then, but I still won't tell him what guns I own or what I did this past week (it is still none of their business) to which he responds "I wouldn't either".

I call the office (though I don't have the agent's name) to find out who called me so I can apologize for my tone. The guy on the phone tells me that there are so many people there that there is no way he can figure out who it was without a name. I tell him the entire situation and he says "oh, wait, I think I know exactly who you talked to" "I'll have him call you back". A couple minutes later the phone rings and its the original guy (pissed as hell at me BTW).

I apologize for my previous tone, tell him that since I've never done anything wrong I couldn't imagine why the FBI would be calling me and reminded him that I had thought that it must have been someone trying to find out who owns what in the area to target homes. He tells me "Its a damn good thing you called. I had dispatched about a dozen local police and two ATF agents to your home."

I ask him how I came to his attention and why he is taking me so seriously (12 police and 2 ATF!!!). He tells me that "you've been buying an awful lot of guns lately haven't you" (btw, I have a fair #, but not like many here). I say that I have some guns but they are all legal so I still don't see the problem. I ask if he actually has a list of my guns (he does), how he got the list (won't tell me). I ask why he called (again). He won't tell me exactly but he then asks what I have been doing the past week. Now I'm getting REALLY mad (but I try to stay calm because I don't really want to go to jail). It becomes pretty clear in our conversatation that he somehow thinks I'm involved in the DC/MD/VA shootings . I then ask that if he has a list of my guns shouldn't he be able to tell that I don't own a .223, you know the round that the media has reported is the one being used. He tells me that many of my forms sent in by my FFLs were incomplete and didn't list the caliber (WHAT- who was the incompetent who sent the gov't an incomplete form and why is this the first I've heard about it, and I thought they weren't supposed to be used as registration/tracking/etc). Now he is clearly getting mad (and hinting that he won't call off the team he has coming for me). He DEMANDS to know what I've been up to the past week. I tell him that I've been home sometimes, at work sometimes, in Yeshiva sometimes and shopping sometimes (I know I shouldn't have said anything, but I'm tired, annoyed, a bit nervous, etc so I wasn't thinking straight). He then gets even angrier and threatens me with jail if I don't give him the answers he wants. I say it would help if he was more specific then. He asks where I was Fri morning (the time of the last shooting). I tell him I was at home. Now he's even madder (odd, I've just given him a specific answer like he wanted- once he gave a specific question). He wants to know if anyone can verify this (luckily my dad was home at the time- yes I currently live w/ my parents). He then ORDERS me to put my dad on the phone (luckily he was here) and tells me that if he doesn't verify my story exactly I should "be prepared to take a trip at around 11PM." My dad answers all his questions (incl. his birthday and why he was at home and not at work), I get the impression he was very hostile w/ my dad (he was shaking) and he kept telling my dad I have lots of guns (some of you may remember that my parents, esp. my dad, are strongly anti). Then they hung up.

12 posted on 10/17/2002 1:02:27 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If the witness saw an AK type weapon with an orange clip, it would be possible. Otherwise I agree with you. The problem is we are not privy to the testimony of the witness. We do not know if the witness said AK-74 or whether the police put it together.
13 posted on 10/17/2002 1:09:08 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Who was "he" Name, rank, serial number.
14 posted on 10/17/2002 1:12:00 PM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer; Route66; Peach; Bella; Pete; areafiftyone; brigette; harpseal; Merovingian; ...
maryland watch ping
15 posted on 10/17/2002 1:13:15 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
This is odd. Are they saying that the guy misled the investigators on purpose, as if he was helping the sniper?
16 posted on 10/17/2002 1:14:41 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
You've got a lot of self-control. When he asked me where I was on Friday morning, I would have told him, "Out with a couple of my guns, hunting for some @sshole who has been shooting people all over the D.C. area."
17 posted on 10/17/2002 1:14:50 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
He wouldn't survive the first night.
18 posted on 10/17/2002 1:18:53 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I hope they check this "witness" out very carefully, and all his friends as well. Wonder if this was part of the plot.
19 posted on 10/17/2002 1:19:43 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Witness may have given fake story about shooter, van, weapon

--------------------------

We need this like we need a second A-hole.

20 posted on 10/17/2002 1:21:34 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson