You hear all this so-called 'news' about Bush's photo being used in an improper context; they don't have the slightest problem with a President who rents out rooms in the White House to his cronies.
Then it's 'Bush knew about 9-11'
All of this is a non-story. It is a created story, crafted by the same creeps who brought you 'Bill n Hill', our dear old friends, the Democrats and their liberal pals.
'United We Stand'......just make sure the Democrat isn't standing behind you.
Are they really?
The Democrats have launched several attacks similar to this one.....including "Arsenic in water"...the ENRON accusations etc. etc. and it is not the Republicans who have been on the losing side but the Democrats. They haven't been able to make any of their manufactured accusations stick to Bush.
How was John Walker Lindh, a nobody from California, able to penetrate Al-Queda, and learn about the attacks that were going to be directed at our country, and our own intelligence agaencies supposedly couldn't?
Don't take this to mean that I think Bush was involved. I don't believe that there is enough evidence to support such a thing. But how can something that obviously took a lot of planning and preparation escaped our attention, given that we have vast technological resources to choose from, and even men in these countries? Something just doesn't add up.
He essentially would have had to shut down the entire commercial air fleet for an indefinite period of time with no way of knowing whether or not he was successful in preventing anything.
The dems would have been screaming their heads off.
Is the criticism of President Bush over the 9/11 warnings just political?
156,016 69% YES
71,294 31% NO
Its just an internet poll, but it gives a snapshot of what people are thinking. The actual numbers of Americans, who thought this was just politics, is probably a lot higher then 69%.
Clinton aides admit little done to foil terrorism
and this:
The Cost of Life (Clinton/Gore Sellout of Security for Campaign Contributions) **FR EXCLUSIVE** #3
Methinks that they (the media, liberals et.al.) are more motivated by the November elections than any sense of finding out the truth or assigning the blame where it truly belongs (on the Clintoon watch).
After all, they need to recaputure the stinking super-majority in both houses which is the only thing they truly care about...
It will die down over the summer, then just wait for after Labor Day -- they have only begun to sling hash.
Stay tuned.
The White House does not have a Batcave beneath it with super Bat Computers capable of taking these riddles from Islamic nutcases and telling us exactly what they're going to do, how, where, and when they plan to do it.
Our intellegence bureaus get vague warnings all the time. They are vague for a reason. That reason is that even Islamic fundementalists aren't stupid enough to tell us every single detail of what they intend to do.
DUMOCRAPS, PUT YOUR ILLOGICAL, POORLY THOUGHT OUT ACCUSATIONS BACK UP YOUR RECTUMS AND WAIT TILL YOU CAN DEPOSIT THEM IN THE TOILET LIKE EVERYONE ELSE!
It's so hypocritical of the Left that is reluctant to use military action to be asking why it wasn't used prior to 9/11.
Ruddy is lying here,and he knows it. The FBI,CIA,and other intelligence agencies didn't "fail",they did what they were ordered to do by their political masters in the White House. This is what they are supposed to do. It's the way the system is set up,and Ruddy KNOWS this.
Immediately after 9-11, NewsMax revealed – we were the first – that during the Clinton years the CIA had stopped recruiting spies within the terrorist networks.
And I guess because of this idiot Ruddy,we are supposed to believe the directors of these agencies turned money back in rather than use it to hire new employees or pay for information. We all KNOW that all of these bureaucracies HATE to build their empires up,and how they are so grateful when their budgets are cut.
Why was the rivalry between the FBI and CIA allowed to develop? Why was there no shared intelligence data base developed? Why were the recommendations to tighten up airline security discarded?
Lots of serious questions that need serious answers.