[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

Mr. Graham said it has "been conveyed to Baghdad" that using a weapon of mass destruction would result "not only in the annihilation" of Saddam, "but of much of his society."

This looks suspiciously like they are talking about the 'N' word, hopefully this will sober Sadam up, or at least his generals.

[andy_card]

This looks suspiciously like they are talking about the 'N' word, hopefully this will sober Sadam up, or at least his generals.

It really doesn't matter what Saddam does, as long as when push comes to shove, we've scared his generals such that should he push the proverbial button, nothing would happen.

[Mo1]

And todays word is .. "annihilation"

Do ya think they'll understand that??

[Monty22]

I am amused lately at the attacks against Saddam.. Reminds me of the Hitler has only 1 testicle stuff that went around during WW2.

Maybe both are true though, but anyway I love it when we slander our enemies' sexual abilities. You just know that ticks them off, like when serial killers are lampooned in the news.. Makes em nuts.

Is Cheney the last brave American? Seriously.. It seems like everyone is so SCARED now that they are frozen in place. Nobody wants to offend anyone hardly. Many people don't even like offending bin laden, much less Hussein.. Check out du.com to confirm.

[varon]

This looks suspiciously like they are talking about the 'N' word,

Something just dawned on me. Maybe it is the 'N' word that has our "allies" backpeddling from supporting us in the slapdown of Saddam. Perhaps behind the scenes our people have informed our "allies" that we will not have a protracted urban military campaign in Iraq because we will be going in with tactical nukes first, against the manufacturing facilities of WMD. That would explain also why we have such a low number of ground troops in the theater so near 'WhupAss' Day.