Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who women's lib actually liberated Exclusive: Barbara Simpson says females duped into ditching home
WorldNetDaily ^ | 4/22/02 | Barbara Simpson

Posted on 04/22/2002 4:40:48 AM PDT by kattracks

Talk about dumb broads

Posted: April 22, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

If women are so smart, why are they so dumb?

And before you get your panties in a bunch, I'm entitled to criticize females because the last time I checked, I'm one of them. Katie bar the door, I'm about to be incredibly politically incorrect.

Women have been sold a bill of goods, which they bought hook, line and sinker. Ever since the '60s, when the brunt of feminism hit the media, the message was clear: Go for it! You can have (be, do, experience) everything!

There's only one problem. It isn't true. Never was. Never will be.

But men knew that. Lost in the burst for female "freedom" was the ugly truth that men, who supposedly had "everything" that women were being denied, were really victims of a system that kept them prisoner.

It was the price they paid for being men. Their role in life was to be the breadwinner, the master of the home, the head and protector of the family, the person ultimately responsible for the survival of his tribe and the soldier-protector of his country.

He had to be brave, smart, hard working and supportive of the family. He had to be husband, father, son, sibling, uncle, neighbor, friend. He had to work to earn the means to play all those roles, and he had no choice.

This isn't to say there weren't scoundrels. Of course there were – men who deserted their women and children, who drank or gambled the family earnings, or womanized their way through marriages which hung together for "the sake of the children."

Guys like that aren't new and are still around. In fact, women's liberation has been great for men who prefer to chill out, and societal changes make it easy.

Want sex? Take your pick. Chicks are there for the asking; in fact, they'll compete to be the "chosen one" for the day. Or night. No questions. No promises. How great is that?

Don't want kids? No worry. There's all kinds of prevention (sounds like a plague, doesn't it?) with most of the responsibility on her. And if they don't "work" and a new life gets in the way, just get rid of it. It's legal, private and accepted. And if she's really a "today woman," she might not even tell you and just "take care of things" on her own. What a gal! What a life!

Don't want marriage? Duh. Just live together. Get the bennies and avoid the legal technicalities. Get tired of that? Leave. Hey, the door is always open.

Women's liberation freed men from responsibility. It encouraged women to "find" themselves. They were urged to "go for it" careerwise.

Of course they could do it. Women are smart and able to work hard and succeed. But by doing it, they walked right into the trap that men had been in all along.

Now they find themselves in careers that are time-consuming, require travel away from home and envelop their lives. In that sense, women turned into what they originally disliked about their men and in the process, made the ugly discovery that a major tradeoff was the signature of their femininity. They gave up or lost the opportunity to be a wife and a mother. Why weren't they smart enough to see that?

A new book by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, "Creating A Life," comes to the conclusion, after surveying nearly 1,200 high-achieving career women, that they missed life. One was quoted as saying "I forgot to have a child."

Forgot? Give me a break! Any woman who "forgets" so basic a part of the female psyche isn't smart enough to be considered a high achiever. Either that or today's standards aren't what they're cracked up to be.

Women always had to choose. The choice for career meant sacrificing the family role. And that is the key. Sacrifice. Women are supposed to have been liberated from sacrifice. They are supposed to be able to have and do it all. Except for the fact that it doesn't work.

The real tragedy of Hewlett's findings is the real, human loss to those women. By the time they realize the loss, they're too old biologically to have a child, and too old socially to find an appropriate man to marry. If she's been divorced or earns too much money, it's even harder.

As for the men, as the old saying goes, why buy the cow when the milk is free?

It makes you wonder who women's liberation really liberated?



Barbara Simpson, "The Babe in the Bunker" as she's known to her KSFO 560 radio talk-show audience in San Francisco, has a 20-year radio, television and newspaper career in the Bay Area and Los Angeles.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: kattracks
Bump for a great article. Feminism is just another in a long line of humanist lies. Sure, Western (Christian) culture hasn't made for a perfect society yet, but it sure beats anything else that's ever been tried.
101 posted on 04/23/2002 4:17:52 PM PDT by Egg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humbletheFiend
I'm against it women generally prefer their emotion to their logic and prefer freedom over security. If there were an incorruptable test for logic and intelligence then I would subject every potential voter to that test but since there is not I'm against the 19th.
102 posted on 04/23/2002 4:18:14 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I was but then Mom got me a car LOL and I still got to go to college. Still feel bad for my Father over it though.
103 posted on 04/23/2002 4:20:34 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Now, that's not necessarily true. Liberal women prefer their emotions. Conservative women prefer logic and use reason just like men do.

However, I must admit, after all those women went 'ga-ga' over Gore's mauling of his wife, Tipper, at the Democratic convention, I was one of the first calling for the repeal of the 19th amendment! LOL!

104 posted on 04/23/2002 4:21:57 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I'm 20 just like Weikel is, graduating from college in a few weeks & getting my MS this fall...

I have a guy and we love each other dearly. But I made the decision to not have to have sex until my wedding night--I've seen too many of my friends break off their relationships/engagements when they had formerly been absolutely sure about marriage. "Oh, we're going to marry someday anyway..." Pardon the language, but big BS! If a guy breaks up with you over not having extramartial sex, he's not worth it!

Reading stories like yours give me confidence that I am making the right decision. All my friends seem to be roomming together with their boyfriends now, screw marriage until you're at least 25 years old. There is incredible pressure on me (and everyone else of my generation) to just live together with my significant other.

Thank you. Spouses like you and your wife provide a shining example to our generation that the don't-have-sex-until-marriage life is indeed still possible.

105 posted on 04/23/2002 4:22:07 PM PDT by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
She has harsher rhetoric about marriage then I do.
106 posted on 04/23/2002 4:23:49 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Is that why you don't marry your girlfriend? Because you think it will end in divorce?

Or do you just not love her enough to marry her?

Or is this entire setup her idea?

107 posted on 04/23/2002 4:24:39 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
What you say about conservative vs liberal women is technically true but I maintain that some quirk of neurobiology made women more likely to prefer their emotions to their logic so by mass enfranchising women you create more illogical then logical voters.
108 posted on 04/23/2002 4:27:24 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
It is her idea actually.
109 posted on 04/23/2002 4:28:26 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
But generally speaking I would not marry for that reason not without ensuring that my property and any children would end up with me.
110 posted on 04/23/2002 4:29:41 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Do you love her or are you going along for all the freebies?
111 posted on 04/23/2002 4:29:59 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I would say both LOL.
112 posted on 04/23/2002 4:30:52 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: weikel
It's probably that little quirk having to do with the ability to conceive and bare children.

However, men are hardly the sole possessors of logic and reason. Seems the world was pretty screwed up for many, many years when men controlled all the institutions.

And sheesh...look at the Arab world. Women don't have much of a say there and well, just look at it. For some reason, I don't think you'd be much less cynical in THAT environment!

113 posted on 04/23/2002 4:35:55 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: weikel
It probably won't work out; try not to get her pregnant.

There is not hurt in the world like when you have a child from whom you are forcibly separated. You should know that there probably will be no respect and real love in this arrangement and neither of you will feel any real committment or obligation to each other.

Good luck, but I think you will emerge from this jaded and cynical about relationships. It's too bad your girlfriend doesn't have enough respect for you or herself to insist that you get married. Just don't have kids.

114 posted on 04/23/2002 4:39:40 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Only crackwhores get knocked up

Au contraire, young man. My niece got pregnant WHILE SHE WAS ON THE PILL!! They are not infallible, you know ( unless held tightly between the knees). And no, she was not a crackwhore, just silly enough to believe the guy was 'in love' with her so she had sex with him. When she told him she was pregnant, he was ok with it for about 2 weeks, then he told her he wasn't ready to be a father, and she should get an abortion. She was devastated, but had the baby anyway, a lovely girl who is now almost 15.

115 posted on 04/23/2002 4:39:47 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Feminism has been wonderful for men. Men do not carry nearly as many emotional consequences from sex, they have a lower chance of getting diseases & of course, they don't get pregnant. Today, the responsibility of pregnancy is totally on females.

Feminism--which played a large role in making cohabitating socially acceptable--has benefited men much more than women for the above reasons. Plus, now men are much less inclined to make a commitment--like the author said, why buy the cow when the milk is free? Now guys don't even to have to say the "l" word (love) for what they really want. Your girlfriend may like all this, but as other posters have pointed out, when she's 25 she won't like it nearly as much when she wants to settle down & no one will look her way as anything more serious than "free milk".

I'll spare you the lecture on cohabitation; it's your life. The original point of the article was that the feminism/sexual revolution benefited men greatly and at the same time shortchanged females.

OK, this is subject-changing & a bit of unrelevant ranting because I'm in a romantic mood, but I am so lucky to have a guy who is not afraid of commitment. He never even flirted with me or made any kind of move. We were best friends for a while and then he said "I love you" out of the blue. :) I've dated around enough to know that it's a very rare thing in this generation for a man our age to not to be afraid to love.

116 posted on 04/23/2002 4:42:17 PM PDT by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta;weikel
...I think you will emerge from this jaded and cynical about relationships.

ROFLOL! You don't think he's that way already?

117 posted on 04/23/2002 4:42:37 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Well the Arab World is a special case pssst... they are all gay I guess its because they never get to look at women. Ive heard this from guys on FR who used to work there. Gay men often inherit the illogical thinking of women. There were some Matriachal societies in the ancient world but they tended to get conquered by the more efficient and successful Patriachal ones the Celts are a good example.
118 posted on 04/23/2002 4:42:48 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
Au Contraire the responsibility is greatly on the man in case of pregnancy in Massachussetts you can be made to pay child support even if you aren't the actual father( no I am not kidding).
119 posted on 04/23/2002 4:44:36 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Yeah, I do, but there's something about experiencing it for yourself that pretty much sets the cynicism in stone for life.

Know what I mean?

120 posted on 04/23/2002 4:44:54 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson