Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Eleventh Commandment"
Enter Stage Right ^ | April 8, 2002 | David C. Wilcox

Posted on 04/10/2002 10:54:07 AM PDT by gordgekko

During Ronald Reagan's 1966 campaign for governor of California, Republicans established the so-called Eleventh Commandment: "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican."

It was proposed by State Republican Chairman Gaylord Parkinson to help prevent a repeat of the liberal Republican assault on Barry Goldwater that laid the foundation for Goldwater's trouncing in the 1964 presidential election. Just as Nelson Rockefeller and his East Coast cronies had branded Goldwater as an "extremist" who was unfit to hold office, so candidate George Christopher and California's liberal Republicans were leveling similar personal attacks on Reagan. Party liberals eventually followed Parkinson's advice, and the rest is history.

Fast forward to March 5, 2002.

While it wasn't the only factor, failure to observe the Eleventh Commandment undoubtedly played a role in the unprecedented implosion of Richard Riordan's gubernatorial campaign in California. It was déjà vu for Republican veterans when, for example, in the death throes of his failed campaign, Riordan invoked the ghosts of Rockefeller and Christopher by branding Bill Simon as an "extremist." Following suit, Gray Davis invoked the ghosts of Lyndon Johnson and Pat Brown by repeating Riordan's charge.

Although Sheriff Lee Baca (a registered Republican) won in a non-partisan election landslide, about a third of the Republican vote was against him -- a huge number of defections by anyone's standards. As with Riordan, his serial violations of the Eleventh Commandment played a role.

Too frequently for their fellow Republicans' tastes, both Riordan and Baca have endorsed, and (in Riordan's case) even financed, Democrats running against their Republican colleagues. What, after all, would constitute a greater violation of the Eleventh Commandment than endorsing a fellow Republican's opponent? How much more ill can one speak of a Republican than saying a Democrat is preferable?

Riordan's conservative "teammates" -- roughly two thirds of the Republicans who voted on March 5th -- answered these questions by sending him to the bench in the March Primary. If Baca ever chooses to run for a partisan office as a Republican, it's likely he'll take a seat next to the former Los Angeles mayor.

It's not that conservatives won't get behind a "moderate." On the contrary, many conservatives joined the Riordan bandwagon early on to maximize the chances of defeating Gray Davis. But, there was always an undercurrent warning that Riordan's endorsement and contribution record left his Republican credentials suspect. The same was true of Baca.

With the declining fortunes of the California Republican Party, like Riordan and Baca, many elected Republican officials have gone out of their way to curry favor of Democrats. Displaying no sense of Party loyalty, numerous Republican City Council members, for example, often contribute money and endorsements to help Democrats. The March 2002 Primary should serve as a wakeup call, strongly suggesting that they should give teamwork a chance rather than thinking only of themselves.

To defend themselves, such "Republicans" often attempt to turn the Eleventh Commandment on its ear. They charge any Republican who dares criticize them for supporting a Democrat with an Eleventh Commandment transgression.

Is this expected to pass as rational thought?

Sometimes they claim that they "vote for the person, not the party," or they are independent minded, or they are original thinkers. Horse feathers!

Politicians never register with a political party without calculating the value in doing so. The honest thing for an elected official who wants to pick and choose candidates from both Republican and Democrat slates would be to register with no party specified.

Many voters indeed find some of their ideas in both parties and, as a consequence, split their ballots between Democrats and Republicans. They do so in the privacy of the voting booth, and it's their right to do so. They're doing their civic duty to the best of their ability. But, they are not using the prestige of an elected office to influence large numbers of voters at the expense of their colleagues.

Most serious politicians realize that choosing no political party is a non-starter that would severely restrict their chances of being elected to higher office. Belonging to either of the major political parties is a huge advantage in seeking partisan office, because minor parties rarely elect major candidates.

Thus, Republican loyalists are justified in expecting elected officials either to support their Party's candidates or to simply remain silent. An elected Republican who repeatedly violates the Eleventh Commandment by publicly endorsing a Democrat over a fellow Party member is pursuing a self-destructive course. As the March 2002 Primary results show, Golden State Republican voters will eventually impose the Golden Rule.

David C. Wilcox is a Member-Elect of the 44th Assembly District Republican Central Committee who resides in La Cañada Flintridge. He is an aerospace research scientist and a freelance writer. He has written two political books entitled "Cliches of Liberalism" and ". . . And the Donkey They Rode in On," which are available from Amazon.com or from Dr. Wilcox's Internet site at http://www.dcwindustries.com/wilcox99.htm.

Other related articles: (open in a new window)


TOPICS: Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billsimon; gaylordparkinson; leebaca; richardriordan; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2002 10:54:08 AM PDT by gordgekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gordgekko; Poohbah; Gophack; Miss Marple; Howlin; JohnHuang2; Jim Robinson; Mudboy Slim; ...
I know this article is six months old, but I think it MUST be relevant, and I would even recommend that this be adopted as a standing rule of engagement for Freepers.

The concern in the New Hampshire Senate race is the lastest sign that perhaps the Eleventh Commandment, put in place by a GOP State Chairman to protect Ronald Reagan, is not just a good political move, it is a way that we can show that we have the character to do what it takes to turn this Republic around.

When the rubber meets the road, it's going to be a question as to who will ultimately set the agenda: George W. Bush, Denny Hastert, and the Republicans, or Al Gore, Dick Gephardt, and Little Tommy Daschle. Will it be our team, or their team, that wins the toss?

That's all I will say on this matter.

Could anyone wiht ping lists please bump this article up?
2 posted on 10/10/2002 7:22:00 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Smith is an independent. He only went back to the GOP out of expediency. I can talk about independents all I want.

Until Smith breaks the back of this write-in effort, his name is mud with me.
3 posted on 10/10/2002 7:35:53 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; Mudboy Slim
Amen to that.

The Eleventh Commandment is to prevent what Bob Smith is doing now, and what John Warner did in 1994.

There are circumstances where a GOP nominee might be so bad that we have to withhold our support (David Duke, Jim Traficant, and Gary Condit come to mind), but situations like a primary are to be expected in politics.

If anything, Smith HAD to pay a price for his 1999 bolt. And the price happened to be his Senate seat. It is up to us, the base of the Republican party, to strongly enforce the Eleventh Commandment against ALL who would violate it in a blatant manner. This includes those who would sabotage a Republican nominee for ideologial impurity.
4 posted on 10/10/2002 7:40:33 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
We need to all send this to Bob Smith's office and tell him to read!

I find what Smith is doing in NH about as low as you can get.

IMO he deserved what he got -- defeated!
5 posted on 10/10/2002 7:47:19 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Agreed.

Think this one is worth the "Take Back the Senate" ping?
6 posted on 10/10/2002 7:49:25 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

7 posted on 10/10/2002 8:17:22 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Run Ollie Run!!

FReegards...MUD

8 posted on 10/10/2002 8:34:04 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rintense; MJY1288; RedBloodedAmerican; twyn1; kitkat; justshe; ladyinred; lonestar; ...
Ping A Ling!!!
9 posted on 10/10/2002 8:34:35 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lodwick; Cuttnhorse; operation clinton cleanup; Servant of the Nine; catpuppy; null and void; ...
Ping O Ling!!
10 posted on 10/10/2002 8:36:27 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; hchutch
To defend themselves, such "Republicans" often attempt to turn the Eleventh Commandment on its ear. They charge any Republican who dares criticize them for supporting a Democrat with an Eleventh Commandment transgression.

Is this expected to pass as rational thought?

So, it's OK to criticize Riordan and Warner, because they supported Democrats against Republicans, do I have that right?

Is it OK to criticize Republicans who go wimpy against Clintonism?




11 posted on 10/10/2002 8:50:00 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I would even recommend that this be adopted as a standing rule of engagement for Freepers.

Ditto.

Conservatives need to re-learn that a house divided against itself cannot stand. To disagree is one thing but attack-mode is uncalled for ..... and makes us vulnerable to the common enemy, the liberals.

12 posted on 10/10/2002 8:53:23 AM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
In the primary campaign, yes it's okay. Backstabbing in the general election crosses the line in my book, and I will go after anyone who does so.

I don't care if the backstabber in question is conservative, moderate, or RINO. THEY are the ones causing civil war among the GOP.
13 posted on 10/10/2002 9:10:20 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Although I have serious reservations about the intent of the so-called 11th Commandment, which is broken with increasing frequency these days, maybe it's time for a 12th Commandment:
Thou shalt not lend support to Democrats.
To put teeth in in, Republicans who openly support the election of Democrats would forfeit their right to run for office as Republicans.

That ought to put the RINOs on notice.

14 posted on 10/10/2002 9:11:07 AM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; NordP
Thanks. I can think of several Republicans who should read this! Pinging Nord because I can't tell if she was on your list. Sorry, Nordie, if you were double pinged.
15 posted on 10/10/2002 9:21:39 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
They can run for office, but as Riordan learned, their donation and endorsement habits can and will be used against them. Taking disagreements past a primary and failure to support a nominee ought to be reason for the grassroots to take out an officeholder.

I do not care whether they are conservative, moderate, or RINO. Unless there are VERY MAJOR problems (we're talking John Warner/Jim Traficant stuff or worse), Republican office holders had darn well better be team players in the general election, and it's time a BIG "or else" is in there.
16 posted on 10/10/2002 9:53:53 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Bump for a good read!
17 posted on 10/10/2002 10:13:04 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for the ping, Mo. Despite his girth, Smith is a shallow and petulant little man. He is a loser, always has been, always will be.
18 posted on 10/10/2002 10:55:54 AM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gordgekko; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...

19 posted on 10/11/2002 4:46:56 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logician2u; gordgekko; Snow Bunny; Alamo-Girl; onyx; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; ...
The "Eleventh Commandment"

The eleventh commandment:

"Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican."

The twelfth commandment:

"Thou shalt not lend support to Democrats"

Food for thought and fyi.......



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.

20 posted on 10/11/2002 4:52:47 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson