Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anatomy Of A Murder: Westerfield vs. Van Dams (A Mother's Story)
San Diego Online ^ | June 27, 2002 | Kevin Cox

Posted on 06/27/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Anatomy of a Murder
The disappearance of Danielle van Dam was a shocking tragedy that ballooned into more than just a murder case. The parents’ lifestyle—and actions by police, media, lawyers and the district attorney—came into question. As the legal team for defendant David Westerfield begins the fight for his life, here’s a no-holds-barred look behind the scenes of San Diego’s biggest story of 2002.
By Kevin Cox

Amid the superstores and strip malls that pass for community in the suburbs of San Diego, some small-town traditions remain. Parents still come out to watch their kids play Little League baseball, just like their parents did.

There’s sunshine and sunflower seeds. Dirt and grass.

But in the Carmel Mountain Ranch Little League, grass is a touchy subject this season. Parents have admitted smoking it, and one of them says a coach supplied it.

Grass. Marijuana, that is.

The coach is Rich Brady (not the well-known San Diego clothier with the same name). Some wanted Brady to resign, but others involved with his team threatened to pull their children out of the league if he left, according to a league official. Brady declined comment on the subject. The dispute went all the way to Little League headquarters in Williamsport, Pennsylvania.

The Carmel Mountain Ranch league was covering its bases, according to the league official. “The general consensus from everyone involved is unless the man is charged with something, and his performance on the field is affected by choices in his personal life, at this point there are no grounds to remove him,” the official says.

Rich Brady is still coaching, but “It’s one of those situations where we wish he would go away quietly,” says another coach.

And who is the parent who says Brady supplied marijuana?

Brenda van Dam.

The disappearance of her 7-year-old daughter, Danielle, set off a San Onofre–size chain reaction in San Diego on February 2. Three days later, Brenda and her husband, Damon, were on national television, pleading for Danielle’s return. They kept making pleas in daily news conferences before dozens of reporters and photographers outside their Sabre Springs home—with the man suspected of abducting their daughter just two doors away.

Police quickly focused on the neighbor, David Westerfield, as thousands of volunteers kept searching for Danielle. Twenty days after she disappeared, the cops arrested Westerfield, who pleaded not guilty to murdering her. It took five more days for searchers to find Danielle’s body, under a tree by a road in East County.

Westerfield’s murder trial—he faces the death penalty—was scheduled to start May 17. A judge imposed a gag order on most of the trial participants—including the van Dams, the police and the district attorney. San Diego Magazine offered each a chance to comment for this story. They either declined, citing the gag order, or did not respond.

The van Dams

Despite the reluctance of many in the media to explore the van Dams’ lifestyle choices, one thing is clear: The question of lifestyle—both the Van Dams’ and that of their neighbor, David Westerfield—is very likely to be a central issue in Westerfield’s murder trial. And it will be impossible for the media to ignore.

Looking back, Brenda van Dam called it a girls’ night out. That’s how she described an evening of drinking and dancing with her two girlfriends, on the same night her daughter disappeared. Brenda offered the following version of events that evening:

The three women met two men at a bar. Brady was one of them. They went back to the van Dam house about 2 a.m. Damon van Dam, who had remained home with Danielle and her two brothers, joined the group to eat leftover pizza. The pizza party broke up around 3 a.m., and the van Dams went to bed.

Later that morning, about 9 a.m., the van Dams discovered their daughter was missing.

In the days following Danielle’s disappearance, allegations about her parents’ lifestyle began to emerge. There was talk of spouse-swapping and drug use by the van Dams. It had the makings of a public relations nightmare.

“At that time, attention was starting to get diverted to allegations of family lifestyle,” says a spokeswoman for Fleishman Hillard, an international public relations and communications firm. A week after Danielle disappeared, four employees from the firm’s San Diego office started working with the van Dams as unpaid volunteers.

The spokeswoman says the van Dams needed help also because of the “news crush”—the sheer number of reporters now working the story—“and the fear other news [stories] would begin to override” the search for Danielle. “At that point, there was still a child missing,” she says. “That was the concern.”

The Fleishman Hillard employees worked with the van Dams for eight days, but the spokeswoman says the pair didn’t need any coaching. “In the media, there was a lot of second-guessing, a lot of speculation that the van Dams were heavily media trained. Frankly, that’s not true. They knew what they wanted to say; they knew where they wanted the attention to stay focused. We just helped them along.”

The spokeswoman has nothing but praise for the van Dams—as people and as parents. “I don’t know that I could have been that strong. I think their strength came from the belief they were doing the right thing in trying to find their daughter. I don’t think many people would have been as brave as the van Dams,” she says. “They were so selfless ... putting themselves through public scrutiny. They proved themselves to be ... good parents [who] do everything they can for their children. That’s exactly what they did.”

The public saw another side of the van Dams during David Westerfield’s preliminary hearing in March. That’s when Brenda described a previous girls’ night out—on January 25, a week before Danielle disappeared. On that night, Brenda testified, she saw Westerfield at Dad’s, a restaurant and bar in Poway, and he bought her alcohol. But she said she couldn’t remember how many drinks she had.

A week later, on February 1, Brenda testified, she, her husband and her two girlfriends smoked marijuana in the van Dam garage. Then the three women went back to Dad’s for their second girls’ night out in eight days. Westerfield was back at the bar, too. Brenda testified she and her two girlfriends smoked marijuana again that night in the parking lot at Dad’s—marijuana supplied by Rich Brady, the Little League coach.

Brenda acknowledged she told police her two girlfriends were dancing in a sexually provocative manner, rubbing their bodies together. One of the girlfriends, identified as Barbara Easton, tried to grab Brenda’s breasts, according to the statement Brenda gave investigators.

Westerfield’s attorney, Steven Feldman, pressed Brenda about her relationship with Easton. “Would you characterize Barbara Easton as an intimate friend of yours?” Feldman asked.

“What do you mean by ‘intimate’?” Brenda said.

“Very close ... sexually very close,” Feldman said.

The prosecution objected, and the judge ruled Brenda did not have to answer the question.

When Brenda and her friends came back to the van Dam house on February 1, Easton went upstairs to see Damon van Dam. Under questioning from Westerfield’s attorney, Damon admitted he initially withheld information from police about what he did with Easton. When he did provide details, he acknowledged telling investigators that Easton got in bed with him. Later during the same hearing, he testified he and Easton kissed and he rubbed her back while he lay in bed—but she was on top of the covers.

The Media

Every few years, San Diego hits a lottery no one wants to win. Something really bad happens, and it makes national news. Heaven’s Gate. Santana High. Danielle van Dam.

She was reported missing at the start of the February ratings period, when TV stations measure audiences to determine advertising rates. There were no other big national stories in early February. There was no news from Afghanistan. The Olympics hadn’t started. Enron had already been imploding for a while.

“It’s a pretty sensational story,” says Mike Stutz, news director for KGTV (Channel 10). “It certainly generated tons of interest. We saw it in the numbers [ratings]. There were different approaches in terms of how the van Dams’ personal life was reported. We stayed away from getting into that, not knowing if it had anything to do with the actual crime itself.”

At an April 27 Society of Professional Journalists seminar, held on the campus of Point Loma Nazarene University to examine the van Dam coverage, Stutz and KNSD (Channel 7/39) news director Jim Sanders defended their decisions to not air information about the family’s lifestyle. Sanders says he confirmed lifestyle reports from two credible sources, but chose not to air the information “unless the police department told us it was relevant to the case.”

Stutz says ratings had nothing to do with way the story was covered. “[But] it’s nice to have ’em come along,” he says. “I didn’t approach it [as] ‘Okay, we gotta get a big number here, let’s have more Westerfield.’”

But there was a missing girl—wearing a choker and a 7-year-old’s smile.

The national networks had their angle. Grieving parents make great television, news professionals say. And those news pros believe the networks go easy on the lifestyle aspect. Shaking her head and looking down, Diane Sawyer seemed barely able to ask the question about the “rumors” when she interviewed the van Dams via satellite on Good Morning America.

The networks, according to insiders, don’t want to ruin their chances for any future access to the van Dams—such as that big sit-down interview—once the trial’s over. So they “make nice” with them, in the words of one producer who made a special trip to San Diego for that very reason.

The tabloids were in town as well, and they had their angle. Danielle was the new JonBenet Ramsey. The two had a lot in common. They were cute little girls, both from relatively affluent neighborhoods, and TV stations across the country played home video of them incessantly.

Who can forget the images of JonBenet performing in that cowboy outfit? And who can forget those images of Danielle playing to the camera, being a happy 7-year-old?

The tabloids played up the van Dams’ lifestyle, too. But the local media, with the exception of radio talk show host Rick Roberts, didn’t talk very much about that. Instead, they were making some bizarre comments about the case.

On the air, KUSI (Channel 51) reporter Paul Bloom said he was “not allowed to think about” certain aspects of the investigation. San Diego Magazine asked Bloom what he meant. “As a journalist,” he says, “I’m not allowed to speculate, or think that way at all.” Bloom adds he was happy with the way he covered the story. “Every day of the week there was a new rumor ... new speculation. There was no confirmation that it had anything to do with Danielle’s disappearance.”

Instead of questioning the van Dams’ lifestyle, the local media went with one of its favorite angles—fear. “[It’s] Polly Klaas redux,” KUSI’s John Soderman told viewers, referring to the Northern California girl abducted at home and murdered by a stranger in 1993.

The media didn’t know if that was the case. David Westerfield was no stranger to the van Dams. Brenda and her daughter even went to Westerfield’s house a few days before she disappeared—to sell Girl Scout cookies. Westerfield bought one box of Thin Mints from Danielle and her mother, according to her testimony in court. During that visit, Brenda testified that she asked to go inside Westerfield’s house to look at his remodeled kitchen, while Danielle went in the backyard to look at the pool.

Danielle van Dam wasn’t another Polly Klaas.

In an interview with San Diego Magazine, Soderman defends his Polly Klaas analogy. “Basically, if Westerfield did it, you still have somebody in your neighborhood who scooped up your child,” he says.

“I think [readers and viewers] were frightened needlessly,” says Dean Nelson, founder and director of the journalism program at Point Loma Nazarene University. “I’m not ready to demonize [the media], but I wish they were more skeptical.”

The media have a tough job, Nelson says, because they can’t be too skeptical, either. “Let’s say something else happened, and a warning could have served the public well ... Police say ‘Lock your doors,’ and the media say, ‘Oh, that’s bogus, they’re just buying time.’”

But the police were clearly buying time following Danielle’s disappearance, according to Nelson. “The police knew this was not a stranger,” he says. “I don’t fault the police department, because they knew that was going to be a temporary fear, because they knew who they wanted: ‘Now we can all breathe easier. Okay, it was somebody down the street, so I guess it wasn’t a stranger after all.’”

The Police

At 2:30 in the morning on February 5, homicide investigators from the San Diego Police Department are standing outside David Westerfield’s house, preparing to go inside and search it. Sergeant Bill Holmes is one of the cops.

“Sergeant Holmes, what are you doing here?” a reporter asks.

“We’re here to relieve robbery,” he says. Robbery detectives had also been assigned to Danielle’s case.

“At 2:30 in the morning? That’s some pretty high-priced talent.”

Holmes smiles. “That’s the way they want it,” he says.

Over the next several hours, Holmes and his crew search Westerfield’s house. It’s easy to track their progress. They take dozens of pictures before dawn, and the flash from the camera lights up the windows in each room.

“Sergeant Holmes, you weren’t here to relieve robbery,” the reporter says to him when he comes outside.

Holmes smiles again. “Well, we were. Kinda. Sorta.”

Police arranged to have search warrants in the case sealed by the court, so the media couldn’t find out what investigators took from Westerfield’s home. It was an extraordinary effort to keep the information confidential. And it was a spectacular failure.

Sources close to the investigation started talking about the van Dams’ lifestyle almost immediately. Then came reports of blood in Westerfield’s motor home, and child pornography on his computer.

The cops were furious, according to those same sources. The police department threatened to fire anyone who talked about the case. “They were after the leaks,” a source says.

Police acknowledge being angry over the leaks. “Yeah, we were pissed off,” says Steve Creighton, an assistant chief. But he says the leaks did not result in any large-scale internal investigation. “It’s not even a blip on the radar screen.”

Two police detectives, Michael Ott and Mark Keyser, made big news for the department when they arrested Westerfield. Then they made news again, in a rather embarrassing way. Ott and Keyser attempted to visit Westerfield in jail—without his attorney present. The police department reportedly reprimanded them.

Westerfield’s legal team started hammering Ott and Keyser, saying they had repeatedly violated Westerfield’s rights during the investigation. The lawyers released a memo from the district attorney’s office saying the two detectives made false statements during another murder investigation two years ago. Westerfield’s lawyers used that memo in a legal maneuver

to review the personnel files of Ott, Keyser and 10 other police officers involved in the case for any reports of misconduct during their careers. Judge William Mudd ruled the defense could have information from the file of one unidentified officer.

“I think it’s safe to say Ott and Keyser are the Mark Fuhrmans of the Westerfield trial,” says a court insider, referring to the rogue cop vilified by the defense in the O.J. Simpson case.

The pressure of such a high-profile investigation was getting to the cops. “The detectives are sick of it,” a source says. Others say there were even references to the case as “The Isle of the van Damned.”

Creighton says he had not heard the detectives were sick of the case. “But they’re tired,” he says. “It’s a long and involved case, with a lot of long hours.”

The San Diego Police Department continued to handle the case with the utmost of care. Chief David Bejarano himself went to the van Dams’ home to meet with the family when Danielle’s body was identified. Then he talked to reporters. But at a follow-up news conference downtown, it wasn’t the police chief running the show.

It was District Attorney Paul Pfingst, who is running for reelection.

The District Attorney

The timing was interesting. Just four days before the primary election, Pfingst appeared on live television, talking about one of the biggest developments in the case yet. He thanked the volunteers who worked so hard to find Danielle. He expressed the emotions felt by law enforcement and everyone else in San Diego over the murder of a 7-year-old girl.

Politicians live for moments such as this, especially politicians who have not been getting good media coverage. Pfingst’s opponents had been relentlessly criticizing him, pointing out ethical lapses and declining morale in his office. But all that was getting pushed aside by news about Danielle—delivered by the district attorney himself.

“He was doing it for one reason only—that is, for the election,” says Deputy District Attorney Dave Stutz, a longtime critic of Pfingst. “He was grandstanding and campaigning. He took advantage of free press during a campaign. Once again, it shows he makes his decisions based on politics.”

Citing the gag order imposed on everyone involved with David Westerfield’s trial, a spokeswoman in the district attorney’s office says Pfingst won’t comment—not even to deny Stutz’ accusations. But Pfingst’s former spokeswoman, Gayle Falkenthal, comes to his defense.

“I can’t believe anyone in their right mind would think that Paul Pfingst wished this case into being, just for an election,” says Falkenthal, now the vice president of marketing and communications for the San Diego Convention Center Corporation. Because charges had already been filed against Westerfield, she says, the district attorney’s office was in charge of the case —not the police. So it was appropriate for Pfingst to take over the news conference, according to Falkenthal.

“In my opinion, if the district attorney had really wanted to grandstand, he could have handled [Westerfield’s] arraignment himself, he could have been at the courthouse every day, he could have been at the parents’ home,” she says. “He didn’t do any of that. There were lots of opportunities. He didn’t do any of them.”

Pfingst is in a runoff in November with the runner-up in the primary, Superior Court Judge Bonnie Dumanis. Westerfield’s trial may be a factor in the election.

It’s heavy stuff. Careers could be on the line. Reputations may be damaged. Lives have been changed forever. Those are the big themes, playing out before a national audience.

But the case also shows up in small ways, in everyday conversation in Sabre Springs, where Danielle lived. A neighbor tells a story about planning a party. He calls to invite his friends who live in other parts of the city. “What kind of party?” they ask. “A wife-swapping party?”

His neighborhood now has a new nickname: Sabre Swings.

Undeserved or not, such has been the fallout. But is the van Dams’ lifestyle relevant in the Westerfield trial? That’s a question that was finally left for a judge to decide. 

 


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 701-719 next last
To: goldenstategirl
I'm glad you're still here..so since you are, I'll start posting to you again.. I've missed you!
361 posted on 06/28/2002 6:32:33 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I think he's going after witnesses who have changed their stories. He's gone after SDPD for the way they handled certain aspects of this case and rightly so. We still have a couple of weeks left.

What are we gonna do when this is over?

362 posted on 06/28/2002 6:34:06 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Check the enquiring minds page there are alot of questions. If there's a question or comment you'd like to add, let me know. Stealth Ninja Dave
363 posted on 06/28/2002 6:36:31 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
It may not be our business because of the nature of the "event", however if she was killed in DW's house or the RV, it would be relevant in that it would prove that's where she was killed. I don't think a plastic sheet would have solved this problem, nor do I think David would have gotten one for this reason depending on which motive you want to go with. IMO.
364 posted on 06/28/2002 6:40:28 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber; UCANSEE2
Two pieces of testimony stick in my mind....

The girls started home from Dad's, remembered Barb's cigarettes, went back to get them, got home after Rich and Keith. With all of the stuff they 'forgot' or seem to have fabricated, why is this so consistent? (Other than the obvious, "that's what happened!" Think outside the box for a moment, please.)

The ME found no marks on the body, and the teeth were not traumatically knocked out of the gums, so I think that would rule out getting hit by a car.

What if the pizza party folks ARE into other things than 'swapping'? (Denise and Brenda both waltzed to the perjury line to deny group sex.) What if Danielle knew and spilled the beans somewhere? Could that be the reason behind the journal entry? What if they had to shut her up in the wee hours of Saturday morning?

If they were playing with LE muckety mucks, that would explain the quick dismissal of VDs as suspects. It would also account for BVD and DVD's missing appropriate reactions to situtations continually. They're having to think about what regular parents would do, rather than just BEING greiving, angry, upset parents.

I realize I'm accusing them of unspeakable behaviors as parents, but it's one of the few scenarios I can think of that accounts for testimonies and attitudes on the witness stand, and for the manufactured, but flimsy, evidence that was presented against Westerfield.

Have at it! :-)

365 posted on 06/28/2002 6:43:29 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Doesn't it seem odd that she only bled on the left cuff of more that one item strewn about the floor? Wiping what ever is bleeding with her left wrist, perhaps.
366 posted on 06/28/2002 6:46:37 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Interesting conflict in testimony between Pizza Guy's and Gal's--

Both Keith and Rich testified that they all traveled together. They were following girls as the girls pulled in to driveway. The guy's parked in front of the house and that they all went in the house together.

---Never had to wait for girls to get back--
367 posted on 06/28/2002 7:02:43 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Get got the economy size and already had a refill.
368 posted on 06/28/2002 7:03:13 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Does anyone know the skinny on this journal Danielle was supposed to be keeping.

I once tried to find out about silver journals at Barnes and Noble's website. They described one as a journal of black pages that you write in with silver ink. It's supposed to be real popular with kids who are into the "Lord of the Rings" type wizard stuff.
369 posted on 06/28/2002 7:24:03 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Ooohhh, I forgot about that. This suggests that there IS a reason the girls made that point.

Had they agreed earlier on that, and the guys forgot the 'story?' Or was there back and forth travel other times from Dad's during the evening, and that would provide them cover, counting on some confusions about time?

I'm waiting to hear Feldman's take on the Dad's story. I think it is a crucial part of the story.

If DW was the only obviously guilty person, why would the DA even tell the story of the VDs on Friday night in such detail? Why not put on witness saying what was going on with DW earlier on Friday?

There's been so little testimony about DW before the 'incident'. And such focus on what he did afterwards. Perhaps after hair, lint, fibers were planted in his house/garage accessed by an open door (accident or B&E?). How come there was so much fiber and hair to connect to the victim, but no blood, feces, urine, fingerprints in the house? How would someone pull off an abduction/molestation/murder in one's home with a teenage son in and out all weekend? And how come we didn't hear any testimony from that perspective?

370 posted on 06/28/2002 7:28:33 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
If you try to not relate, you'll see the oddness. Yeah, we've all had our moments, but when you point out what what you ''didn't'' do..from saving/collecting and enjoying child pornography that depicts savage violence (that's what it is), to hanging out at bars all night while married, and being a loner that might think kids are less intimidating or judgemental, there's something not right about it. I agree rejecting organized religion is not uncommon. Does it mean he is an atheist? Does it mean he still is a God believing soul who nurtures his spirituality? Does it mean he is conveniantly ignoring God so he can continue his sick behaviour? While I think his mom has some issues.. (*ie, why would she publicly say those things?), unless she is an habitual liar..she's brought some insight that we wouldn't have had. We'd still be hearing what a wonderful guy he was..had patents, and a great career. Also, I'd like to know if it's true whether he really had adult or kid parties at his house..so far, we've not had neighbors to confirm or deny..
371 posted on 06/28/2002 7:34:40 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
According to reports, DW (the horndog) has changed points in his story as well. I'd sure like to know whether DW will be put up on the stand..but me thinks he won't. Rebuttle witnesses and testimony will be interesting...the last words the jury will hear will be duseks...unless dusek desides to not split his closing arguments.

What'll we do afterwards? Replace our keyboards for one thing..I can't see the letters on a couple of mine. :)

372 posted on 06/28/2002 7:47:36 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
LOL I can't see the letters on a couple of mine. :) should have read I can't see a couple of letters on mine. I need coffee!!!
373 posted on 06/28/2002 7:49:49 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
I think the he said /she said conflicts on details are part of their cover and they probably will get away with,
because they were SOOOOOOO - --HIGH!!!!!! How convient.

They could have traveled over to DW while they were in the parking lot, getting SOOOO HIGH. While DW was in the bar, and they knew DW was in while they were outside.

The DA is using them as quantatative witness, not qualatative their -power-(for lack of better word)is that he has four witness that are not related to the family, that testify to the whereabouts and activities of the Vandam's during the majority of the time.

However, this does not help Damon who had a four hour window of opportunity to do the deed, or set up the deed.
374 posted on 06/28/2002 7:57:32 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: jacquej; RnMomof7
Personally, I think Westerfield is guilty as sin.....he had not only lots and lots of child pornography in his house, I believe he has a history child molestation...

But the authorities have to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt, that is the legal standard...can they? Who knows? I remember OJ...

375 posted on 06/28/2002 8:05:59 AM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; cyncooper; BunnySlippers; All
Courttv just displayed the necklace Danielle was wearing on an evidence bag.. I missed that during live testimony. It had her hair, sticks and debri stuck in it.. That was horrible..
376 posted on 06/28/2002 8:10:06 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
They're either four witnesses, or four accomplices, depending on how this plays out, I guess.

I can't quite bring myself to believe it, but several times during testimony, it seemed uncanny that Brenda took Danielle to DW's at just the right time to provide opportunity to spread 'contaminants' that could damn him later. And she is the one who pointed the police at him. I wonder when she did decide to pin this on him.... before Friday, or sometime on Saturday? Was it opportunity on her part, or forethought?

But it's too hard to postulate that she knew what was coming.

I wish I could believe that the VDs were distraught, but their behavior has just been so calculating -- What's been happening in court, the new car, the re-do on the house. Is Danielle's room now cleaned out, with new paint and carpeting and turned into a home office or playroom? It wouldn't surprise me.

DVD's testimony about the gate across the door screamed at me that all the evidence of what happened to her was somewhere else. He was sure of that, he could afford to keep the room. I'm a believer in cremation, but I think I'd wait to cremate my child's body until I knew her killer was convicted, just in case. The VDs certainly have the right to make whatever arrangements they like, but I know I'd do differently.

I'm watching to see how Feldman deconstructs the 'Loaves and Fishes' pizza, and the world's biggest joint. These folks weren't temperate about anything in their lives. Denise's and Branda's cockiness in the stand will come back to bite both of them, I'm sure.

I hope the boys are safe. Their Guardian Angels must be exhausted!

377 posted on 06/28/2002 8:11:05 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
Have you read the article covering dw's mother's interview? What do you think? The dad and dw were horndogs, dw was a loner who partied all night at bars while married, brother was openly gay and died of aids. Sounds like dad might have been abusive or at least negligent and there was the problem of alcohol.
378 posted on 06/28/2002 8:12:31 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: KLT
...he had not only lots and lots of child pornography in his house, I believe he has a history child molestation...

In the trial it was specified that there were 85 pictures that were questionable out of 8000. While even 1 is too many, it is not lots and lots. Some of the pictures shown in court Tuesday afternoon were downloaded on his son's computer. I realize that this doesn't fit the story, but these be the facts.

He has NO HISTORY of child molestation anywhere. The girls who have lived under his roof have been interviewed by police and stated that he showed no interest in them.

379 posted on 06/28/2002 8:12:44 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Did the mom's interview carry any weight with you? Did it make you think to yourself..well hey, the VD's aren't the only one's with problems here? I gotta lot of things to do today...shopping etc. Will see ya when I get back.
380 posted on 06/28/2002 8:14:01 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 701-719 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson