Posted on 06/02/2002 4:29:20 PM PDT by Pokey78
THE United States must be prepared to take the War on Terror to up to 60 countries if weapons of mass destruction are to be kept out of terrorists’ hands, President Bush said at the weekend. His impassioned speech to 1,000 graduates of West Point Military Academy in New York State on Saturday marks a watershed in the Administration’s foreign policy. Mr Bush said that terrorism cells in countries that make up close to one third of the globe must be actively sought and dismantled. “We must take that battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans and confront the worst threats before they emerge,” he said, adding that Americans must be “ready for pre-emptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and to defend our lives”. He said: “In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act.” The 52-minute speech also contained a series of thinly veiled attacks on countries already singled out as enemies of the US. Mr Bush did not mention any country by name, but he pointed repeatedly to non-democratic regimes that are said to sponsor terrorism. In what officials later hinted was a reference to President Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, Mr Bush said that attempts to contain terrorist activity and anti-US sentiments within some countries would fail without direct action. “(Containment) is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or can provide them to terrorist allies,” he said. The criticism of foreign countries appeared to go further than any other he has made since September 11. “Some nations need military training to fight terror and we will provide it,” Mr Bush said. “Other nations oppose terror but tolerate the hatred that leads to terror and that must change.” White House officials told The Washington Post that these comments were directed at Middle East allies such as Saudi Arabia and Jordan. If the United States decides to make surprise strikes on other countries, it will mark a big change in strategy for the US military, which traditionally acts only in self-defence. The speech was billed by the White House as the first instalment of a renewed “overall security framework”. The framework will be expanded in a national security strategy document expected in July. Mr Bush said that America’s foreign policy would have three strands. “We will defend the peace against threats from terrorists and tyrants. We will preserve the peace by building good relations among the great powers. And will we will extend the peace by encouraging free and open societies on every continent.” He said that the conflict the graduates would be required to fight would differ greatly from that fought by their forefathers in Japan and Europe. “Enemies in the past needed great armies and great industrial capabilities to endanger the American people and our nation,” Mr Bush said. “The attacks of September 11 required a few hundred thousand dollars in the hands of a few dozen evil and deluded men. All of the chaos and suffering they caused came at much less than the cost of a single tank.”
I don't think this is doable. How about covert operations to fight
terrorism with its own tactics?
Why do I get the feeling that this is not quite the way it was said?
Maybe it is something like this:
The President makes a statement to the effect that we have to confront terrorist whereever they exist. Enterprising 'journalist' does some homework, and sees a large number of countries suspected of supporting terrorism. Maybe sixty, according to his figures.
Sits down at his word processor and extrapolates the statement to mean that we are planning an imminent war against sixty nations.
They wouldn't do that, would they?
Why do I get the feeling that this is not quite the way it was said?
Maybe because 9 months after Sept. 11th, we haven't even hit the top 3 countries that sponsor terrorism. We're chasing al-Qaeda all over the hills of Afghanistan while the real perpetrators are sitting in the halls of government in Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia laughing their heads off.
Would they be wrong? Bush's
rhetoric has to have a pony in it somewhere.
This will be a hard thing to do. We need to have proof that we can show to the world if we undertake sudden military attacks on other nations that we are not at war with. I agree with W that we can't sit back and wait for the islamic fascists to strike us with WMD. If its war the jihadists want lets give it to them in spades!
Now THAT'S a HYPERPOWER!
If Americans are afraid of terrorists now, just wait until we start dropping bombs in other countries.
It may take more than 9 months to replace the hardware needed; the military is recovering from a president who expended much of our ordinance covering his tracks with Monica, and other things.
Monica, the face that launched (and wasted) a thousand missiles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.