Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anatomy Of A Murder: Westerfield vs. Van Dams (A Mother's Story)
San Diego Online ^ | June 27, 2002 | Kevin Cox

Posted on 06/27/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-719 next last

(06-26-2002) - Death Penalty Would Mean Loss of Second Son

By David Gotfredson, LOCAL 8 News

It may be impossible to imagine the range of emotions a mother goes through following the death of a son. But at the age of 69, Laura Nan Westerfield is facing the possibility of going through that painful experience a second time.

Laura Westerfield’s youngest son, Earl Edson Westerfield, died of AIDS at the age of 36. Now her first born, 50-year-old David Westerfield, is facing the possibility of a death sentence in one of the most heinous crimes in San Diego County history: the kidnapping and murder of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam.

Laura Westerfield lives alone in a one-bedroom apartment behind the walls of a gated, senior complex in Clairemont. An avid reader of novels, Ms. Westerfield fancies herself an amateur sleuth.

“I love to read mystery novels. It used to take me until the final two chapters to guess who did it. Now, I can guess before I’m halfway through. There’s always something that gives you a clue,” she recently commented.

But, when it comes to the real-life mystery of her son’s murder case, Laura Westerfield has no clues. Asked about possible psychological events in David Westerfield’s childhood that could lead him to cold-blooded murder, Ms. Westerfield responded, “There’s nothing.”

“He didn’t cut off puppy dog tails. He never hurt anybody in all his life,” she said.

Confronted with the pile of evidence in the murder of Danielle van Dam, Ms. Westerfield alternates between defending her son and disbelief.

“I am predisposed to the fact that he did not do this. (David) wouldn’t do something like that.”

“What happened? Can somebody tell me what happened? How could he have possibly done it? I did the best I could. He’s a great person. I have no idea how the hell it happened. Something happened to him.”

Of the van Dam family, Ms. Westerfield says she understands their pain.

“I should know how awful it is to lose a child,” she said. “When Danielle first went missing, I cried for the mother. Poor little girl, I would have loved to hug her.”

David Alan Westerfield is the oldest of three children. His sister, Tania Pecina, lives in Clairemont in the same house where she and her siblings were raised from the time they were teenagers. Pecina has three children: one from a previous marriage and two by her present husband. Westerfield’s brother Earl, the middle child in the family, was openly gay and died of AIDS in 1990.

The family was aware of Earl Westerfield’s sexual preference from the time he was a young boy, according to his mother. “I started noticing there was something different about Earl about the time he was five years old,” she said.

Earl Westerfield’s infection with HIV, which he contracted from a longtime companion, eventually led to his hospitalization. The Westerfield family supported him financially through a series of costly treatments until his death at an Oceanside hospice called Fraternity House.

“I hugged Earl the day before he died. I wrapped my arms around him and he was just bones. I told him he could die. He asked me if it would be okay and I said yes,” recalled Ms. Westerfield. “It was a hard time for the family.”

David Westerfield was not overly distraught by his brother’s passing, according to Ms. Westerfield. “Alan was close to his brother, but he dealt with it,” she said. (In conversation, Laura Westerfield refers to her son by his middle name, Alan, because his father was also named David).

Ms. Westerfield’s late husband, David Horatio Westerfield -- who died in 1993 of colon cancer -- served as a lawmaker in the Maine House of Representatives in 1961. He and Laura Westerfield divorced when “Alan” was 26.

David H. Westerfield graduated in 1949 from Point Loma High School and attended San Diego State University for three and a half years. He studied archeology but never received a degree.

“He never did quite make it. He didn’t think it was important,” Ms. Westerfield said of her late husband.

Preferring artistic endeavors, David H. Westerfield held a variety of jobs during his time in San Diego, including landscape architect, still photographer, portrait artist and magazine layout editor. Laura Westerfield herself also worked for a number of years doing layout and editing for Dicta, a San Diego law magazine.

Ms. Westerfield describes her son’s relationship with his father as normal, although she admits her late husband was authoritative, if not strict. “Well, I wouldn’t say strict, but he wouldn’t give you more than two or three chances to do what he said,” she remembered.

David H. Westerfield filed for divorce in 1978, although it was Laura Westerfield who first left home. “I finally got out of that situation after 25 years of being subjugated,” she said.

“We grew apart. In fact, I was bored – empty nest syndrome. It wasn’t very difficult, just one of those things that had to happen.”

“I ran away from home. I left him the house. I left him his daughter. Both the boys were gone. They moved out of the house when they were 18. That was the rule of the house. When you’re 18, you move out. You’re old enough to look after yourself. And Alan was. He was old enough at 14.”

“We supported (the children) as best we could when they moved out. Set them up in apartments. I had been saving some money for them. All the things moms do.”

Regardless of the problems in her marriage, Ms. Westerfield insists there was never any physical or sexual abuse within the family, and certainly none involving her son “Alan.” She describes the family unit as close during David Westerfield’s childhood.

“We talked about everything under the sun at the dinner table. It was a rule. You had to be there at six o’clock every day.”

David Alan Westerfield spent most of his life in San Diego County. Born in National City’s Paradise Hospital in 1952, he lived with his parents and siblings in Point Loma and Clairemont until he was five. That’s when the family moved to Maine, where they stayed for 11 years, according to Ms. Westerfield.

At the age of 15, David Westerfield returned with his family to Clairemont – his mother is a San Diego native – and attended Madison High School where he graduated with the Class of 1970.

Laura Westerfield says her son tried out for football at Madison High but left the team after playing just one game. She says “Alan” became upset with the coaches and players for what he perceived as poor sportsmanship.

“The coaches wanted the players to (hit) the opposing players with known injuries. Alan was disgusted by this and told me he didn’t want to play football anymore,” she said.

On another occasion, Ms. Westerfield remembers her son getting into a fight with one of the other football players and punching him in the face.

Ms. Westerfield says her son was not exceedingly popular at school. “He was the biggest square you’ve ever seen,” she recalled, using her fingers to outline the shape of a box. Asked whether her son ever smoked marijuana, Ms. Westerfield said, “Not that I know of. Alan was just too square.”

A neighbor who lived across the street from the Westerfields for three decades described David Westerfield during his teenage years as a loner. “He was a very quiet, private person. You couldn’t get two words out of him,” the neighbor said. “I don’t think he had any friends at school ever.”

Classmates describe David Westerfield as being involved in math and engineering clubs, though his high school senior yearbook does not list him as a member of any social, athletic or academic group.

After graduating high school, Westerfield attended Mesa College for three years, and worked at Saska’s restaurant in Mission Beach during the early 1970s, his mother said.

Madison High School was also the place where David Westerfield met his first wife, Deborah Kyle. They were high school sweethearts. The two married in 1973, when Westerfield was 21 and Kyle was 19. They were married for six years and had no children before divorcing in 1979. Kyle now lives in Rancho Penasquitos.

Eight months after his divorce, Westerfield married Jackie Neal in December of 1979. He was 27; she was 21. Eventually, the couple had two children, Lisa and Neal Westerfield. (Neal’s first name also is David but he goes by his middle name.)

“Alan was a good father to his children,” according to Ms. Westerfield. “He hugged his son. Something I could never get his father to do.”

During his 17-year marriage to Jackie Neal, David Westerfield’s career as a design engineer developed. He worked for several North County companies before creating his own business in 1995, Spectrum Design.

Westerfield currently holds three U.S. patents: one for a surgically implanted knuckle prosthesis, another for a continuous passive motion device used in knee surgery rehabilitation, and a third for a metal pulley. Friends say he also designed the mechanism for a popular line of electric garage door openers.

Sources close to the family described Westerfield as a demanding husband who enjoyed a party lifestyle, often returning home in the early hours of the morning. He and his wife Jackie Neal separated in July of 1995. She filed for divorce three months later and the dissolution became final in June of 1996. The couple received joint custody of their two children, now ages 21 and 18. Lisa and Neal Westerfield live with their mother in Poway and attend college.

In recent years, David Westerfield’s drinking and womanizing became more prevalent, according to his mother. These traits he apparently had in common with his father.

“Alan’s a horn dog. That’s what my daughter calls him. She called her father that, too,” said Ms. Westerfield. “I think Alan taught his father a few things about (womanizing). They would go out together after the divorce.”

On March 2, 1996, San Diego Police arrested David Westerfield for the first time. An officer noticed Westerfield “weaving from side to side” on Northbound Interstate 15 near Highway 52. Westerfield did poorly on a field sobriety test and was booked into jail with a blood alcohol level almost twice the legal limit.

The DUI appears to be David Westerfield’s only criminal conviction and it came as a complete surprise to his mother.

“Alan never drank. Never. That’s why this whole last year is so out of character. He had a DUI. Ick!”

Court records show that Laura Westerfield has two drunken driving convictions of her own, one from 1983 and one from 1990. In 1991, Ms. Westerfield also was convicted of driving on a suspended driver’s license, according to court records.

David Westerfield purchased his home on Mountain Pass Road in Sabre Springs in June of 1996, according to property records. (The van Dams moved into the neighborhood two years later.)

In October of 1998, a woman Westerfield had been dating for about two months moved into his Sabre Springs home with her two children from a previous marriage, a boy and a girl ages 14 and 11 respectively. Tamera Weibrecht apparently was engaged to Westerfield for a short time but the relationship did not last long. Weibrecht and her two children moved out nine months later because of Westerfield’s “party lifestyle,” according Weibrecht’s present husband Jim Graves.

“He liked to party, but at some point that gets pretty old. At some point you have to give that up and settle down,” said Graves. “That’s what Tamera wanted to do. She also had an interest in religion and (Westerfield) didn’t want anything to do with religion.”

Weibrecht had no comment regarding her domestic relationship with Westerfield, which ended in 1999. Graves says police officers have spoken with both of the children and there is no evidence of any sexual abuse involving Westerfield and Weibrecht’s kids.

In 2000, Westerfield found himself living with another woman in virtually the same scenario.

Susan Lelek met Westerfield at the Big Stone Lodge in Poway and dated him for about three months before moving into Westerfield’s Sabre Springs home with her 15-year-old daughter and 9-year-old son. The relationship lasted about a year until the couple “grew apart,” said Lelek.

Lelek recently defended Westerfield during an interview in Mira Mesa, where she is now living with her children. Lelek says photographs taken by Westerfield in his backyard of her teenage daughter lounging in a bikini poolside were not sexual in nature.

Police officers found the photos on a computer disk in Westerfield’s office. Prosecutors entered the images into evidence at the preliminary hearing, as well as Westerfield’s criminal trial.

Lelek insists the photographs were “blown way out of proportion” by the prosecution. “Those were just a few of hundreds of photographs David took by the pool during barbeques with his children and their friends,” Lelek said.

“Yes, the towel was over her face. Yes, her legs were spread, and the angle was sort of looking up, and her hand was in a strange position, but that’s just the way teenagers act sometimes. It was totally innocent.”

Laura Westerfield was unaware that her son had lived with either Lelek or Weibrecht. David Westerfield apparently maintained a distant relationship with his mother. Ms. Westerfield recalled that her son had sent her a Christmas card each year.

“I did not see Alan a lot over the past year,” said Ms. Westerfield. “I saw him at Tania’s house. But I didn’t ask about his lifestyle in any way, shape or form. It was none of my business. When your kids get older, you don’t ask a lot.”

Westerfield never visited his mother’s apartment either. “I knew where he was. He knew where I was,” Ms. Westerfield said. “We spoke on the telephone.”

Ms. Westerfield first discovered her son had been arrested as a suspect in the van Dam kidnapping from television news reports, though she claims she had a premonition something was happening with her son the night Danielle went missing.

“Alan and I have a connection,” she said.

The news was devastating.

“You can’t imagine how much it hurts. I’ve cried until my eyeballs are poking out,” Ms. Westerfield said.

“How would you feel? I turn on the television every day and there’s my son, ‘the murderer.’ ”

Ms. Westerfield had no contact with her son following his arrest until the first day of his preliminary hearing on March 11, 2002. She attended the hearing in person – after taking three buses to the downtown courthouse – making eye-to-eye contact with her son in open court.

During a break in the hearing, a member of the defense team approached Ms. Westerfield and whispered something to her.

The attorneys apparently wanted Ms. Westerfield to understand that jailhouse deputies read mail before it is delivered to inmates. They did not want Ms. Westerfield writing anything confidential in correspondence to her son.

Laura Westerfield since has written one letter to her son in jail. He did not reply. They have not spoken on the telephone and Ms. Westerfield has no plans to visit him behind bars. “I’m waiting for him to contact me,” she said.

If it turns out David Westerfield is found guilty of the special circumstance of murder during the course of a kidnapping, relatives likely will be called to testify on his behalf during the penalty phase of the trial. Ms. Westerfield says she will not be in attendance.

Instead, she will watch the decision come down on television in her apartment, just as she did on the final day of her son’s preliminary hearing.

“When the judge announced his decision at the end of the hearing,” she said, “Alan was crying. He was crying. A mother can tell.”

1 posted on 06/27/2002 6:47:46 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; spectre; Jaded
PING...) ) ) Research Time...
2 posted on 06/27/2002 6:48:51 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; spectre; Amore; Travis McGee; BunnySlippers; DoughtyOne; Hillary's Lovely Legs; ...
Pinging...) ) )
3 posted on 06/27/2002 6:52:11 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; spectre; Jaded

Danielle’s Death
Child abductions do not, for the most part, occur at random.

By Rabbi Daniel Lapin, president of Toward Tradition, a Seattle-based national pro-family coalition of Jews and Christians.
March 12, 2002 8:50 a.m.


little girl is dead, left under a clump of oak trees in the backcountry east of San Diego. Many have seen her murder as a warning, applicable equally to all mothers and fathers, that child abduction occurs by random chance.

On March 1, a day after the body of Danielle Van Dam was identified, the San Diego Union-Tribune published a heart-rending account of parents and school counselors trying to explain to children how it could happen that seven-year-old Danielle was kidnapped and killed. "Mommy," a boy was quoted as saying, "I don't want anyone to steal me." Counselors advised parents "to listen to their children's fears and acknowledge them."

The unstated assumption of much of the press coverage of the tragedy has been just this: Children are afraid, counselors and parents are stumbling to find something comforting to say, for what happened to Danielle could as easily happen to any of our children. Since the grim discovery was made, the nation has absorbed the message that Danielle's death was an event without explanation or reason.

Or was it?

On the morning of February 2, Danielle was found to be missing from her bed. The man who has been arrested for her murder is 50-year-old David Westerfield. Reportedly a child-porn enthusiast, he is a neighbor of Danielle's parents, Damon and Brenda van Dam. That night, says the accused kidnapper, he and Mrs. Van Dam had been dancing at a local bar. Mrs. Van Dam denies dancing with Westerfield, but she does admit being out till 2 A.M. without her husband. Nor do the Van Dams deny the stories reported in Newsweek, stories that say they are active "swingers" with a taste for wife swapping. The Van Dams say their lifestyle has "nothing to do" with Danielle's abduction.

Let us be clear. This horrible death can be blamed only on the man who kidnapped Danielle. But if the Van Dams are indeed "swingers," if Mrs. Van Dam was carousing without her husband until rather late, then these parents — who deserve our sympathy no matter what their follies and vices may be — will have something in common with the parents of many other abducted children, beyond the bare fact that they have lost a child. For these terrible events do not, for the most part, occur at random.

The National Institute for Missing and Exploited Children supplies the figures. In 1997, 24 percent of abducted children were abducted by strangers. About half, 49 percent, were kidnapped by family members, typically a divorced parent. Another 27 percent were kidnapped by an acquaintance. In other words, 73 percent of abducted children suffered that fate due in part to lifestyle choices their parents made: the choice to divorce, or to befriend sleazy characters. When the media, by ignoring these data, give the impression that child kidnapping could happen to any family, the wholesome no less than the unwholesome, we are once again being grievously misled.

This same notion — that a certain kind of misfortune, in choosing victims, makes no distinction between wholesome and unwholesome — animated the AIDS scare of the late 1980s. Back then, the media and AIDS activists asserted that the disease was about to erupt among the population of heterosexuals who are not abusers of intravenous drugs. It never did. AIDS, it's now acknowledged, is a killer with a marked preference for people who engage in particular activities: anal sex and needle sharing.

It does occasionally happen that an unknown drifter will invade the life of an upstanding family and steal and murder their child. That is what happened to 12-year-old Polly Klaas, abducted from a slumber party in Petaluma, California, in 1993. It is what happened in 1981 to six-year-old Adam Walsh, whose father, TV host John Walsh of America's Most Wanted, initiated a campaign to place photos of missing children on milk cartons and junk mail. That well-intended campaign has supported the misconception that children go missing by chance. The brief biographical sketch of the missing child never indicates the family dysfunction that likely contributed to making the abduction possible.

Random kidnapping is not what happened to Danielle van Dam, and the fact is worth considering. For our actions have consequences — often unintended, often for future generations, often tragic — and parents would do well to remember this.

4 posted on 06/27/2002 7:00:08 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Poor mom. Looks like she gets her news from the nightly broadcasts and thus believes Alan is guilty, too. (He was always such a good could something like this happen?)

Posted this morning on yesterday's thread is my evaluation of the prosecution's "star witness," Dog Handler Volunteer and Amateur Part-time Search & Rescue Sleuth Frazee:

Re: Cadaver dogs. here's what I gleaned from Frazee's cross-exam yesterday:

Cielo showed no interest in MH, according to police report. Frazee originally told a police officer that Cielo showed no interest in MH.

"You were telling the truth then, weren't you?"
"To the best of my ability."

When was the first time you told anybody that Cielo had "alerted"?
"I don't recall."

"You told the police that your dog DID NOT alert, didn't you?"
"I don't recall."

Handler bias: handler directs dog to make an alert. Taking dog to wherever HE (handler) thinks what the dog should be looking for may be found. Dogs can feel handler's emotions and will sometimes "perform" to please handler. Search dog should not have been on leash and should search on his own for cadaver scent. Cielo was on leash and directed to sniff in specific areas, several times.

Frazee admits to guiding Cielo to find something because MH was in impound lot and DW was suspect. He led Cielo to the MH to search rather than letting the dog look and search on his own.

LE was standing all around, watching, as dogs searched. Told LE dogs did not make any hits. Police report states dogs did not make any hits. The first time he told anyone Cielo made an alert on the motorhome was WEEKS later. (Says his lieutenant was watching and she had to have observed the "alert," thus he did not feel it necessary to notify LE himself. Again, LE told dogs did NOT hit on anything, which was what they put in official report.)

Only person he told was dog's breeder in New Mexico ("I thought she would be proud."), weeks later, in an email. Email has not been provided.

Question: Did he testify that since taking the course on search & rescue this was his first "successful" hit?

Professionals undergo 960 hours of training...he underwent a single course. I wonder why they've pinned this case on an amateur volunteer's very first "cadaver alert," which he did not portray to observing law enforcement personnel at the time?

You'd think if his dog made a bonafide hit that he would be excited and telling everybody around that Cielo had made an alert in the storage compartment, not keep it a secret. He had taken a course, the dog had undergone some training for just this purpose. I find it hard to believe he would pass off his very first success as no big deal.

I admit, when he was under direct examination Frazee's testimony sounded damning. I hopped down from the fence and thought, "That's it. There can be no other explanation for a trained professional cadaver dog finding the scent of a cadaver unless a body had been in that motorhome's storage area." Then the cross-examination began, and Frazee's story began to unravel. And I'm back on the fence once more.

5 posted on 06/27/2002 7:10:24 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shezza
If the defense has done it's homework they would have had the motor home checked by an experienced dog and handler..

The prosecution has been so sloppy that the defense with experts can refute almost everything IMHO..

The ONLY thing is the blood on the jacket..all the rest is poorly documented.

6 posted on 06/27/2002 7:16:44 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; FresnoDA
Believe me, I don't want to see this Westerfield, get off...but what's with California law enforcement...This should have been simple, clean, forensics....This case was like forensics 101...I don't get it!
7 posted on 06/27/2002 7:23:12 AM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shezza; All
Court TV just had an interview with someone familiar with dogs who found the poor doghandler's testimony and expertise sadly lacking...

Next they have an expert on handling being interviewed. I suppose he will take the other side, and defend the amatuer handler...

Anyone watching?
8 posted on 06/27/2002 7:24:29 AM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shezza
This poor Mom made conflicting statements. She is saying on one hand, there was nothing to indicate her son would ever harm a flea, and OTOH, doesn't understand how he could have done it?

Nothing wrong with her thinking...she sounds like some of us :~)


9 posted on 06/27/2002 7:24:52 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I do not want to see Westerfield get off if he did, in fact, kill Danielle! Bit I have seen no hard evidence yet that proves he did anything...

I know others disagree, no need to point out the errors on my thinking...
10 posted on 06/27/2002 7:26:35 AM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

I want to see him " get off" if he is innocent...that should be what we all want. the true murderer dead in a chair.

But the truth is I do not believe this guy did it YET. The state has only ONE piece of evidence the jacket..thats it..

So lets see how the jacket is explained by the defense

11 posted on 06/27/2002 7:30:33 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
I am now thanks for the heads up!
12 posted on 06/27/2002 7:31:51 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
we agree 100%
13 posted on 06/27/2002 7:32:51 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; FresnoDA; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; MizSterious; Jaded; skipjackcity; RnMomof7; spectre; ...
Ping for today's thread
14 posted on 06/27/2002 7:43:04 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Wonder if and when Bobby Dylan will get around to writing a song like "Hurricane" for Westerfield.
15 posted on 06/27/2002 7:52:42 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Sorry to have misled you, either I misunderstood the program host, or the so-called expert didn't show up...
16 posted on 06/27/2002 7:53:47 AM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spectre
It's the natural parental reaction... what if I had done something differently. Guilt something that has been sorely lacking in this case, IMO.

Several things about the mother's interview struck me. First, it is apparent that they are not close, and apparently weren't raised to be. Mrs. W. seems to have a fixation on the man that she left. There's not quite as much David detail, stuff we'd already heard. On RR yesterday the interviewer stated mom said he was a loner and didn't have any friends. That statement was actually made by a neighbor. Spin... I just thought parts of it were odd, that's all.

17 posted on 06/27/2002 7:58:34 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Thanks for the ping!
18 posted on 06/27/2002 8:04:37 AM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Guilt? Reference the "Smart" family of Salt Lake. The father says he would never have hired the handy man if he had checked out his background first. THIS is an example of parental "guilt".

OTOH, we have the Van Dams, who absolutely 100% have never uttered one single word to take back the events of that evening, which when added up, certainly contributed to the culpability of their daughter's disappearance.

"We have no regrets"...

So much for guilt.


19 posted on 06/27/2002 8:25:16 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Thank you for the ping.. :)
20 posted on 06/27/2002 8:36:00 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-719 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson