Posted on 08/14/2002 9:45:21 PM PDT by Pokey78
May I say something about Ann Coulter? She is a half-wit, a termagant, a dimwit, a blowhard, a worthless silicone nothing, physically ugly and could be likened to Eva Braun, who was Hitler's mistress. As it happens, these are all descriptions or characterizations Coulter uses for others in her book, "Slander." It ought to be called "Mirror."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
What the article proved is yet again, the left can dish it out but they can't take it. His argument that the majority of Presidents in the modern era have been Republicans cuts no ice. That's not what Ann was talking about; what she was talking about was how the media demonised anyone right of centre. And this she proved in spades. Whether the electorate swallows it is neither here nor there. The fact that Cohen thinks that the media is unbiased because the nation elects conservative presidents is laughable indeed. The nation elects conservative presidents because it rejects what the media has to say.
But the idea that the people in flyover country might not take what he says as Gospel never occured to him, I suppose.
Regards, Ivan
No, you may not. You're not fit company for humans.
May I say something about Ann Coulter? She is a half-wit, a termagant, a dimwit, a blowhard, a worthless silicone nothing, physically ugly and could be likened to Eva Braun, who was Hitler's mistress.
I understand your current twelve step program takes up much of your free time, but do at least try to come up with your own invective. "Silicone nothing"? Hardly. Perhaps this was a Freudian slip while you pondered your penile implant . . .
If, as Coulter says, liberals control the media and much of the animal and plant kingdoms, then how is it that the president du jour and others of recent times -- Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush the Elder -- happen to be conservatives? I must be missing something here.
Yes, my self-important little media shill, you are missing something. Liberal control of the media does not automatically mean Liberal control of the voters, no matter how much you wish it so.
For some reason, the intolerant National Review fired her.
Again sir, allow us to pretend you absorbed the book. The National Review dropped her syndicated column. This is still America; they are allowed to do so, much the same way I'm allowed to "fire" everyone in the Washington Post through my subscription cancellation. I would assume this qualifies me as intolerant from the Washington Post point of view . . .
Being conservative is like being criminally insane: You can't be held accountable.
Calm down, Mr. Cohen. I understand it must be quite a shock to personally suddenly realize the implications of the bestseller status of the book "Slander"; that the general public does not hold the same Liberal mindset you do. It's OK; the general public had felt this way for quite some time. Conservatives aren't suddenly going to capture and torture you because of your epiphany.
I mean, almost everything Coulter says about her ideological enemies could be said about her.
Everything Ann Coulter says about her ideological enemies HAS been said about her, by her ideological enemies, many times over, for many many years. The Richard Cohens of the world don't stop at Ms. Coulter; they include everyone who does not agree with the Liberal mindset. Why do you think she wrote the book?
See, Ann, liberals can be compassionate.
Yes, and this column is a fine example of that Liberal compassion.
Nah, Katie Couric may be a liberal butt-munch; but, I've seen any number of people willing to state she is pretty. It's her attitudes that are ugly. Liberals name call because they have nothing of worth to say that anyone would otherwise agree with in an actual exchange of ideas. That's why they're so terrified of conservatives and Fox News.
Must be nice having idiots like this representing your political beliefs?? It would probably help if he actually read the book rather than the bibliography, but he would probably wear out his lips by reading that much?? Ann Rox!!!
Pray for GW and the Truth
wink, wink, nudge, nudge
Sorry, libs, she's ours.
I know it's not Free Republically Correct to say so, but his is almost true...
Ann is fairly attractive (No where NEAR as "Hot" as the obviously biased posters on FR state) but her body is disgusting!!!
I LOVE a slim woman but Ann is Olive Oil Like! He thighs are almost literally as thin as her ankles...If that's not Olive Oil, I don't know WHAT is???
But still...She's about my favorite writer. An OUTSTANDING wit and good, basic insight into liberals. I wish she was as good on TV where she seems to stumble a bit too much.
I want to personally apologize to Ann Coulter on behalf of the Male Race for her having to be subjected to this disgusting diatribe by this mouthpiece from Hell.
I have this overwhelming desire to shower after perusing the column. I feel dirty simply from reading it . . .
A man who cannot spell "vinegar" is not intellectually qualified to pronounce upon the gender of Ann Coulter.
Ivan
You missed a couple (or maybe you're just going easy on him). It's "publicly", not "publically". And I believe the word is "entourage". ("And I get rub vinager"...who's "drooling"?)
Richard Cohen (Washington Post) Gets Kid-Gloves Treatment in Harassment Case
Richard Cohen is simply dirty...
SD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.