Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/08/2002 11:41:52 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
VP Cheney was just so eloquent on this show this morning. He is so impressive and just oozes with confidence.
There is so much more to this story, and it is coming out in leaps and bounds. I am sure we will know more when the President speaks to the UN.( Not that I feel he should have to.)
2 posted on 09/08/2002 11:47:10 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
and two key senators disclosed that U.S. officials have warned the Iraqi dictator that he and his country face "annihilation" if he deploys a weapon of mass destruction.

I don't even need to go any farther. PC is so run amuck, the general populace could not stomach wiping out an entire nation; even if it meant for the sake of it's own prosperity. We now live amongst a country of 50% cowards. Where's my proof? Look how many voted for Gore.

Note: I personally don't give two shit's about Iraq. If Iraq's dictator is building WMD "stuff", and Iraq's people wanna survive, better get rid of your dictator folks...Else, I full on support wiping out Iraq, "all of them"...

Why leave any wiggle room for another dictorial regime?

3 posted on 09/08/2002 11:47:48 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
W to Saddam: Try any crap with me and I'll turn Iraq into a giant sheet of glass labelled "New Texas".
4 posted on 09/08/2002 11:50:01 PM PDT by lawgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Bump


THIS is what our Nation is responding to.
Please remember this in the difficult times ahead.

Takes a while to load, but worth it!

Click here



5 posted on 09/08/2002 11:51:31 PM PDT by B-Cause
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Mr. Graham said it has "been conveyed to Baghdad" that using a weapon of mass destruction would result "not only in the annihilation" of Saddam, "but of much of his society."

This looks suspiciously like they are talking about the 'N' word, hopefully this will sober Sadam up, or at least his generals.

6 posted on 09/08/2002 11:51:48 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

As they say in Texas: Nuke 'em Horns.

7 posted on 09/08/2002 11:54:51 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I would guess that Hussein has opened up his entire treasury now to obtain whatever materials he needs to finish his nuke- the thing's been built already but needs the material. How hard can it be if you'll pay any price?

Given the language used here, it looks not only like Saddam may get a functional nuke if he gets more time, it looks like we're not so sure he has not already obtained it.

10 posted on 09/08/2002 11:56:50 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hopefully, we'll see nuclear-armed B52s executing figure-of-eights over Baghdad 24x7 once this thing heats up a bit.
26 posted on 09/09/2002 4:33:59 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
what country will he be hiding in when we bomb Iraq?
27 posted on 09/09/2002 5:01:12 AM PDT by justsomedude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Dis man, he do have de way wid woids!
32 posted on 09/09/2002 5:46:28 AM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"Specifically, he said, the United States has been able to "intercept and prevent" Saddam from acquiring a kind of aluminum tube "necessary to build a centrifuge."

Care to bet that the source of that tube was German?

39 posted on 09/09/2002 6:38:53 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Though some critics have challenged the legal right of the United States to make an unprovoked attack against Iraq to oust its leader

Where were all these critics when Bill Clinton was wagging the dog with an unprovoked attack on Belgrade to oust Milosevic. That attack was certainly the most blatant war crime I have seen in my life time, and I have yet to hear any serious condemnation of it.

46 posted on 09/09/2002 8:10:37 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I like his choice of words...

...(total) annihilation...
...(complete) annihilation of Saddam and of his society...
...extinction...
...(just)Imagine a September 11 with (NUCLEAR) weapons...
...we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud (on American Soil)...
"I don't know what more evidence we need"
"The danger of an attack against the United States by someone with the weapons Saddam Hussein now has or is acquiring is far more costly than what it would cost to go deal with the problem militarily."


...Very direct and unambiguous.


47 posted on 09/09/2002 8:12:58 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Europe should be paying more attention. We have a very, very credible MAD in place; anyone who doubts that Israel will retaliate needs his head examined. Who does that leave as a soft target?
48 posted on 09/09/2002 8:18:37 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"The United States "may well become the target," the vice president said."

Absolutely. He's after the US and Israel. He's also still after Iran, but I don't think at this juncture Iran'll be his first target.

60 posted on 09/09/2002 9:18:00 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

"Kill them, kill them all"

81 posted on 09/09/2002 11:18:14 AM PDT by semaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"There will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

The lady sure knows how to turn a phrase.

88 posted on 09/09/2002 1:35:34 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The answer should be annihilation regardless.
114 posted on 09/09/2002 5:15:10 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson